The Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty: Issues, Debates and Future Implications
In: International Law - Book Archive pre-2000
75 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International Law - Book Archive pre-2000
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
"The Maastricht Treaty: Creating the European Union" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
"The Common Foreign and Security Policy" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 52, Heft 2, S. 280-286
ISSN: 1460-3691
In an important article on the state of European Union (EU) foreign policy research, Keuleers, Fonck and Keukeleire show that academics excessively focus on the study of the EU foreign policy system and EU implementation rather than the consequences of EU foreign policy for recipient countries. While the article is empirical, based on a dataset of 451 published articles on EU foreign policy, the normative message is that it is time to stop 'navel-gazing' and pay more attention to those on the receiving end of EU foreign policy. We welcome this contribution, but wonder why certain research questions have been privileged over others. We argue that this has primarily to do with the predominant puzzles of the time. We also invite Keuleers, Fonck and Keukeleire to make a theoretical case for a research agenda with more attention to outside-in approaches. We conclude by briefly reflecting on future research agendas in EU foreign policy.
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Band 54, Heft S1, S. 204-217
ISSN: 1468-5965
In an important article on the state of European Union (EU) foreign policy research, Keuleers, Fonck and Keukeleire show that academics excessively focus on the study of the EU foreign policy system and EU implementation rather than the consequences of EU foreign policy for recipient countries. While the article is empirical, based on a dataset of 451 published articles on EU foreign policy, the normative message is that it is time to stop 'navel-gazing' and pay more attention to those on the receiving end of EU foreign policy. We welcome this contribution, but wonder why certain research questions have been privileged over others. We argue that this has primarily to do with the predominant puzzles of the time. We also invite Keuleers, Fonck and Keukeleire to make a theoretical case for a research agenda with more attention to outside-in approaches. We conclude by briefly reflecting on future research agendas in EU foreign policy.
BASE
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Band 54, Heft S1, S. 204-217
ISSN: 0021-9886
In: Cooperation and Conflict, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: European foreign affairs review, Band 20, Heft Special Issue, S. 21-37
ISSN: 1875-8223
The article joins the discussion on the resistance to norms in Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) by focusing on the European External Action Service (EEAS). It begins by defining the norms that are associated with the EEAS as: (1) close cooperation by the Member States with the EEAS, (2) sharing information and (3) abstaining from influencing staff of one's own nationality and Seconded National Experts (SNEs) along one's own national interests. Then, the authors continue by analysing the types of resistance and explaining why the Member States choose to resist the norms related to the organization they had previously created with a unanimous decision. The article concludes that even if soft rules may at first seem to be less costly than hard laws, their less constraining nature does not automatically imply less resistance. All three types of instruments identified by Saurugger and Terpan in the introduction1 have been used for resistance with information and communication being the most commonly employed. Cognitive distance between the European and national level seem to have stronger explanatory value than the financial and social resources of Member States.
In: European integration online papers: EIoP ; an interdisciplinary working papers series, Band 19, Heft 1, S. 1-15
ISSN: 1027-5193
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Band 53, Heft S1, S. 216-229
ISSN: 0021-9886
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Band 53, Heft sup1, S. 216-229
ISSN: 1468-5965
Abstract not available. Adapted from the source document.
In: European Integration online Papers (EIoP), Vol. 19, Article 1 (2015)
SSRN
In: European foreign affairs review, Band 20, S. 21-38
ISSN: 1384-6299
The article joins the discussion on the resistance to norms in Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) by focusing on the European External Action Service (EEAS). It begins by defining the norms that are associated with the EEAS as: (1) close cooperation by the Member States with the EEAS, (2) sharing information and (3) abstaining from influencing staff of one's own nationality and Seconded National Experts (SNEs) along one's own national interests. Then, the authors continue by analysing the types of resistance and explaining why the Member States choose to resist the norms related to the organization they had previously created with a unanimous decision. The article concludes that even if soft rules may at first seem to be less costly than hard laws, their less constraining nature does not automatically imply less resistance. All three types of instruments identified by Saurugger and Terpan in the introduction have been used for resistance with information and communication being the most commonly employed. Cognitive distance between the European and national level seem to have stronger explanatory value than the financial and social resources of Member States. Adapted from the source document.
In: Journal of European public policy, Band 20, Heft 9, S. 1316-1331
ISSN: 1466-4429