Suchergebnisse

The Study Report and Draft Environmental Impact Statement was made available to the public on March 5, 1996, and a 90-day public comment period was held. This Study Report and Final Environmental Impact Statement has reconfirmed that Alternative E, which recommends designation of East Eagle Creek and Five Points Creek to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System with USDA Forest Service Administration is the preferred alternative.

Prepared for transition officials of the new Administration. ; "February 1993." ; Cover title. ; Executive summary -- USFS mission, vision, and guiding principles -- Strategic direction and planning -- USFS history, organization, and authorities -- Description of programs -- Budget, partnership, and workforce information -- Topic papers -- Legislation and the Congress -- Key contacts and intergovernmental coordination. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Revision of circular originally published as B.P.I.--706. ; Forestry law leaflets no. 1- are Misc. S.--2-17, 20-22, 24- Each number is devoted to the laws of a special state. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Another scene on Southern Pine Lumber Company's logging operation - This tract is adjacent to their present sale on the Walnut Compartment of he Davy Crockett National forest - Big Timber in center background is just across line on Government land. Photographer: Unknown ; https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/nfgt_general/1051/thumbnail.jpg

"This publication supersedes Department Circular 211, Government Forest Work, issued in April 1922." ; "Originally issued January 1938." ; Cover title. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; 2

"This publication supersede3s Department Circular 211, Government Forest Work, issued in April 1922." ; "Originally issued January 1938." ; Cover title. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; 2

Issued Jan. 1932 ; Rev. Jan. 1939. ; Caption title. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; 2

Mimeographed. ; Montana. - Oregon. - North Carolina. - New Hampshire. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Association: Cooper-Molera papers. ; Title varies: 1905, The use of the national forest reserves. Regulations and instructions. 1906, The use book; regulations and instructions for the use of the national forest reserves. 1907-08, The use book; regulations and instructions for the use of the national forests. 1913-1915, The use book; a manual for users of the national forests. 1918, The use book; a manual of information about the national forests. ; 1915, 1918 are Misc. F-1, Misc. F-3. ; 1913, 1915, 1918 prepared especially for forest users. cf. Transmission note. ; Two editions in 1908. One called Administrative edition. ; At head of title: U.S. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Introductory.--Extracts from reports of the commissioners of the land office.--The government in its relation to forests, by E.J. James.--Report on the forest conditions of the Rocky Mountains, by E.T. Ensign.--Forest flora of the Rocky Mountains, by G.B. Sudworth.--Report on the forests of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and San Diego counties, Cal., by Abbott Kinney.--Trees and shrubs of San Diego County, Cal.--The needs of the Yellowstone national park, by Arnold Hague.--Summary of legislation for the preservation of timber or forests on the public domain, by N.H. Egleston.--The climate of colorado and its effects upon trees, by G.H. Parsons.--Snow-slides or avalanches, their formation and prevention, by B.E. Fernow. ; Mode of access: Internet.

At head of caption title: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. Forest Service. District 5. ; Cover-title. ; Mode of access: Internet.

"*U.S. Government Printing Office: 2002--773-082 / 42108 Region no. 8."--P. 64. ; Cover title. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Forest ecosystems will face direct and indirect impacts from a changing climate over the 21st century. This assessment evaluates the vulnerability of forest ecosystems across the New England region (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, northern New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont) under a range of future climates. We synthesized and summarized information on the contemporary landscape, provided information on past climate trends, and described a range of projected future climates. This information was used to parameterize and run multiple vegetation impact models, which provided a range of potential vegetative responses to climate. Finally, we brought these results before a multidisciplinary panel of scientists and natural resource professionals familiar with the forests of this region to assess ecosystem vulnerability through a formal consensus-based expert elicitation process. Observed trends in climate over the historical record from 1901 through 2011 show that the mean annual temperature has increased across the region by 2.4 °F, with even greater warming during winter. Precipitation patterns also changed during this time, with a slight trend toward greater annual precipitation and a substantial increase in extreme precipitation events. Projected climate trends using downscaled global climate model data indicate a potential increase in mean annual temperature of 3 to 8 °F for the assessment area by 2100. Projections for precipitation indicate an increase in fall and winter precipitation, and spring and summer precipitation projections vary by scenario. We identified potential impacts on forests by incorporating these future climate projections into three forest impact models (DISTRIB, LINKAGES, and LANDIS PRO). Model projections suggest that many northern and boreal species, including balsam fir, red spruce, and black spruce, may fare worse under future conditions, but other species may benefit from projected changes in climate. Published literature on climate impacts related to wildfire, invasive species, and forest pests and diseases also contributed to the overall determination of climate change vulnerability. We assessed vulnerability for eight forest communities in the assessment area. The assessment was conducted through a formal elicitation process with 20 scientists and resource managers from across the area, who considered vulnerability in terms of the potential impacts and the adaptive capacity for an individual community. Mont ...