Suchergebnisse

First published in 1998, this volume asked the question, what is Europe?. What is Finland's position in Europe?. The author tries to give an answer to these questions by defining first Europe in terms of its key political traditions and then locating Finland into this map of historical ideas. The ultimate purpose of this analysis of historical ideas is very pragmatic as it tries to find an answer to the core problems of European unification. Why are different European countries at differing levels of readiness as far as the project of unification is concerned?. The answer can be found again in political traditions.

The European Union's (EU's or hereinafter 'Union's') self-understanding has to be perceived as one of the most essential factors shaping the EU's role in world politics. This article focuses on how the EU perceives itself as an international power. The EU's self-understanding, which first outlined European unity as a force for change in the world, moved in the Cold War context in a more state-centric direction. The protection of European security and - gradually - the EU's own territory and citizens were seen as the primary goals of the EU's power. The idea of the EU as an owner of common rights, responsibilities, and interests emerged and has been efficiently used later on in the EU's policies. With the historical enlargement, the big power identity was all the more emphasized. In the context of enlargement, the successes of European integration started to appear as a firm source of the Union's power. The EU sees itself as a large territorial actor, whose power emanates from its economic might, political unity, and a very special system of internal cooperation. The comprehensive framework of instruments is clearly viewed as the main asset of the EU's power.