Funciones de las Fuerzas Armadas y el Consejo de Seguridad Nacional en Chile de acuerdo a las propuestas de la Reforma Constitucional
In: Ius et praxis: derecho en la región, Band 8, Heft 1
ISSN: 0718-0012
5 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Ius et praxis: derecho en la región, Band 8, Heft 1
ISSN: 0718-0012
In: European journal of international law, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 205-219
ISSN: 1464-3596
In: Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities: JARID, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 309-316
ISSN: 1468-3148
Aim This study investigate what characteristics of supported employment increase quality of life and whether quality of life is higher in supported employment workers or the sheltered ones in Spain. Typicalness, the degree to which the characteristics of a job are the same as those of co‐workers without a disability in the same company, was considered as one of the supported employment characteristics in the analysis.Method Two groups were put together to obtain the data using two questionnaires that were administered by trained professionals. Correlational analysis of the data and manova were also employed.Results No differences were found between the two groups regarding quality of life but results indicate that in supported employment, high levels of typicalness are associated with a higher quality of life and that the handling of certain characteristics of support and the job, for example the hours of direct external support, are related to the enhancement of quality of life of the workers.Conclusions Workers in supported employment show the same quality of life as those in sheltered employment centers. In Spain, the greater the typicalness of the employment, the higher the quality of life. The implications of this for the amount of direct external support for workers with disability is that such support should be used only when absolutely necessary – the minimum support necessary to encourage development.
In: Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities: JARID, Band 0, Heft 0, S. 060119080056003-???
ISSN: 1468-3148
In: Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities: official journal of the International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual Disabilities, Band 15, Heft 3, S. 176-182
ISSN: 1741-1130
AbstractThis article discusses the use of assessed quality of life scores for organization and systems‐level monitoring and reporting, quality improvement, and research. Information presented is based on the experiences of policy makers, service/supports providers, and researchers who have used an eight‐domain quality of life model and the measurement of domain‐referenced indicators. In reference to each use, we provide examples, identify critical issues, and suggest a number of practice guidelines.