Suchergebnisse

Despite the fact that a comprehensive analysis of digitalization processes in the EU member states has been carried out, the impact of a country's digitalization level on the risks of poverty and social exclusion requires further investigation. The purpose of the paper is to verify a hypothesis that a higher level of national digitalization provides positive trends in reducing the risks of poverty and social exclusion for the population. The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) was used to evaluate the digitalization levels of the EU countries. The indicator "People at risk of poverty or social exclusion" (AROPE) was applied to estimate the poverty level. As the main research methods, the authors used a comparative and correlation analysis with respect to the above-mentioned indicators, as well as the Monte Carlo method in order to evaluate the probability of a change in the indicator "population at risk of poverty or social exclusion" in 2021. The EU countries with higher digitalization levels have a lower percentage of the population at risk of poverty and social exclusion. However, a higher digitalization level of the EU member states does not provide an accelerated risk reduction of poverty and social exclusion. Statistical calculations with respect to the entire population of these countries mainly indicate reverse processes. At the same time, a further reduction of poverty and social exclusion level is less probable in the countries with a higher level of digitalization. For relatively poor segments of the population (the 1st and 2nd quintiles by income) in the EU member states, the level of digitalization does not play a significant role. For relatively wealthy segments of the population (the 3rd and 4th quintiles by income) the authors noticed a pattern: the higher the level of digitalization is, the lower the risk of poverty and social exclusion becomes. A pairwise comparison of countries with initially similar AROPE values showed that in most cases (3 out of 5), the countries with higher levels of digitalization showed a more significant reduction in poverty and social exclusion. However, the probability of further positive changes in this area is higher for the countries with a lower level of digitalization.

The work is devoted to the analysis of the phenomenon of dignity, which is studied by modern sociohumanitarian sciences as an orientation of moral consciousness and expresses the idea of the value of each person as a unique individual, as well as a special moral attitude of the individual to himself and the expectation of an appropriate response to the respectful attitude towards him by the society in which his value is recognized. We have established that dignity is primarily a form of self-awareness and self-control, which is the basis of a person's demands on himself or herself, and is closely related to such personality traits as conscience, honor, and responsibility. The concept of dignity is considered in the modern socio-philosophical discourse in the context of the value orientations of representatives of Ukrainian society and determines their patriotic behavior, which is especially in demand in the threatening conditions of martial law, which can deform the personality. Therefore, it is extremely important for the philosophical understanding of human dignity that all human abilities and preferences are involved in its production, and that value becomes a phenomenon of internal choice. The Russian narratives of the "little brother" and "peasantry" were aimed at the dignity of the entire nation, which in the war earned the respect of the whole world. It is established that the main characteristics of Ukrainian society are expressed by three key words: courage, resilience and solidarity, and therefore the author focuses on the etymology of the word victory, since it is in this desire for victory that human dignity is reflected in the consciousness of every Ukrainian. The author substantiates the social mechanisms of influence on the observance of human rights in war, on the preservation of dignity and the protection of dignity in the circumstances of new risks of the Russian-Ukrainian war.

The article is devoted to the justification of the introduction of a special system of knowledge about war into the renewed system of higher education of Ukraine, its connection with the modern armed world, the policy of the ruling circles of aggressive states with the aim of intellectual resistance to war based on a deep understanding of its socio-political and humanitarian aspects. Russian aggression against Ukraine has created an existential danger for Ukrainians, the meaning of which is not only an attempt to implement the shameful statement "I will destroy you", but also an encroachment on the world order and the right for security. The authors insist that the initial knowledge at the level of the school program for the protection of the Motherland and the minimum knowledge about war ("tinitet") is not enough to understand the essence, content, anti-human consequences of new modes of wars - unprovoked aggressions and wars of the "new generation". The authors focus on the fact that the idea of creating a polemology course by the French thinker G. Butul was distorted by Russian interpreters, who began to see war as an "effective way of communication between civilizations" and justified it as a "substitute" in a "softer form of "special operations", denied rational, de-ideological knowledge of the meaning and consequences of wars, which would serve the transition to a just peace and a peaceful dialogue of cultures. The totality of such knowledge is due to the filling of scientific gaps in the development of the "Polemology" course, which is based on the empirical facts of past wars and everyday armed struggle. The article emphasizes the creation of a synthetic system of knowledge that combines the work of political conflictology, military science, social psychology and other rational ways of understanding war, including the generating ideas of works of art and military diaries of combatants, so that this knowledge has epistemological value and moral-political focus on intellectual resistance to the occupiers.