62 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 82, Heft 6, S. 1203-1205
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Public works management & policy: a journal for the American Public Works Association, Band 25, Heft 3, S. 333-336
ISSN: 1552-7549
In: Review of policy research, Band 33, Heft 2, S. 226-228
ISSN: 1541-1338
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 75, Heft 4, S. 625-627
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Verkeerskunde, 66 (2), 16-17 (2015)
SSRN
In: Systems research and behavioral science: the official journal of the International Federation for Systems Research, Band 30, Heft 6, S. 794-796
ISSN: 1099-1743
In: KWALON: Tijdschrift voor Kwalitatief Onderzoek, Band 18, Heft 3
ISSN: 1875-7324
Book review
Book review
In this contribution the author reviews Ethics in qualitative
research by T. Miller, M. Birch, M. Mauthner and J. Jessop.
In: Complexity, governance & networks, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 1
ISSN: 2214-3009
(Introduction)
Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)-a configurational research approach-has become often-used in political science. In its original form, QCA is relatively static and does not analyze configurations over time. Since many key questions in political science-and other social sciences-have a temporal dimension, this is a major drawback of QCA. Therefore, we discuss and compare three QCA-related strategies that enable researchers to track configurations over time: (1) Multiple Time Periods, Single QCA; (2) Multiple QCAs, Different Time Periods; and (3) Fuzzy-Set Ideal Type Analysis. We use existing datasets to empirically demonstrate and visualize the strategies. By comparing the strategies, we also contribute to existing overviews on how to address time in QCA. We conclude by formulating an agenda for the further development of the three strategies in applied research, in political science and beyond.
BASE
In: Verweij , S & Vis , B 2021 , ' Three strategies to track configurations over time with Qualitative Comparative Analysis ' , European Political Science Review , vol. 13 , no. 1 , pp. 95-111 . https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773920000375 ; ISSN:1755-7739
Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)-a configurational research approach-has become often-used in political science. In its original form, QCA is relatively static and does not analyze configurations over time. Since many key questions in political science-and other social sciences-have a temporal dimension, this is a major drawback of QCA. Therefore, we discuss and compare three QCA-related strategies that enable researchers to track configurations over time: (1) Multiple Time Periods, Single QCA; (2) Multiple QCAs, Different Time Periods; and (3) Fuzzy-Set Ideal Type Analysis. We use existing datasets to empirically demonstrate and visualize the strategies. By comparing the strategies, we also contribute to existing overviews on how to address time in QCA. We conclude by formulating an agenda for the further development of the three strategies in applied research, in political science and beyond.
BASE
In: European political science review: EPSR, Band 13, Heft 1, S. 95-111
ISSN: 1755-7747
AbstractQualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) – a configurational research approach – has become often-used in political science. In its original form, QCA is relatively static and does not analyze configurations over time. Since many key questions in political science – and other social sciences – have a temporal dimension, this is a major drawback of QCA. Therefore, we discuss and compare three QCA-related strategies that enable researchers to track configurations over time: (1) Multiple Time Periods, Single QCA; (2) Multiple QCAs, Different Time Periods; and (3) Fuzzy-Set Ideal Type Analysis. We use existing datasets to empirically demonstrate and visualize the strategies. By comparing the strategies, we also contribute to existing overviews on how to address time in QCA. We conclude by formulating an agenda for the further development of the three strategies in applied research, in political science and beyond.
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 77, Heft 1, S. 144-146
ISSN: 1540-6210
Related Content: Balfour and Newbold (PAR January/February 2017)Related Content: Roberts (PAR January/February 2017)Related Content: Eckerd (PAR January/February 2017)Related Content: Vidal‐Aparicio (PAR January/February 2017)Related Content: Robbins (PAR January/February 2017)
In: Policy sciences: integrating knowledge and practice to advance human dignity, Band 49, Heft 4, S. 505-523
ISSN: 1573-0891
In: Public administration review: PAR
ISSN: 0033-3352
In: Policy sciences: integrating knowledge and practice to advance human dignity ; the journal of the Society of Policy Scientists, Band 49, Heft 4, S. 505-523
ISSN: 0032-2687