Suchergebnisse

"Phishing for Nazis is an evidence-based, undercover study of neo-Nazi communities on anonymous communication platforms that helps to shine a light on the dark web. It unveils how hatred and conspiracies spread and thrive online and how white supremacy is becoming prominent as extremists find shelter in the online, dank underbelly of society"--

"Phishing for Nazis is an evidence-based, undercover study of neo-Nazi communities on anonymous communication platforms that helps to shine a light on the dark web. It unveils how hatred and conspiracies spread and thrive online and how white supremacy is becoming prominent as extremists find shelter in the online, dank underbelly of society"--

Artificial intelligence (AI) is currently perceived as the most disruptive emerging technology, with more and more members of contemporary society seeing it as a significant driver of job loss. Without understanding the opportunities to transform labor relations through the emergence of new professions and the abandonment of those professions that can be replaced by automation, technologies based on artificial intelligence are considered a formidable adversary of humanity and not a tool created to production processes support. On the other hand, more and more companies are implementing emerging technologies to automate production processes, to optimize management, to implement effective security solutions and to diversify communication.
In this context, we aim to analyse how and in what way emerging technologies will interact with the legal field and propose a picture of future work reports. It is becoming increasingly clear that social resilience also requires an adequate legal framework, able to adapt to the new challenges caused by the digitization of the labor market.
The National Institute for Research and Development in Informatics - ICI Bucharest is concerned with scientific research and applied development, actively involved in ensuring the cyber security of the identity of any person, natural and legal, and through the solutions for the sustainability of the digitalized society, it supports the national effort to ensuring cyber security, an important part of national security.

While the Dark Web is the safest internet platform, it is also the most dangerous platform at the same time. While users can stay secure and almost totally anonymously, they can also be exploited by other users, hackers, cyber-criminals, and even foreign governments. The purpose of this article is to explore and discuss the tremendous benefits of anonymous networks while comparing them to the hazards and risks that are also found on those platforms. In order to open this dark portal and contribute to the discussion of cyber and politics, a comparative analysis of the dark and deep web to the commonly familiar surface web (World Wide Web) is made, aiming to find and describe both the advantages and disadvantages of the platforms.

Abstract: Cyber attacks are now becoming more and more complex, more frequent and with increasing destructive effects. Regardless of the type or value of an organization, it affects information of public and private infrastructures. Moreover, private information may be struck by those who hold, even temporarily, various public or dignified functions in a state. In other words, it can hit the information profile of a target by affecting data about identity, about finance, can changing information from personal conversations and other private life activities.In this context, the terrorism aims to execute actions, driven only once or in series, motivating as resistance to political, economic or social changes and producing global information effects. It is well known the development of terrorism is favored by the development of information technology. Through these, terrorist organizations seek to enhance the perception of terror, by capturing the attention of the global media and by transmitting apocalyptic messages. Last but not least, the social factor and the arms proliferation determine the adapt of objective aspect of terrorism, often the modeling of terrorist ideology based on issues of population discontent with the ease of acquisition of weapons, munitions and destructive materials through various forms of trade.In this work we propose to determine the content of the concept of cyber terrorism, starting from the analysis of the main factors of public insecurity and social disorder that facilitate the development of modern forms of terrorism. In this order we propose to underline the base aspects to understand the ways of its application.

The aim of the paper is to develop at least a part of a voice which is still difficult to understand in the Czech language environment, the voice of the others, (ex-rivals), the 'expelled', and to anchor it in the work and politics of remembering, registering and writing history of one specific author (we are talking about the continuity of perspective: about fidelity to images, local mythology, its logic). For thirty years, Alfred Klaar (born as Karpeles in 1848 in Prague) co-established Prague discourse in German language from various positions (as a journalist, theatre critic, representative of various societies, ceremony speaker, associate professor of the local German polytechnic etc.). When he moved to Berlin in July 1899, he was almost fifty-one years old. He left his home (both in the narrow sense of the word, as well as the wider sense of 'Austrian home', so important to him), but he always kept the world he had lived in for so long in his mind and preserved many links with it in spite of the geographical distance. He also returned to his homeland on various occasions (funerals and other ceremonies, lectures) and he also remained talked about primarily among the Prague German circles; as a piece of memorabilia he was dusted and remembered in stories, and at the same time rightfully seen and honoured as a foreign envoy and speaker of compatriot cultural and political interests.

The aim of the paper is to develop at least a part of a voice which is still difficult to understand in the Czech language environment, the voice of the others, (ex-rivals), the 'expelled', and to anchor it in the work and politics of remembering, registering and writing history of one specific author (we are talking about the continuity of perspective: about fidelity to images, local mythology, its logic). For thirty years, Alfred Klaar (born as Karpeles in 1848 in Prague) co-established Prague discourse in German language from various positions (as a journalist, theatre critic, representative of various societies, ceremony speaker, associate professor of the local German polytechnic etc.). When he moved to Berlin in July 1899, he was almost fifty-one years old. He left his home (both in the narrow sense of the word, as well as the wider sense of 'Austrian home', so important to him), but he always kept the world he had lived in for so long in his mind and preserved many links with it in spite of the geographical distance. He also returned to his homeland on various occasions (funerals and other ceremonies, lectures) and he also remained talked about primarily among the Prague German circles; as a piece of memorabilia he was dusted and remembered in stories, and at the same time rightfully seen and honoured as a foreign envoy and speaker of compatriot cultural and political interests. ; 39 ; 59