Suchergebnisse

The subject matter of the paper includes criminal legal (theoretical, normative and practical) issues of financial investigation as an increasingly important instrument of adequacy of the state response to property crime. A lot of issues have been analysed and particular attention has been paid to the following issues: the notion and assumptions of the adequacy of the state response to property crime; criminal and political reasons for the necessity of conducting a financial investigation, as well as the most important features of its standardization and practical realization (conditions, subject matter and objectives, as well as the basic principles of its implementation – urgency and timeliness of the procedure, exclusion of the possibility of invoking confidentiality of data, transfer of burden of proof to the suspect, confidentiality of the collected data, etc.) At the end of the paper, the authors' position regarding the adequacy of the analysed legal norms in terms of the desired degree of success in detecting, proving and confiscating property acquired through the commission of criminal offenses is presented. ; Предмет анализе у раду су кривичноправна (теоретска, нормативна и практича) питања финансијске истраге као све значајнијег инструмента адекватности државне реакције на криминалитет с имовинским обележјем. Међу немалим бројем анализираних питања посебна пажња је посвећена питањима која се тичу: појма и претпоставки адекватности државне реакције на криминалитет с имовинским обележјем; криминално-политичких разлога неопходности спровођења финансијске истраге као и најважнијих особености њеног нормирања и практичне реализације (услова, предмета и циља, као и основних начела њеног спровођења - хитност и благовременост поступања, искључење могућности позивања на тајност података, пребацивање терета доказивања на осумњиченог, поверљивост прикупљених података и др). На крају рада изнет је став аутора по питању адекватности анализираних законских норми за жељени степен успешности откривања, доказивања и одузимања имовине стечене вршењем кривичних дела.

This paper investigates the Federalist papers while stressing the significance of individual liberty in the US political system. The main intention of this paper is to locate and to define the current state of individual liberty in the US, taking into account the US political authorities' attitude. This research derives from the following research question: What are the challenges of individual liberty in the US as a human right taking into account the Federalist papers? The US Federalist papers are treated as a "Constitution" of the individual liberty, and its driving force. Besides the right to life, this human right emerges as the second but not less significant than the latter. Individual liberty confirms the right to life and the right to live in a free, prosperous, and democratic society, where the state power is limited by human rights, and thus, guaranteeing the well–being of the people. Individual liberty as a basic human right, especially recognizable for the US, remains as a main pillar of the US democratic political system, historically established by the Founding fathers. In the end, this paper concludes that individual liberty is taken, not given by the state, and thus, it must be improved and preserved, as a bulwark against the destructive forces of the state and its repressive apparatus.