N – National Interest
In: Russia in Global Affairs, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 108-112
ISSN: 2618-9844
21 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Russia in Global Affairs, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 108-112
ISSN: 2618-9844
In: Meždunarodnye processy: žurnal teorii meždunarodnych otnošenij i mirovoj politiki = International trends : journal of theory of international relations and world politics, Band 14, Heft 4(47)
In: Meždunarodnye processy: žurnal teorii meždunarodnych otnošenij i mirovoj politiki = International trends : journal of theory of international relations and world politics, Band 17, Heft 2(57)
In: European review of international studies: eris, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 92-106
ISSN: 2196-7415
In: Russian politics and law, Band 48, Heft 6, S. 19-34
ISSN: 1558-0962
In: Russian politics and law: a journal of translations, Band 48, Heft 6, S. 19-35
ISSN: 1061-1940
In: Geopolitics, Band 4, Heft 3, S. 47-72
ISSN: 1557-3028
In: Geopolitics, Band 4, Heft 3, S. 47-72
ISSN: 1465-0045
This paper studies the effects of Samuel Huntington's "Clash of Civilizations" thesis on Russian foreign policy discourse. In response to Huntington's thesis, two major currents of Russia's foreign policy thinking -- Liberals & Nationalists -- are identified, both of which are critical of the thesis. The two groups offer diametrically opposed alternatives to Huntington's paradigm of the post-Cold War world. The Liberal-Nationalist controversy reflects Russia's debates about its own political identity & provides us with a rich & informative understanding of the process of identity formation. By identifying Russia's various reactions to the "Clash of Civilizations" thesis, the paper identifies potential influences of various currents in Russian foreign policy thinking on the country's future foreign policy. It also suggests some implications for further studies of cultures/civilizations in international politics. 4 Tables. Adapted from the source document.
In: Russia in Global Affairs, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 68-76
ISSN: 2618-9844
In: Foreign policy analysis, Band 17, Heft 4
ISSN: 1743-8594
AbstractAs the world moves away from the West-centered international system, IR scholars are increasingly turning their attention to substance and formation of national values. Using the case of Russia, we show how distinct schools of IR theory and foreign policy dominant in the country have come to recognize the importance of national values as a lens through which to assess the country's means and goals of development. Each in its way, these schools—Civilizationists, Statists, and Westernizers—have prioritized "the national" in the country's future. We explain Russia's turn to the national by stressing the country's ontological insecurity, the role of the Russian state, and Western actions that contribute to creating and exacerbating the conditions of ontological insecurity. The case of Russia has important implications for understanding the role of national values in the formation of foreign policy and IR theory.
In: European journal of international relations, Band 16, Heft 4, S. 663-686
ISSN: 1460-3713
In an attempt to broaden our perspective on IR theory formation, this article seeks to highlight the significance of ideology. Consistent with the recently revived sociology of knowledge tradition in international studies, we view IR scholarship as grounded in certain social and ideological conditions. Although some scholars have studied the political, ideological, and epistemological biases of Western, particularly American, civilization, in order to achieve a better understanding of global patterns of knowledge formation it is important to look at cases beyond the West. We therefore look at the formation of IR knowledge in Russia, and we argue that the development of a Russian theory of international relations responds to the old debate on the 'Russian idea,' and three distinct ideological traditions that had been introduced to the national discourse in the mid-19th century. Focusing on theories and concepts of the international system, regional order, and foreign policy, as developed by Russian scholars, we attempt to demonstrate how they are shaped by ideological and therefore pre-theoretical assumptions about social reality.
In: European journal of international relations, Band 16, Heft 4, S. 663-687
ISSN: 1354-0661
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies
"Russian Theory of International Relations" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: International political sociology, Band 1, Heft 4, S. 307-324
ISSN: 1749-5687
In: Communist and post-communist studies, Band 37, Heft 1, S. 1-17
ISSN: 0967-067X
The essay argues that Western scholars can improve their understanding of the post-Soviet Russia by studying the discipline of new Russian international relations (IR). The other objective of the essay is to move away from the excessively West-centered IR scholarship by exploring indigenous Russian perceptions and inviting a dialogue across the globe. The essay identifies key trends in Russian IR reflective of the transitional nature of Russia's post-Soviet change. It argues that Russian IR continues to be in a stage of ideological and theoretical uncertainty, which is a result of unresolved questions of national identity. For describing Russia's identity crisis, the authors employ Erving Goffman's concept of stigma defined as a crisis of a larger social acceptance by Russia's ''significant other'' (West). The essay suggests that, until this crisis is resolved, much of Russian IR debates can be understood in terms of a search for a national idea. It also introduces the authors of the issue and summarizes their contribution to our understanding of Russian and Western IR.