Rebound policy in the Paris Agreement: instrument comparison and climate-club revenue offsets
In: Climate policy, Band 17, Heft 6, S. 801-813
ISSN: 1752-7457
24 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Climate policy, Band 17, Heft 6, S. 801-813
ISSN: 1752-7457
In: Environmental and resource economics, Band 48, Heft 1, S. 43-58
ISSN: 1573-1502
There is currently much hope about environmental innovation and green technologies, notably as a response to the threat of climate change. This paper offers a critical perspective on the role of technological innovation to solving environmental problems, based on considering empirical economic studies, energy and environmental rebound, the energy return on energy investment (EROEI) of alternative energy technologies, and various crowding out effects. Features of green technologies and motives of green innovators are briefly discussed. This is followed by an examination of the desirable mix of environmental and innovation policies to stimulate environmental innovation, to escape current and to evade early new lock-ins, and to avoid the occurrence of a green paradox. This involves an evaluation of specific policy instruments from an environmental innovation angle. An extended argument is offered to clarify that environmental (CO2) pricing is crucial - even though insufficient - for environmental innovation to deliver definite solutions. In other words, environmental innovation (policy) is no substitute for environmental regulation (through prices). The paper also discusses the importance for environmental innovation of international agreements for regulation of greenhouse gas emissions and international coordination of innovation efforts.
BASE
In: Marine policy: the international journal of ocean affairs, Band 26, Heft 1, S. 59
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: Environmental and resource economics, Band 3, Heft 4, S. 395-412
ISSN: 1573-1502
In: Journal of Industrial Ecology, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 10-19
SSRN
In: International environmental agreements: politics, law and economics, Band 13, Heft 3, S. 225-249
ISSN: 1573-1553
In: Environmental and resource economics, Band 49, Heft 2, S. 263-304
ISSN: 1573-1502
In: Kyklos: international review for social sciences, Band 50, Heft 1, S. 29-46
ISSN: 1467-6435
In: Climate policy, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 76-85
ISSN: 1752-7457
In: Environmental and resource economics, Band 58, Heft 1, S. 1-33
ISSN: 1573-1502
In: Environmental and resource economics, Band 38, Heft 1, S. 135-153
ISSN: 1573-1502
In: Environmental and resource economics, Band 36, Heft 1, S. 113-141
ISSN: 1573-1502
Most insights of environmental economics are in line with the standard neo-classical economic model of rational behaviour, formulated in terms of maximisation of utility in general, or profits in particular. The standard theory of environmental policy is a case in point. However, the maximisation hypothesis and its methodological foundation have been criticised on many grounds, related to a lack of either logical or empirical content. Moreover, over the years great many alternative models of behaviour have been proposed. Both criticism and alternatives are surveyed here. In the context of environmental economics behavioural assumptions have been most significant for the development of economic valuation theory and environmental policy theory. The focus here will be on environmental policy theory.
BASE
In: Environment & Policy; Understanding Industrial Transformation, S. 119-140