The veiled sceptre: reserved powers of heads of state in Westminster systems
In: Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law
50 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law
In: The round table: the Commonwealth journal of international affairs, Band 112, Heft 4, S. 367-375
ISSN: 1474-029X
In: Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 19/79
SSRN
Working paper
In: A. Twomey, 'Pitt Cobbett - A Portrait of Australia's Consitution at 1919' in A. Twomey (ed.), "William Pitt Cobbett, The Constitution and Government of Australia, 1788 to 1919", The Federation Press, Sydney, 2019
SSRN
In: The round table: the Commonwealth journal of international affairs, Band 107, Heft 4, S. 417-428
ISSN: 1474-029X
In: Public Law Review, Band 27, Heft 3, S. 198-217
SSRN
In: Public Law Review, Band 27, Heft 2, S. 144-154
SSRN
In: Sydney Law Review, Band 38, Heft 2, S. 231-241
SSRN
In: Australasian Parliamentary Review, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 31-47
SSRN
In: Public Law Review, Band 26, Heft 3, S. 193-216
SSRN
In: Sydney Law Review, Band 37, Heft 2, S. 275-286
SSRN
In: Australian Bar Review, Band 39, Heft 2, S. 198-214
SSRN
In: Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 14/32
SSRN
Working paper
In: Sydney Law Review, Band 36, Heft 3, S. 381-411
SSRN
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 62, Heft 2, S. 317-343
ISSN: 1471-6895
AbstractThe debate on the recognition of Indigenous Australians in the Australian Constitution is more about how, than whether, this should occur. The two main proposals involve the use of a preamble. One proposes symbolic recognition in a new constitutional preamble with a clause prohibiting use of the preamble in constitutional interpretation. The other would give Parliament power to make laws with respect to Indigenous Australians, but qualify it in a preamble so that it could only be exercised for their 'advancement'. This article draws on comparative experience of the use of preambles in other common law countries to challenge the assumptions underlying each proposal.