Suchergebnisse

Intro -- Title Page -- About the Editors -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- Applying Resilience to Hybrid Threats: Integrating Infrastructural, Digital, and Social Systems -- Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems to Hybrid Threats with Information Disruption -- A Framework for ICT Resilience -- Digital Resilience for Naval Software and Missions -- Emerging Challenges and Threats to Digital Information and Information Systems -- On the Sensitivity of Cyber Assessment Methodologies -- Cyber-Trust: The Shield for IoT Cyber-Attacks -- Network-Resilience Modeling and Intrusion Detection -- Challenges and Advances in Adversarial Machine Learning -- The Ethics of Algorithm Errors -- Political and Social Resilience -- Terrorism, Messaging and Mindset: Resounding Lessons from Hamas' Leader -- A Novel Approach Towards Integrated Interdisciplinary Research in Disaster Risk Reduction and Emergency Management: The Case of Israel and General Implications -- Organizational Resilience and C2 -- Successful External Interference Requires Domestic Confederates -- How to Build Resilient News Infrastructures? Reflections on Information Provision in Times of "Fake News -- Breaking Down "Fake News": Differences Between Misinformation, Disinformation, Rumors, and Propaganda -- Author Index.

Nanotechnologies have reached maturity and market penetration that require nano-specific changes in legislation and harmonization among legislation domains, such as the amendments to REACH for nanomaterials (NMs) which came into force in 2020. Thus, an assessment of the components and regulatory boundaries of NMs risk governance is timely, alongside related methods and tools, as part of the global efforts to optimise nanosafety and integrate it into product design processes, via Safe(r)-by-Design (SbD) concepts. This paper provides an overview of the state-of-the-art regarding risk governance of NMs and lays out the theoretical basis for the development and implementation of an effective, trustworthy and transparent risk governance framework for NMs. The proposed framework enables continuous integration of the evolving state of the science, leverages best practice from contiguous disciplines and facilitates responsive re-thinking of nanosafety governance to meet future needs. To achieve and operationalise such framework, a science-based Risk Governance Council (RGC) for NMs is being developed. The framework will provide a toolkit for independent NMs' risk governance and integrates needs and views of stakeholders. An extension of this framework to relevant advanced materials and emerging technologies is also envisaged, in view of future foundations of risk research in Europe and globally.