Recent Flattening in the Higher Education Wage Premium: Polarization, Skill Downgrading, or Both?
In: NBER Working Paper No. w22935
37 results
Sort by:
In: NBER Working Paper No. w22935
SSRN
Working paper
In: IZA journal of labor policy, Volume 4, Issue 1
ISSN: 2193-9004
In: IZA journal of labor policy, Volume 3, Issue 1
ISSN: 2193-9004
Abstract
In response to the 2007–09 "Great Recession," the maximum duration of U.S. unemployment benefits was increased from the normal level of 26 weeks to an unprecedented 99 weeks. I estimate the impact of these extensions on job search, comparing them with the more limited extensions associated with the milder 2001 recession. The analyses rely on monthly matched microdata from the Current Population Survey. I find that a 10-week extension of UI benefits raises unemployment duration by about 1.5 weeks, with little variation across the two episodes. This estimate lies in the middle-to-upper end of the range of past estimates.
JEL codes
J64; J65
In: Social science journal: official journal of the Western Social Science Association, Volume 50, Issue 3, p. 386-387
ISSN: 0362-3319
In: The American economist: journal of the International Honor Society in Economics, Omicron Delta Epsilon, Volume 58, Issue 1, p. 60-61
ISSN: 2328-1235
In: Journal of labor economics: JOLE, Volume 17, Issue S4, p. S170-S197
ISSN: 1537-5307
In: Journal of labor economics: JOLE, Volume 11, Issue 3, p. 545-574
ISSN: 1537-5307
In: The journal of human resources, Volume 26, Issue 4, p. 726
ISSN: 1548-8004
In: IZA Discussion Paper No. 10194
SSRN
SSRN
In: IZA Discussion Paper No. 8247
SSRN
Working paper
In: Journal of policy analysis and management: the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Volume 36, Issue 4, p. 880-908
ISSN: 1520-6688
AbstractMany Unemployment Insurance (UI) recipients do not find new jobs before exhausting their benefits, even when benefits are extended during recessions. Using Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) panel data covering the 2001 and 2007 to 2009 recessions and their aftermaths, we identify individuals whose jobless spells outlasted their UI benefits (exhaustees) and examine household income, program participation, and health‐related outcomes during the six months following UI exhaustion. For the average exhaustee, the loss of UI benefits is only slightly offset by increased participation in other safety net programs (e.g., food stamps), and family poverty rates rise substantially. Self‐reported disability also rises following UI exhaustion. These patterns do not vary dramatically across household demographic groups, broad income level prior to job loss, or the two business cycles. The results highlight the unique, important role of UI in the U.S. social safety net.
In: NBER Working Paper No. w23528
SSRN
Working paper
In: IZA Discussion Paper No. 8022
SSRN
Working paper
In: The journal of human resources, Volume 50, Issue 4, p. 873-909
ISSN: 1548-8004