Om pengar och psykisk hälsa – Ensamhetens sociala grund
In: Tidsskrift for psykisk helsearbeid, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 76-85
ISSN: 1504-3010
20 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Tidsskrift for psykisk helsearbeid, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 76-85
ISSN: 1504-3010
In: Tidsskrift for psykisk helsearbeid, Band 8, Heft 4, S. 303-312
ISSN: 1504-3010
In: Tidsskrift for psykisk helsearbeid, Band 1, Heft 4, S. 4-15
ISSN: 1504-3010
In: The international journal of social psychiatry, Band 58, Heft 4, S. 417-424
ISSN: 1741-2854
Background: The quality of the relationship between professional and user is one of the important factors in the recovery process. However, more knowledge is needed concerning the components of helping relationships and characteristics of the helping professional. The aim of this study was to explore users' experiences of helping relationships with professionals. Data and methods: This was a grounded theory analysis of 71 qualitative interviews to explore users' experience of helping relationships and their components, in psychiatric care in Sweden. Discussion: Within the three main categories – interpersonal continuity, emotional climate and social interaction – two core themes were found that described vital components of helping relationships: a non-stigmatizing attitude on the part of the professionals and their willingness to do something beyond established routines. Conclusions: The focus in psychiatric treatment research needs to be broadened. In addition to research on the outcome of particular methods and interventions, the common factors also need to be investigated, above all, what is the effect of the quality of the relationship between user and professional. Greater attention needs to be paid, as well, to how helping respective obstructive relationships in psychiatric services arise, are maintained or are modified.
In: Tidsskrift for psykisk helsearbeid, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 99-103
ISSN: 1504-3010
In: The international journal of social psychiatry, Band 66, Heft 2, S. 156-162
ISSN: 1741-2854
Background: User involvement, based on respect and carried out through dialogue, has been shown to lead to increased self-respect, self-confidence and positive identity. In Sweden, the Social Service Act requires that interventions be designed and implemented together with the individual concerned. The basic criterion for social support is prolonged severe mental illness (usually at least 6 months), with no criteria for specific diagnosis or institutional history. The most common form of social support is 'support in daily living', a community care intervention for people aged 18 years or older who have their own homes and living arrangements. Aim: This article aims to deepen our understanding of user involvement at the individual level in the provision of an ongoing social work intervention. What elements of user involvement can be found in users' and support workers' descriptions of helpful support in daily living? Method: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 18 users, who had experienced support in daily living as helpful, and 16 interviews with the users' support workers. Results: Three major, interconnected themes emerged: Constant dialogue; Framing the flexibility, in relation to formalized intervention plans and regulations; The importance of 'small things', decisions concerning daily life. Conclusion: Both users and support workers described user involvement at the individual, micro-level to be an integral part of helpful support in daily living. It was possible to create a space for dialogue and co-creation in which users were involved in formulating and deciding the contents of their support at an informal level, to influence their own everyday lives. While a formal framework of rules, restrictions and plans surrounds meetings between users and professionals, a facilitating factor may be the absence of too detailed plans and regulations, leaving trust to users and professionals and their capacity to manage most of the choices they have to make.
In: Nordic Social Work Research, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 173-185
ISSN: 2156-8588
In: Nordic Social Work Research, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 201-210
ISSN: 2156-8588
In: The international journal of social psychiatry, Band 55, Heft 4, S. 336-347
ISSN: 1741-2854
Background: Recovery research often describes recovery from mental illness as a complex individual process. In this article a social perspective on recovery is developed. Aims: To ascertain which factors people regard as decisive to their own recovery and what makes them beneficial. Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted with 58 persons in Sweden who had recovered from severe mental illness. Interviews were qualitatively analyzed using grounded theory. Results: Three dimensions of contributing recovery factors were identified. Social relationships emerged as the core category throughout these dimensions. Conclusions: The results show that recovery processes are social processes in which social relationships play a key role.
From being a concept questioning the core of psychiatric knowledge and practice, recovery has been adopted as a guiding vison for mental health policy and practice by different local, national, and international organizations. The aim of this article is to contextualize the different understandings of recovery and its psychiatrization through the emergence of an individualizing and de-contextualized definition which have gained a dominant position. It ends with an attempt to formulate a new definition of recovery which integrates people in their social context. Research results from various follow-up studies showing the possibility of recovery from severe mental distress have stressed the importance of societal, social and relational factors as well of the person's own agency when facing their distress and reactions from their environment. These researches were published in the 1970s and 80s; a period of struggle for liberation from colonialism, of struggle by women and black people for their civil rights, and a time of de-institutionalization of services directed toward the poor, elderly, handicapped, prisoners, and people with mental health problems. Recovery research pointed at the central role of individuals in their recovery journey and it was understood as a personal process in a social context. However, with neo-liberal political agenda, the personal role of individuals and their own responsibility for their well-being was stressed, and contextual understandings and the role of social, material and cultural changes to promote recovery faded away. Thus, during recent decades recovery has been mostly defined as an individualistic journey of changing the persons and their perception of their situation, but not of changing this situation. Contextual aspects are almost absent. The most quoted definition accepts the limits posed by an illness-based model. This kind of definition might be a reason for the wide acceptance of a phenomenon that was initially experienced as a break with the bio-medical paradigm. ...
BASE
In: Tidsskrift for psykisk helsearbeid, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 255-259
ISSN: 1504-3010
In: Tidsskrift for psykisk helsearbeid, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 272-282
ISSN: 1504-3010
In: Tidsskrift for psykisk helsearbeid, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 283-294
ISSN: 1504-3010
In: Tidsskrift for psykisk helsearbeid, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 260-271
ISSN: 1504-3010
In: Scandinavian journal of disability research, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 353-365
ISSN: 1745-3011