Preferences for Distributional Impacts of Climate Policy
In: Environmental and resource economics, Band 75, Heft 1, S. 1-24
ISSN: 1573-1502
28 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Environmental and resource economics, Band 75, Heft 1, S. 1-24
ISSN: 1573-1502
In: Journal of economic dynamics & control, Band 30, Heft 5, S. 899
ISSN: 0165-1889
In: Journal of economic dynamics & control, Band 29, Heft 6, S. 1025-1041
ISSN: 0165-1889
In: Annals of public and cooperative economics, Band 78, Heft 2, S. 221-244
ISSN: 1467-8292
ABSTRACT**: We investigate a bureaucratic principal responsible for the procurement of goods and services from private agents. The bureaucrat is evaluated on output and controlled by a limited budget. The agents maximize profit, have private information about variable production costs, and have positive outside options which are lost upon acceptance of a procurement contract. The setting is relevant for, e.g. governmental agencies. We show how this setup makes probabilistic rationing and overproduction for low‐cost agents a useful tool for the bureaucrat.
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 84, S. 226-237
ISSN: 0264-8377
In: Environmental and resource economics, Band 71, Heft 4, S. 1053-1075
ISSN: 1573-1502
In: Environmental and resource economics, Band 69, Heft 4, S. 713-732
ISSN: 1573-1502
The free market economy, to which East European countries are increasingly being exposed, implies that classical budgeting techniques in the form of the Faustmann approach present themselves as the tools of choice for forest investment analysis. One implication is that the choice of a proper discount rate (r) must be made as part of the basis for formulating a harvest policy. The paper discusses this choice in the light of practice as well as theory, and, using Lithuania as a case, examines the potential economic and political impact of softening the current restrictions on forest management. A review of the debate on discounting in forestry is provided. A statistical analysis of the relation between reported rs and internal rates of return (IRR) from numerous studies on forestry investments reveals a strong correlation between r and IRR. Possible explanations are provided. Analysis reveals that application of any positive r will significantly change forestry practice in Lithuania. Setting r = 3 per cent, slow growing species are to be replaced by fast growing species, and rotation periods should be substantially shortened. The standing volume of (over-) mature forests is about 160 million m3, as compared with the currently harvestable volume of about 40 million m3 according to the minimum allowable rotation age. The macroeconomic perspectives of cashing some of the mature forest for the small transition economy are discussed, taking into account the effects of externalities of forests. Consequently we suggest an alternative formulation of the normal forest. Finally, based on these considerations, a real r of 0-2 per cent is suggested for State forestry in Lithuania. A post-tax r of 2 per cent is advocated for private forestry, with potential project specific deviations downward to 0 or upward to 4 per cent. It is stressed that discount rate is viewed as one of important decision parameters and due regard should be given to non-timber forest outputs, social and institutional settings and other factors.
BASE
In: Environmental management: an international journal for decision makers, scientists, and environmental auditors, Band 40, Heft 5, S. 761-774
ISSN: 1432-1009
In: Environmental and resource economics, Band 75, Heft 1, S. 105-136
ISSN: 1573-1502
In: Environmental management: an international journal for decision makers, scientists, and environmental auditors, Band 51, Heft 3, S. 586-601
ISSN: 1432-1009
In: Environmental and resource economics, Band 39, Heft 3, S. 247-263
ISSN: 1573-1502
In: Environmental and resource economics, Band 49, Heft 4, S. 491-510
ISSN: 1573-1502
In: Forestry Sciences Ser. v.58
The study was conducted in the framework of the FP1201 FACESMAP COST Action (Forest Land Ownership Change in Europe: Significance for Management and Policy) which is supported by the EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020. BJT acknowledges the support of the Danish National Research Foundation for the Centre for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate (DNRF96). MH and VJ were supported by NAZV (QK1820041) and grant EVA4.0, No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000803 financed by OPRDE. ZS and ZD have been supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract no. APVV-15-0715. JN and DN were supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia. SPM was financed by the Research Programs P4 – 0059 of the Slovenian Research Agency. DF acknowledges to Rosario Alves (FORESTIS). SKO acknowledges the Croatian Union of Private Forest Owners' Associations. TS acknowledges Mr. Oikonomou, president of the Greek Private Owners' Association. Open Access for this article was provided by the Estonian University of Life Sciences; Forest Research Institute (IBL, Poland); Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; University of Copenhagen; University of Eastern Finland; University of Ljubljana; and University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU). ; Peer reviewed ; Publisher PDF
BASE