Comparisons of differential survival by country are useful in many domains. In the area of public policy, they help policymakers and analysts assess how much various groups benefit from public programs, such as social security and health care. In financial markets and especially for actuaries, they are important for designing annuities and life insurance products. This paper presents a method for clustering information about differential mortality by country. The approach is then used to group mortality surfaces for European Union (EU) countries. The aim of this paper is to measure between-group inequality in mortality experience in EU countries through a range of mortality indicators. Additionally, the indicators permit the characterization of each group. It is important to take into account characteristics such as sex; therefore, this study differentiates between males and females in order to detect whether their patterns and characterizations are different. It is concluded that there are clear differences in mortality between the east and west of the EU that are more important than the traditional south-north division, with a significant disadvantage for Eastern Europe, and especially for males in Baltic countries. We find that the mortality indicators have evolved in all countries in such a way that the gap between groups has been maintained, both in terms of the differences in mortality levels and variability.
The European Union and the European Space Agency (EU/ESA) have promoted since 1998 (Baveno Manifesto*) the GMES Programme (Global Monitoring for Environment and Security), nowadays called Copernicus (www.copernicus.eu). In the agriculture domain, the use of Copernicus Sentinel imagery and its services are providing several new opportunities. The knowledge of fundamentals of Earth Observation/Geographic Information EO/GI, namely Geomatics, for the development of innovative strategies for professional skills adequacy and capacity building, supporting Copernicus user uptake, becomes mandatory (Gomarasca, 2009). The target is to help bridging gaps between supply and demand of education and training for geospatial sector (www.eo4geo.eu). The innovative and strategical novelties are the complete free access to Sentinel time series imagery and digital image processing software "Sentinel toolboxes" such as SNAP (Sentinel Application Platform) for different environments (Windows, Mac, Unix). The paper introduce topics as crop mapping and monitoring, biophysical parameters, phenology and yield estimations, through several concluded or ongoing international projects such as: ERMES -FP7 (http://www.ermes-fp7space.eu/it/homepage/, Busetto et al. 2017) and SATURNO (https://www.progettosaturno.it/, Nutini et al., 2018) devoted to the regional agricultural monitoring. As conclusion, SNAP software for image processing of Sentinel data was demonstrated and tested together with Earth Engine software for specific vertical agriculture applications. The topics reported in this paper have been part of the Summer School 'Sentinel for Applications in Agriculture' supported by the Copernicus programme, several scientific associations (AIT, ASITA, EARSeL - European Association of Remote Sensing Laboratories), the European Erasmus+ project EO4GEO, University Departments and Geo-Information Companies.
The European Union and the European Space Agency (EU/ESA) have promoted since 1998 (Baveno Manifesto*) the GMES Programme (Global Monitoring for Environment and Security), nowadays called Copernicus (www.copernicus.eu). In the agriculture domain, the use of Copernicus Sentinel imagery and its services are providing several new opportunities. The knowledge of fundamentals of Earth Observation/Geographic Information EO/GI, namely Geomatics, for the development of innovative strategies for professional skills adequacy and capacity building, supporting Copernicus user uptake, becomes mandatory (Gomarasca, 2009). The target is to help bridging gaps between supply and demand of education and training for geospatial sector (www.eo4geo.eu). The innovative and strategical novelties are the complete free access to Sentinel time series imagery and digital image processing software "Sentinel toolboxes" such as SNAP (Sentinel Application Platform) for different environments (Windows, Mac, Unix). The paper introduce topics as crop mapping and monitoring, biophysical parameters, phenology and yield estimations, through several concluded or ongoing international projects such as: ERMES -FP7 (http://www.ermes-fp7space.eu/it/homepage/, Busetto et al. 2017) and SATURNO (https://www.progettosaturno.it/, Nutini et al., 2018) devoted to the regional agricultural monitoring. As conclusion, SNAP software for image processing of Sentinel data was demonstrated and tested together with Earth Engine software for specific vertical agriculture applications. The topics reported in this paper have been part of the Summer School 'Sentinel for Applications in Agriculture' supported by the Copernicus programme, several scientific associations (AIT, ASITA, EARSeL - European Association of Remote Sensing Laboratories), the European Erasmus+ project EO4GEO, University Departments and Geo-Information Companies.
