12 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Comparative Economic Studies, Band 56, Heft 3, S. 469-489
SSRN
In: Comparative economic studies, Band 49, Heft 2, S. 177-200
ISSN: 1478-3320
In: Comparative economic studies, Band 56, Heft 3, S. 469-489
ISSN: 1478-3320
In: International Center for Public Policy Working Paper No. 12-16
SSRN
Working paper
In: International journal of public administration, Band 33, Heft 12-13, S. 601-619
ISSN: 1532-4265
In: International journal of public administration: IJPA, Band 33, Heft 12, S. 601-620
ISSN: 0190-0692
In: WBI learning resources series
The exposition is based on an analytical framework covering all ?building blocks? of fiscal federalism: size and structure of jurisdictions, expenditures, revenues, transfers, and borrowing. The application of this framework to Russian settings results in a comprehensive assessment of the state of intergovernmental fiscal relations in Russia
The exposition is based on an analytical framework covering all ?building blocks? of fiscal federalism: size and structure of jurisdictions, expenditures, revenues, transfers, and borrowing. The application of this framework to Russian settings results in a comprehensive assessment of the state of intergovernmental fiscal relations in Russia.
In: Public budgeting & finance, Band 42, Heft 3, S. 23-40
ISSN: 1540-5850
AbstractThe new Constitution of Nepal established a federal system of governance in 2015. Implementation began in 2018 following the 2017 subnational elections. The new system is comprised of seven provinces and 753 local governments. The constitution assigns important functional responsibilities to provincial and local governments and mandates that they have significant autonomy in deciding how services will be delivered. Subnational governments accounted for over one‐third of total government expenditures planned for FY2021, financed primarily by intergovernmental transfers. This paper describes the new federal system, discusses the early implementation successes and challenges, and draws some lessons from Nepal's experience.
In: OECD Fiscal Federalism Studies; Measuring Fiscal Decentralisation, S. 71-88
In: Problems of economic transition, Band 49, Heft 1, S. 51-94
ISSN: 1557-931X
In: Journal of international development: the journal of the Development Studies Association, Band 35, Heft 7, S. 1852-1873
ISSN: 1099-1328
AbstractThailand has witnessed very uneven spatial outcomes of economic policies pursued in the country since the 1970s. This partially resulted from top‐down, place‐based approaches favoring the already prosperous regions. Therefore, in order to bridge the territorial economic divide in the country, an alternative policy framework is needed to promote bottom‐up, place‐based initiatives led by local governments. As a starting point, we surveyed a stratified sample of local governments in Thailand to document and classify their economic development activities using the taxonomy of similar practices found in other countries. We examined how these practices are shaped by local conditions found in various localities.