Does the End Use of Remittance Matter? - A Macro Simulation of the Nigerian Economy
In: Developing Country Studies. Vol 2, No.10, 2012
11 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Developing Country Studies. Vol 2, No.10, 2012
SSRN
In: Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, ISSN 2222-1700 (Paper), ISSN 2222-2855 (Online), Vol. 3, No. 6, 2012
SSRN
Working paper
In: European Journal of Scientific Research, ISSN 1450-216X / 1450-202X Vol. 138 No 3 March, 2016, pp.139-144
SSRN
In: Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development. Vol. 2, No. 4, 2011
SSRN
In: European Journal of Business and Management, ISSN 2222-1905 (Paper), ISSN 2222-2839 (Online), Vol. 4, No.10, 2012
SSRN
Working paper
In: Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, Band Vol.3, Heft 10, S. 203
SSRN
In: International migration: quarterly review, Band 57, Heft 4, S. 151-166
ISSN: 1468-2435
AbstractStatistics show that remittances inflow to Nigeria grew from US$3,000,000 in 1978 to over US$22 billion in 2017. Theoretically, such a large inflow of foreign currency into an economy may lead to Dutch diseases. This study, therefore, investigated whether the massive inflow of remittances into the economy causes Dutch disease. Given that the model had both I(0) and I(1) variables, ARDL/Bound testing methodology was used with annual data from 1981 to 2016. The ARDL result showed that migrant remittances have a significant positive effect on the real effective exchange rate in Nigeria in the long run. Specifically, a one per cent increase in the inflows of remittances increases the real effective exchange rate of Naira by 0.44 per cent in the long run. This appreciation of the Nigerian Naira relative to other competing nations encourages import and discourages export, leading to the Dutch disease effect.
In: International Migration, Band 54(4)
SSRN
In: Asian Economic and Financial Review, Band 3, Heft 12, S. 1670-1680
SSRN
In: International migration: quarterly review, Band 55, Heft 1, S. 37-50
ISSN: 1468-2435
AbstractThe study analyses how remittances to Nigeria affect the labour supply of recipients using Propensity Score Matching (PSM) and a Log‐Linear regression model, with data from the 2013 Nigerian General Household Survey. The PSM results show that for the entire sample, the difference between the average amount of labour supplied per week by those that receive remittances and the amount they would have supplied without remittances is insignificant. The marginal impact analysis also shows that, ceteris paribus, the average labour supply for all recipients is inelastic to remittances. The results from the sub‐group analysis, however, show that receiving remittances negatively affects the labour supply of the self‐employed in agriculture, teenagers and the elderly. These results led us to the recommendation that policies to increase the inflow of remittances should be encouraged but in tandem with programmes to educate farmers on the benefit of investing remittances received in their farming business.
In: Forum for social economics, Band 52, Heft 1, S. 1-21
ISSN: 1874-6381