Suchergebnisse

Introduction : Gramsci, ce célèbre inconnu -- 1. Trois portaits de Gramsci en intellectuel politique -- 2. Quasi système et histoire dans les cahiers de prison -- 3. Antonio Gramsci : quel socialisme ? Quel communisme ? -- 4. La philosophie de la praxis entre conception du monde, religion, idéologie, sens commun -- 5. Survie et création en prison -- 6. L'hégémonie comme pédagogie: formation de la volonté collective et de la personnalité individuelle

To understand the original way of thinking about "real democracy" in Gramsci it is necessary to reconstruct two "sequences" strictly connected: the sequence of the "theory" of the relations of force that depict the present hegemony as a form of unstable equilibrium; the sequence of the "philology" of the functional ideological schemata that, deriving from the different forms of common sense, turn into the (still unstable, though) philosophy of praxis. Moreover: Gramsci as a politician translates himself into Gramsci as philosopher and vice versa. This original, internal self-translation is the form of its absolute and immanent historicism. The non-stability of the two sequences derives from the core issue of Gramsci's investigation, i.e. the problem of "time of history" – how to understand regularity, law, automatism, necessity: that is the crux of philosophies and naturalistic sciences. Gramsci opens up the path for a new type of "science" that bind together continuity, development and strategy, that means political will. In this framework, dialectics is a transforming and developing form of knowledge and not a closed one. Real history cannot be conceived of as an already-made history, but as a developing process, as a "structure in abyss". Keywords: Gramsci; Philosophy; Politics; Translatability; History.

In this interview, André Tosel recalls the most important phases of his scientific commitment. He focuses on the different aspects of his theoretical experiences: the left-wing Catholicism, his meeting with Althusser (who shows him the analytical path from Spinoza to Marx), his discovery of Gramsci's role in the Marxist historicism. Tosel emphasizes the differences between Althusser and Gramsci, recognizing the Italian Marxist – an author not sufficiently studied in France – as a point of reference for the elaboration of a critical analysis of the structure of the contemporary capitalism. Of course, according to Tosel, such an appreciation of Gramsci's work does not exclude critical evaluations of his contribution. Keywords: Marx, Historical materialism, Spinoza, Althusser, Gramsci, Religion, Hegemony, Languages and practices of the resilience.