The AQUACROSS project was an unprecedented effort to unify policy concepts, knowledge, and management of freshwater, coastal, and marine ecosystems to support the cost-effective achievement of the targets set by the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. AQUACROSS aimed to support EU efforts to enhance the resilience and stop the loss of biodiversity of aquatic ecosystems as well as to ensure the ongoing and future provision of aquatic ecosystem services. The project focused on advancing the knowledge base and application of Ecosystem-Based Management. Through elaboration of eight diverse case studies in freshwater and marine and estuarine aquatic ecosystem across Europe covering a range of environmental management problems including, eutrophication, sustainable fisheries as well as invasive alien species AQUACROSS demonstrated the application of a common framework to establish cost-effective measures and integrated Ecosystem-Based Management practices. AQUACROSS analysed the EU policy framework (i.e. goals, concepts, time frames) for aquatic ecosystems and built on knowledge stemming from different sources (i.e. WISE, BISE, Member State reporting within different policy processes, modelling) to develop innovative management tools, concepts, and business models (i.e. indicators, maps, ecosystem assessments, participatory approaches, mechanisms for promoting the delivery of ecosystem services) for aquatic ecosystems at various scales of space and time and relevant to different ecosystem types.
In: Assmann , R W , Weikum , M K , Akhter , T , Alesini , D , Alexandrova , A S , Anania , M P , Andreev , N E , Andriyash , I , Artioli , M , Aschikhin , A , Audet , T , Bacci , A , Barna , I F , Bartocci , S , Bayramian , A , Beaton , A , Beck , A , Bellaveglia , M , Beluze , A , Bernhard , A , Biagioni , A , Bielawski , S , Bisesto , F G , Bonatto , A , Boulton , L , Brandi , F , Brinkmann , R , Briquez , F , Brottier , F , Bründermann , E , Büscher , M , Buonomo , B , Bussmann , M H , Bussolino , G , Campana , P , Cantarella , S , Cassou , K , Chancé , A , Chen , M , Chiadroni , E , Cianchi , A , Cioeta , F , Clarke , J A , Cole , J M , Costa , G , Couprie , M E , Cowley , J , Croia , M , Cros , B , Crump , P A , D'Arcy , R , Dattoli , G , Del Dotto , A , Delerue , N , Del Franco , M , Delinikolas , P , De Nicola , S , Dias , J M , Di Giovenale , D , Diomede , M , Di Pasquale , E , Di Pirro , G , Di Raddo , G , Dorda , U , Erlandson , A C , Ertel , K , Esposito , A , Falcoz , F , Falone , A , Fedele , R , Ferran Pousa , A , Ferrario , M , Filippi , F , Fils , J , Fiore , G , Fiorito , R , Fonseca , R A , Franzini , G , Galimberti , M , Gallo , A , Galvin , T C , Ghaith , A , Ghigo , A , Giove , D , Giribono , A , Gizzi , L A , Grüner , F J , Habib , A F , Haefner , C , Heinemann , T , Helm , A , Hidding , B , Holzer , B J , Hooker , S M , Hosokai , T , Hübner , M , Ibison , M , Incremona , S , Irman , A , Iungo , F , Jafarinia , F J , Jakobsson , O , Jaroszynski , D A , Jaster-Merz , S , Joshi , C , Kaluza , M , Kando , M , Karger , O S , Karsch , S , Khazanov , E , Khikhlukha , D , Kirchen , M , Kirwan , G , Kitégi , C , Knetsch , A , Kocon , D , Koester , P , Kononenko , O S , Korn , G , Kostyukov , I , Kruchinin , K O , Labate , L , Le Blanc , C , Lechner , C , Lee , P , Leemans , W , Lehrach , A , Li , X , Li , Y , Libov , V , Lifschitz , A , Lindstrøm , C A , Litvinenko , V , Lu , W , Lundh , O , Maier , A R , Malka , V , Manahan , G G , Mangles , S P D , Marcelli , A , Marchetti , B , Marcouillé , O , Marocchino , A , Marteau , F , Martinez de la Ossa , A , Martins , J L , Mason , P D , Massimo , F , Mathieu , F , Maynard , G , Mazzotta , Z , Mironov , S , Molodozhentsev , A Y , Morante , S , Mosnier , A , Mostacci , A , Müller , A S , Murphy , C D , Najmudin , Z , Nghiem , P A P , Nguyen , F , Niknejadi , P , Nutter , A , Osterhoff , J , Oumbarek Espinos , D , Paillard , J L , Papadopoulos , D N , Patrizi , B , Pattathil , R , Pellegrino , L , Petralia , A , Petrillo , V , Piersanti , L , Pocsai , M A , Poder , K , Pompili , R , Pribyl , L , Pugacheva , D , Reagan , B A , Resta-Lopez , J , Ricci , R , Romeo , S , Rossetti Conti , M , Rossi , A R , Rossmanith , R , Rotundo , U , Roussel , E , Sabbatini , L , Santangelo , P , Sarri , G , Schaper , L , Scherkl , P , Schramm , U , Schroeder , C B , Scifo , J , Serafini , L , Sharma , G , Sheng , Z M , Shpakov , V , Siders , C W , Silva , L O , Silva , T , Simon , C , Simon-Boisson , C , Sinha , U , Sistrunk , E , Specka , A , Spinka , T M , Stecchi , A , Stella , A , Stellato , F , Streeter , M J V , Sutherland , A , Svystun , E N , Symes , D , Szwaj , C , Tauscher , G E , Terzani , D , Toci , G , Tomassini , P , Torres , R , Ullmann , D , Vaccarezza , C , Valléau , M , Vannini , M , Vannozzi , A , Vescovi , S , Vieira , J M , Villa , F , Wahlström , C G , Walczak , R , Walker , P A , Wang , K , Welsch , A , Welsch , C P , Weng , S M , Wiggins , S M , Wolfenden , J , Xia , G , Yabashi , M , Zhang , H , Zhao , Y , Zhu , J & Zigler , A 2020 , ' EuPRAXIA Conceptual Design Report ' , European Physical Journal: Special Topics , vol. 229 , no. 24 , pp. 3675-4284 . https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2020-000127-8
This report presents the conceptual design of a new European research infrastructure EuPRAXIA. The concept has been established over the last four years in a unique collaboration of 41 laboratories within a Horizon 2020 design study funded by the European Union. EuPRAXIA is the first European project that develops a dedicated particle accelerator research infrastructure based on novel plasma acceleration concepts and laser technology. It focuses on the development of electron accelerators and underlying technologies, their user communities, and the exploitation of existing accelerator infrastructures in Europe. EuPRAXIA has involved, amongst others, the international laser community and industry to build links and bridges with accelerator science — through realising synergies, identifying disruptive ideas, innovating, and fostering knowledge exchange. The Eu-PRAXIA project aims at the construction of an innovative electron accelerator using laser- and electron-beam-driven plasma wakefield acceleration that offers a significant reduction in size and possible savings in cost over current state-of-the-art radiofrequency-based accelerators. The foreseen electron energy range of one to five gigaelectronvolts (GeV) and its performance goals will enable versatile applications in various domains, e.g. as a compact free-electron laser (FEL), compact sources for medical imaging and positron generation, table-top test beams for particle detectors, as well as deeply penetrating X-ray and gamma-ray sources for material testing. EuPRAXIA is designed to be the required stepping stone to possible future plasma-based facilities, such as linear colliders at the high-energy physics (HEP) energy frontier. Consistent with a high-confidence approach, the project includes measures to retire risk by establishing scaled technology demonstrators. This report includes preliminary models for project implementation, cost and schedule that would allow operation of the full Eu-PRAXIA facility within 8—10 years.