Suchergebnisse

"Finding Your Ethical Research Self introduces novice researchers to the need for ethical reflection in practice and gives them the confidence to use their knowledge and skill when, later as researchers they are confronted by big ethical moments in the field. The 12 chapters build on each other, but not in a linear way. Core ethical concepts like consent and confidentiality once established in the early chapters are later challenged. With numerous examples of ethical dilemmas and issues and questions and exercises to encourage self-reflection, this reflexive, learn-by-doing model of research ethics will be highly useful to the novice, undergraduate and postgraduate research student"--

Mapping undergraduate pathways, not destinations -- Public sociology capstones -- The neoliberal intern -- Initial student response to public sociology -- Overreaching community organisations -- Fostering student responsibility for others -- Getting it nearly right : public sociology capstone 2017 -- Messy creative coaching -- Like sherbet dropped in lemonade : student stories -- Learning outcomes 2012-2017 -- Appendices -- References

Social science departments, both nationally and internationally, market boundless career destinations for their graduates but fail to identify the pathways to these lucrative destinations, and appear oblivious to the social forces that threaten their existence, such as the discerning parent's investment in their offspring's education and mounting individual student debt. This book responds to these social forces, drawing on Michael Burawoy's model of Public Sociology to show how a research-centred experiential internship provides opportunities for students to draw on their prior learning and realise their potential to create pathways towards employment. The author demonstrates how a specific, research-based course leading to employment with a non-government organisation or government department was evaluated and incrementally developed, giving voice to its multiple beneficiaries. Designed for university teachers, this book will appeal to those in social science departments who are using an internship, service learning or capstone model for their senior undergraduate classes.

"Neither ethics committees nor qualitative researchers can predict the types of ethical dilemmas that will happen in the field, only that they will routinely occur. In Qualitative Ethics in Practice, a team of fifteen top researchers from various disciplines and nationalities offer ethical strategies unique to qualitative researchers for those "big ethical moments" beyond what can be predicted by ethics committees. Ideally structured for qualitative classes that tackle ethics issues, the book -calls for an ethical code unique to the practice of qualitative research; -uses a variety of cases from education, community development, tourism, family, and other settings to examine how researchers addressed ethical dilemmas in practice, including the infamous Belfast Project; -highlights some relevant models and programs being developed that may lead to solutions"--

Existe uma tendência preocupante nas ciências sociais através do qual os pesquisadores ignoram a revisão ética. Autoetinógrafos muitas vezes se isentam dos Comitês de Revisão institucional (CRI) alegando que as histórias que contam são de sua própria autoria; Mesmo quando outros escreveram em suas histórias podem não consentir. Uma situação semelhante surge na etnografia, onde os pesquisadores novatos geram dados antes de iniciar seus estudos de pós-graduação, esquivando-se da supervisão ética e também sem demonstrar considerações éticas básicas. Goffman transformou seu doutorado em "On the Run" baseado em seis anos de trabalho de campo em bairros negros no interior da cidade. "Gangleader for a Day" de Venkatesh, também com base em seu doutorado, descreve pesquisas no interior de uma cidade sem considerações éticas. Como os futuros estudantes de pós-graduação em ciências sociais lerão esses best-sellers? Author criou um pequeno cenário encapsulando esses dois livros e pedindo a academias e membros do CRI para revisá-los. Sob quais condições supervisionariam ou aprovariam os dados coletados antes da inscrição em um doutorado que não demonstrasse evidências de considerações éticas. Os entrevistados expressaram preocupação com os dados coletados sem considerações éticas, considerando essa prática inadmissível, semelhante ao termo legal da árvore venenosa. Eles reconhecem que são mais propensos a agravar do que aliviar o dano.