Whom is the European Central Bank the Central Bank of?: Reaction to Zilioli and Selmayr
In: Common Market Law Review, Band 36, Heft 6, S. 1229-1241
ISSN: 0165-0750
14 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Common Market Law Review, Band 36, Heft 6, S. 1229-1241
ISSN: 0165-0750
In: Interrogar la actualidad [8]
In: Serie América Latina
World Affairs Online
The perception of the present state of trade relations with Chile is obscured by a lack of adequate understanding of its legal framework as well as of the policy behind it. This study attempts to clarify the present state of and future prospects for trade between the EU and Chile through an examination of previous agreements and the EU's new approach to trade liberalisation. The authors agree with the large consensus existing on both the EU and Chilean sides regarding the efficacy of the Association Agreement, but note that any extension of an agreement with Chile should capture the spirit of older EU agreements rather than simply following the 'NAFTA route'. The study also includes a comparative analysis between the EU-Chile agreement and current trade agreements being negotiated by the EU and Chile with third countries.
BASE
Study for the EU Parliament co-authored by Rodrigo Polanco: The 1997 Global Agreement between the EC and its Member States and Mexico, together with the set of decisions taken in its framework, has been effective, and thus modifications of the agreement are mainly motivated by changes in the global landscape since it was first enacted. Therefore, broad considerations on how the European Union (EU) trade policy is shaped are extremely relevant for the upcoming negotiations with Mexico. In this context, the needs and expectations, both from the EU and Mexico, regarding any further agreements are examined, focusing in particular on areas beyond trade in goods and services such as procurement, investment, and regulatory cooperation. It is argued that the 'old' Association Agreements should be taken as models for any modifications, given their emphasis on EU-specific issues and their ability to accommodate the needs of Mexico in any deepened agreement.
BASE
In: Society of International Economic Law (SIEL), 3rd Biennial Global Conference
SSRN
Working paper
In: Common Market Law Review, Band 54, Heft 5, S. 1319-1358
ISSN: 0165-0750
Provisions on investment in the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada and the EU, both on substance and on dispute settlement procedures, are the culmination of a long process of replacement of the original EEC approach to establishment by the approaches followed by the GATS, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs). The article analyses this process; it focuses in particular on the law of external relations but takes into account the evolution of the law of the internal market and can also be read from this perspective as, in the authors' opinion, the evolution in the former throws light on the latter. The article intends to leave the legal facts to speak by themselves. By unveiling their rationale, it also gives rise to political concerns regarding the evolution of the law. As CETA limits the ability of the EU to legislate and erodes the ECJ's role, the article leads to the conclusion that the underlying rationale for the evolution, both in the internal and the external areas, has not been that of promoting integration but that of deregulation.
In: Studia diplomatica: Brussels journal of international relations, Band 58, Heft 3, S. 1-142
ISSN: 0770-2965
World Affairs Online
In: Studia diplomatica: Brussels journal of international relations, Band 58, Heft 3, S. 5-6
ISSN: 0770-2965
Provisions on investment in the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada and the EU, both on substance and on dispute settlement procedures, are the culmination of a long process of replacement of the original EEC approach to establishment by the approaches followed by the GATS, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs). The article analyses this process; it focuses in particular on the law of external relations but takes into account the evolution of the law of the internal market and can also be read from this perspective as, in the authors' opinion, the evolution in the former throws light on the latter. The article intends to leave the legal facts to speak by themselves. By unveiling their rationale, it also gives rise to political concerns regarding the evolution of the law. As CETA limits the ability of the EU to legislate and erodes the ECJ's role, the article leads to the conclusion that the underlying rationale for the evolution, both in the internal and the external areas, has not been that of promoting integration but that of deregulation.
BASE
In: Studia diplomatica: Brussels journal of international relations, Band 58, Heft 3, S. 5-6
ISSN: 0770-2965
Introduces a special issue on future relations between the European Union and countries of the Andean Region of South America.
In: Bocconi Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2570596
SSRN
Working paper
World Affairs Online
In: América Problema, 19
World Affairs Online