Suchergebnisse

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) Nomor 74/PUU-XII/2014 meninggalkan harapan yang belum terpenuhi, yakni rumusan standar konstitusional sebagai pertimbangan dalam pemberian dispensasi umur perkawinan. Makalah ini akan menjawab alasan mengapa MK menolak merumuskannya? dan bagaimana standar konstitusional yang bisa dirumuskan? MK menolak permohonan pemohon judicial review untuk menjadikan kehamilan di luar perkawinan sebagai satu-satunya standar pemberian dispensasi umur perkawinan. Penolakan ini mengisyaratkan MK menganggap bahwa hal itu merupakan open legal policy; suatu saat bisa berubah sesuai dengan kebutuhan dan konteks masyarakat. MK juga tidak menggunakan UUD 1945 untuk merumuskan rumusan standar konstitusional dispensasi perkawinan karena hal itu harus ditempuh melalui legislative review. Sebagai tawaran dari penulis dalam legislative review, standar konstitusionalnya bisa dirumuskan melalui pendekatan hukum non sistematik dan pembacaan maqashid syari'ah. Pertimbangannya harus memperhatikan perlindungan kepentingan agama (Pasal 28E ayat (1) UUD 1945), kepentingan kepastian hukum bagi pelaku (Pasal 28D ayat (1) UUD 1945), kebebasan kehendak dan keyakinan (Pasal 28E ayat (2) UUD 1945), kepentingan kesejahteraan hidup (Pasal 28H ayat (1) UUD 1945), dan hak asasi yang dimiliki keturunan (Pasal 28B ayat (1) UUD 1945).The decision of Constitutional Court Number 74/PUU-XII/2014 leaves the unmet expectations, which is the standard for an exemption in marital age. The paper will provide the answer to the reason why the Court refused to set the standard? And how the Court should formulate it as the constitutional standards? The Court rejected the petitioner arguments in the judicial review case to make pre-marital pregnancy as the only standard to set an exemption of marital age. It suggests that the Court considers it is an "open legal policy"; where the policy may change according to the needs of society. The Court also did not use the Constitution to give the interpretation on the constitutional standard in ...

If the Government is always consistent to ensure the rights of indigenous people over ulayat forest, of course there will be no legislation which is contrary to the constitution, because the constitution had always guaranteed it. The Decision of Constitutional Court Number 35/PUU-X/2012 which declares that Article 1 point 6, Article 4 paragraph (3), article 5 paragraph (1), paragraph (2), paragraph (3) of Law 41/1999 on Forestry unconstitutional shows that there is inconsistency in regulating indigenous forest. In the perspective of human rights, the articles have a spirit of protection of indigenous peoples' rights over ulayat forest which is repressive derogable in nature. Meanwhile, the Constitutional Court decision has the spirit of progressive derogable protection. The first spirit means that because the state could derogate the recognition of ulayat forest if it is incompatible with the development of society and contrary to the principles of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, then the ulayat forest should be seen as the state forest. In the contrary, the next spirit means that although the state could derogate the recognition based on the preceeding requirements, the ulayat forest should be defined as ulayat forests. The first spirit is a repressive one because it aims at subordinating ulayat forests in the name of state forests. Meanwhile, the progressive spirit has the character of liberation and empowerment, it aims at removing the term of ulayat forests from state forests.

A theory having been known in the discourse of civil and political rights is a state has to act by omission (by not to do anything that can limit to as well as oppress these rights). It is this theory that was used as argument to petition for judicial review of law No.1/PNPS/Th.1965. This law was regarded having limited freedom of conscience and religion, that are parts of civil and political rights.After the implementation of freedom of conscience and religion have been evaluated, this should not be absolute because it will cause instability of harmony of religious community. The uncontrolled freedom, in fact, will encourage the deviation. The deviation that often happens is the mistaken interpretation.It caused the misuse or desecretion of religion.The state as organizer of people life, therefore, has the responsibility for controling the implementation of religious freedom in the light of harmony, and for preventing it from the misuse or desecretion. It is in this moment that Law No.1/PNPS/Th.1965 has been regulated to control the religious freedom in the light of harmony.

