Suchergebnisse

The objective of this text is to critically analyze the question: what is social innovation from a gender perspective?, with emphasis, above all, on the purpose of innovation. The concrete answer to the question would be: it is the one that responds to the challenges and needs of citizens. Today's questions must focus on the why, how, with whom and what of public innovation. Innovation represents an ecosystem of interactions and its mediation and purpose must be none other than the improvement and dignification of the lives of the groups to whom it is addressed. For this reason, the contrast of ideas and foundations is proposed as a methodological narrative that connects actors/actresses and diverse scenarios and invites action. The result? To insist that public innovation is either social or it is not; and it is linked to the gender perspective, or it is neither innovation, nor social, ... nor public.

Introduction

This paper shows the process followed to prepare the evaluation of the III Canary Plan on Drug Addiction, published in 2018 and which has served as the basis for the current IV Canary Plan on Addictions (2020-2024). The importance of this evaluation is that a system has been applied based on an adequate methodological triangulation aimed at solving different obstacles related to the adequate monitoring of the contents of the III Plan, both when executing the actions in terms of prevention and drug treatment. To this end, different recommendations regarding evaluation were taken into account at all times, as well as the different powers that the different Public Administrations have in terms of addictions. Therefore, by applying different social research techniques to the evaluation process, it was possible to carry out the evaluation of the III Canary Plan on Drug Addiction.

El reciente debate sobre la viabilidad de diseñar un nuevo criterio de demarcación para limitar el papel de los valores no deseados en la práctica tecnocientífica aborda diferentes estrategias. Se presenta como punto de partida que este problema no puede ser delimitado con criterios de demarcación fijos, ya que el rol de los valores es una cuestión abierta, contextual y sujeta a la evaluación crítica y situada. En este artículo se propone recuperar algunos de los resultados de la filosofía feminista de la ciencia para avanzar en un marco general de propuestas y estrategias que, de forma combinada y desde una perspectiva filosófica pragmatista, puedan incrementar el rigor, integridad y confiabilidad de la práctica tecnocientífica, y dirigirla hacia metas ética y democráticamente defendibles.

"The term "resignification" leads us to a conceptualization that involves an act of granting a new meaning or, of a change of interpretive meaning, to actions, contexts, and experiences. This means that the resignification supposes to confer a value, or a meaning different from the one used to the circumstances to which it is applied. Thus, giving new meaning to experiences consists in assigning another meaning to them, and it should be added that assigning a new meaning to lived experiences is the end of a process that is carried out from another perspective. Giving new meaning, then, is fundamental for the transformation of the perception of the lived contexts themselves and their implications. The punctual and discontinuous moments of the assumed experience of the «moments of being» are transformed, to dignify them or, on the contrary, to devalue them. In this work, certain future projections are analyzed, which are considered not only as possible, but also as desirable. It is about seeing if the promised futures are such or if they continue to be a part of a present of inequalities."

Gender studies are an indisputable contribution to pedagogy and epistemology-oriented innovation. In this regard, the meaning conferred to the concept of innovation is gradually defined. To innovate is to retake, with a transforming will, the best of the legacy and to dismiss the outdated, it is to give and legitimize the voices of those silenced by history and give them the possibility to rewrite the forgotten; also to innovate demands to make visible and viralize reality, to validate pedagogical proposals that have as a driving force the struggle for dignities, that do not turn their backs on the climate and ecological crisis. In this regard, it is essential to analyze the link between Pedagogy and Literature, disciplines that converge in their political dimension from an ecocritical and gynocritical approach to the written legacy and new textualizations, capable of generating a polyphonic chorus that can transgress the limits imposed by a predominantly male canon.

Review