The Manufacture-for-use of Pornography and Women's Inequality*
In: The journal of political philosophy, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 174-193
ISSN: 1467-9760
11 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The journal of political philosophy, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 174-193
ISSN: 1467-9760
In: The journal of political philosophy, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 174-193
ISSN: 0963-8016
In: Hypatia: a journal of feminist philosophy, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 159-161
ISSN: 1527-2001
Patrick Hopkins has claimed that SM is compatible with feminist principles. I argue that his account relies on both mistaken analogies and an untenable account of the allegedly changed meaning of SM scenes.1
In: Hypatia: a journal of feminist philosophy, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 94-109
ISSN: 1527-2001
The Supreme Court dismissed the Pornography/Civil Rights Ordinance as an unconstitutional restriction of speech. The Court's dismissal itself violates the free speech of the proposers of the Ordinance. It is not possible for both pornographers to perform the speech act of making pornography and feminists to perform the speech act of proposing the Ordinance. I show that the speech act of proposing the Ordinance takes First Amendment precedence over the speech act of making pornography.
In: Hypatia: a journal of feminist philosophy, Band 3, Heft 2, S. 174-177
ISSN: 1527-2001
In: The women's review of books, Band 11, Heft 5, S. 4