This paper aims to discuss some decisions of the Constitutional Court on judicial review of the Forestry Law. There are both positive and negative. A positive decision, to my opinion, can seen in No 013/PUU-III/2005 and No 021/PUU-III/2005. The reason I regard as a positive is based on the consequences of decision, which legitimates article about the ban on illegal logging in forests and the confiscation of equipment for stealing wood as constitutional ones. It is supporting conservation.A decision that negatively affects the spirit of conservation is noted in decision No. 003/PUU-II/2005. This ruling tends to prioritize legal certainty for mining companies to resume an open mine system in the preserved forestry. The author saw this one as reflection of the legal policy construction on forestry law that is taken hostage by exploitation interests.This paper, furthermore, tries to uncover the legal policy construction on forestry law as the base of problem sources. Therefore, the author needs to search for not only informations which are in the textual decision, but also ones are beyond it. The larger model of legal policy can be seen from the process of determining emergency condition when formulating the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perpu), then when changing the Perpu become law, and government regulations concerning forestry post-decision of the Court Number 003/PUU-II/2005.The advantage of this paper is on efforts to uncover the source alignments of forestry law on the big corporation based on decision number 003/PUU-II/2005. It to know this source that could be an important basis to understand why decision of the Constitutional Court on the preserved forest is taken hostage.

Ali Syari'ati is muslim brilliant philosopher, graduated from doctoral of Sorbonne France. He created social teology perspective, based from his experience in west sociology perspective about Capitalism or Marxism. He succeed seek the Capitalism and Marxism weaknes if this perspective is used in Muslim Society. He mapping structure of society, insist of: Habil and Qobail. Habil is common people in society, Qabil is high class, likes: prince, aristocrats or capital owner. Qabil was repressedHabil trough social, politic, economy and religious system. This tragedy happen in Iran whenSyah Reza rezim. The consequences, Ali Syari'ati propagandist rebellion Habil to Qabil. Because of his activities, he to be prisoner one more time, then he is going abroad, until he pass away in England (with suspicious that he killed by Syah Reza people). The Iran Revolution happen, after 2 years Ali Syaria'ti pass away

This article duscuss the enactment of Narcotics Examination Certificate (SKPN) as requirements for marriage request at the Office of Religious Affairs (KUA) is located in Nunukan, Nunukan, North Kalimantan. As a local policy, it must be reviewed from the principle of government administration and the benefits for society. This is very important so that in the future, this policy will not be considered illegal. By using qualitative research methods and extracting data through interviews, documentation and observation, this research concludes as follows. Implementation of the addition of SKPN as requirement for marital administration has fulfilled the principle of government administration, which consists of legal aspects, protection of human rights (HAM) and principles of good general government (APUB). Meanwhile, from maqāṣid syarī'ah perspective, the benefits of the policy is the protection of religion, soul, mind, wealth, and honor or lineage.Artikel ini mendiksusikan pemberlakuan Surat Keterangan Pemeriksaan Narkoba (SKPN) sebagai persyaratan permohonan kehendak nikah di Kantor Urusan Agama (KUA) Kecamatan Nunukan Kabupaten Nunukan Provinsi Kalimantan Utara. Sebagai kebijakan lokal, kebijakan ini harus ditinjau dari asas penyelenggaraan administrasi pemerintahan dan kemanfaatannya bagi masyarakat. Hal ini sangat penting agar dikemudian hari, kebijakan ini tidak dianggap melanggar hukum. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dan penggalian data melalui interview, dokumentasi dan observasi, penelitian ini menghasilkan kesimpulan sebagai berikut. Pelaksanaan penambahan SKPN sebagai syarat administrasi perkawinan telah memenuhi asas penyelenggaraan administrasi pemerintahan, yang terdiri dari aspek legalitas, perlindungan hak asasi manusia (HAM) dan asas pemerintahan umum yang baik (APUB). Sementara itu, dari perspektif maqāṣid syarī'ah, kemanfaatan dari kebijakan tersebut meliputi perlindungan terhadap agama, jiwa, akal, harta, dan kehormatan atau keturunan.