Suchergebnisse

This paper aims at analysing the policy and legal framework of joint study programmes in Eastern Partnership countries (EaP countries) in frames of the standards of the European Higher Education Area and providing the recommendations on its enhancement. It is concluded that the internationalization of higher education has been considered as one of the critical priorities of the educational policy in EaP countries. However, more emphasis on the role of joint study programmes is needed. The level of specification of legislative requirements on joint study programmes in EaP countries differs. The educational laws in Georgia, Moldova include special provisions devoted to joint study programmes, in Ukraine – basic framework, including the possibility to establish joint study programmes and awarding the joint degrees, while respective legislation in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Belarus – just general provisions regarding the international cooperation of higher educational institutions. It is suggested to implement the European Approach for Quality Assurance of Joint Programmes in national laws and regulations in EaP countries, first of all, in part of the definition of joint study programmes and the recognition of the accreditation decisions of foreign quality assurance agencies. ; Straipsnyje siekiama išanalizuoti Rytų partnerystės valstybių jungtinių studijų programų politinę ir teisinę sistemą, atsižvelgiant į Europos aukštojo mokslo erdvės standartus bei pateikiant rekomendacijas dėl jos tobulinimo. Straipsnyje daroma išvada, kad aukštojo mokslo tarptautinimas laikytinas vienu iš didžiausių prioritetų Rytų partnerystės švietimo politikoje, tačiau būtina daryti didesnį akcentą jungtinių studijų programų vaidmeniui. Rytų partnerystės šalyse teisiniai reikalavimai jungtinėms studijų programoms skiriasi. Į Gruzijos, Moldovos švietimo įstatymus yra įtrauktos specialios nuostatos, skirtos jungtinėms studijų programoms, Ukrainos švietimo teisiniame reglamentavime yra nuostatų, susijusių su galimybe sudaryti jungtines studijų programas ir suteikti jungtinius kvalifikacijos laipsnius, Armėnijos, Azerbaidžano ir Baltarusijos įstatymuose reglamentuojamos tik bendrosios nuostatos dėl tarptautinio aukštųjų mokyklų bendradarbiavimo. Siūloma, kad Rytų partnerystės valstybių nacionaliniais įstatymais ir kitais teisės aktais būtų įgyvendintas Europos požiūris į jungtinių programų kokybės užtikrinimą, pirmiausia iš dalies apibrėžiant jungtines studijų programas ir pripažįstant užsienio kokybės užtikrinimo agentūrų akreditavimo sprendimus.

For the moment, ECtHR is one of the most respected and effective human rights institutions, so its decisions have the potential to create a platform to optimize and improve the application of legal rules and legal relations in case of gaps in national law. The study of the civil law category of property rights in the context of ECtHR jurisprudence is a significant step towards modernizing the consciousness of modern Ukrainian society and unifying the regulation of issues related to property. The authors used the method of analysis and the synthesis method as well as the comparative legal method in this research. In conclusion, the authors highlighted that since ECtHR decisions are binding in the administration of justice in Ukraine, there are many problems regarding the correlation between the concepts of "property", "ownership", "intellectual property", etc. The Ukrainian legislator and the law enforcer need to adapt to the flexibility of these concepts to minimize the divergence of views on legal categories that play a decisive role in the exercise of the applicant's right to judicial protection.

This paper aims at analysing the policy and legal framework of joint study programmes in Eastern Partnership countries (EaP countries) in frames of the standards of the European Higher Education Area and providing the recommendations on its enhancement. It is concluded that the internationalization of higher education has been considered as one of the key priorities of the educational policy in EaP countries, however, more emphasis on the role of the joint study programmes is needed. The level of specification of legislative requirements on joint study programmes in EaP countries differs. The educational laws in Georgia, Moldova include special provisions devoted to joint study programmes, in Ukraine – basic framework, including the possibility to establish joint study programmes and awarding the joint degrees, while respective legislation in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Belarus – just general provisions regarding the international cooperation of higher educational institutions. It is suggested to implement the European Approach for Quality Assurance of Joint Programmes in national laws and regulations in EaP countries, first of all, in part of the definition of joint study programmes and the recognition of the accreditation decisions of foreign quality assurance agencies.

The article is based on provisions of current civil legislation, approaches formed in judicial practice, primarily of the Supreme Court, and achievements of domestic legal doctrine. The research is based on the interconnected use of general scientific and special legal methods, in particular methods of synthesis and analysis, formal-legal and logical-legal as well as hermeneutic methods. Based on the interpretation of the norm of Art. 204 of the Civil Code of Ukraine and the practice of the Supreme Court, in this study we substantiate that the presumption of legality of the transaction is applied to all transactions, regardless of the legal basis for declaring them invalid in the future. That is, the presumption of legality and the need to refute it, based on its nature as a legal concept, are applied in both cases: when the invalidity of the transaction is directly established by law (void transaction) or when it is recognized by the court as invalid (disputed or voidable transaction). This is indicated by the logic of the construction of Art. 204 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, which does not distinguish the grounds for the invalidity of the transaction from the point of view of the presumption of legality, stating them next to each other, as well as the conclusions of the Supreme Court, which establish the court's duty to investigate the factual circumstances with which the law connects the invalidity of the transaction, to establish their presence or absence, and, accordingly, to confirm or refute the voidness of the transaction declared by the party or interested person. This understanding of the content of the legal category of the presumption of legality of the transaction helps to ensure the predictability of relevant social relations, the stability of business turnover, and the domestic system of the law of obligations in general.

This paper aims at analysing the policy and legal framework of joint study programmes in Eastern Partnership countries (EaP countries) in frames of the standards of the European Higher Education Area and providing the recommendations on its enhancement. It is concluded that the internationalization of higher education has been considered as one of the key priorities of the educational policy in EaP countries, however, more emphasis on the role of the joint study programmes is needed. The level of specification of legislative requirements on joint study programmes in EaP countries differs. The educational laws in Georgia, Moldova include special provisions devoted to joint study programmes, in Ukraine – basic framework, including the possibility to establish joint study programmes and awarding the joint degrees, while respective legislation in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Belarus – just general provisions regarding the international cooperation of higher educational institutions. It is suggested to implement the European Approach for Quality Assurance of Joint Programmes in national laws and regulations in EaP countries, first of all, in part of the definition of joint study programmes and the recognition of the accreditation decisions of foreign quality assurance agencies.

Under uncertain conditions, the introduction of a state of emergency and quarantine measures, the scope of human rights may be subject to state interference and some rights cannot be exercised at all. The aim of the work is to examine the problem of the exercise of the right to freedom of movement and personal integrity in the context of COVID-19 through the practice of the European Court of Human Rights ECTHR. The theme of the study is the social relations that arise in the exercise of the right to freedom of movement and personal integrity in the COVID-19 pandemic. Research methods are the dialectical method, the method of system analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, modeling, comparison, generalization, and formalization. As a result of the study, the problems of the realization of the right to freedom of movement and personal inviolability in COVID-19 were analyzed through the prism of ECtHR decisions. The international experience of regulating the right to circular under quarantine conditions was clarified and suggested ways to solve this problem to protect human dignity.