Suchergebnisse

El trabajo trata sobre uno de los modelos de autonomía encontrados en la historia universitaria latinoamericana del siglo XX, el claustral, configurado a partir del periodo vivido por nuestra Universidad Nacional durante los periodos de "autonomía limitada" (1929-1933) y "absoluta" (1933-1944). Por autonomía claustral se entiende la capacidad universitaria de generar alternativas profesionales, científicas y humanísticas, a través del ejercicio de sus facultades organizacionales e intelectuales, aunque socialmente inviables, dado su carácter "cientificista o culturalista de las mismas", pero sobre todo, por la dialéctica conflictiva con el Estado y la sociedad. El estudio de nuestra universidad, en tales periodos, revela un enclaustramiento academicista y una dinámica conflictiva con el poder público, que le provocó una grave crisis institucional que puso en peligro la viabilidad misma de la casa de estudios.

Analyzes the role of higher educational institutions, as well as challenges they face in the context of globalization. The author refers specially to universities role, arguing that they are making efforts in order to adapt themselves to recent transformations, but are adopting a critical attitude because there are schemes that have been imposed on them. In addition, globalization's paradigm is exposed & the university's structure & goals are underlined. The author emphasizes autonomy, an element through which the university can face globalization, & offers alternatives for today's problems. The article concludes dealing with the social sciences, highlighting international relations, for which the author proposes the study of history in professional training. Adapted from the source document.

Explores the influence of a specific model of autonomy in the history of the UNM (National U of Mexico), 1929-1944, focusing on relationships of state & academic institutions. As a description of the capacity of the university to produce professional, scientific, & humanist innovations by mobilizing its organizational & intellectual faculty, cloistered autonomy was not socially feasible due to its scientific-rationalist & culturalist tendencies. While UNM witnessed a period of "limited autonomy" (1929-1933), & "absolute autonomy" (1933-1944), cloistered autonomy failed because of its conflictual interaction with the state. The persistence of an ideology of "cloistered academicism" during this period at odds with public power resulted in an institutional crisis for the university & threatened its existence. 45 References. Adapted from the source document.

Reseña del libro de Sartori, Giovanni, Teoría de la democracia, México, Alianza editorial, 1987, 2 vols.