Order and Justice in Iraq
In: Survival: global politics and strategy, Band 45, Heft 4, S. 135-152
ISSN: 1468-2699
10 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Survival: global politics and strategy, Band 45, Heft 4, S. 135-152
ISSN: 1468-2699
In: Survival: global politics and strategy, Band 45, Heft 4, S. 135-152
ISSN: 0039-6338
In: Political science quarterly: a nonpartisan journal devoted to the study and analysis of government, politics and international affairs ; PSQ, Band 115, Heft 2, S. 303-305
ISSN: 1538-165X
In: Annual review of political science, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 345-362
ISSN: 1545-1577
▪ Abstract In this essay, we survey the literature on international criminal tribunals and transitional justice. We argue that the literature has been dominated by two general orientations, a legalism that is premised on a logic of appropriateness and a pragmatism premised on a logic of consequences. We also consider a third orientation, guided by a logic of emotions, that recognizes the significance of transitional justice but emphasizes strategies that diverge from the model of legalism. Our primary concern is with scholarship in political science, although we also consider work from the disciplines of law, history, and sociology and from practitioners and advocates. The normative positions of scholars have heavily influenced the development of literature in this field, in which scholarship, practice, and advocacy are deeply intertwined. Advocates and individuals who have played key roles in the development of international criminal justice institutions, domestic tribunals, and truth commissions have been prominent in setting the agenda for scholars. Nonetheless, there is also a growing body of rigorous social science research that attempts to assess empirically—and sometimes critically—the claims of advocates and practitioners and to explain changing strategies of justice.
In: International security, Band 28, Heft 3, S. 5-44
ISSN: 1531-4804
In: Annual review of political science, Band 7, S. 345-362
ISSN: 1545-1577
In this essay, we survey the literature on international criminal tribunals & transitional justice. We argue that the literature has been dominated by two general orientations, a legalism that is premised on logic of appropriateness & a pragmatism premised on a logic of consequences. We also consider a third orientation, guided by a logic of emotions, that recognizes the significance of transitional justice but emphasizes strategies that diverge from the model of legalism. Our primary concern is with scholarship in political science, although we also consider work from the disciplines of law, history, & sociology & from practitioners & advocates. The normative positions of scholars have heavily influenced the development of literature in this field, in which scholarship, practice, & advocacy are deeply intertwined. Advocates & individuals who have played key roles in the development of international criminal justice institutions, domestic tribunals, & truth commissions have been prominent in setting the agenda for scholars. Nonetheless, there is also a growing body of rigorous social science research that attempts to assess empirically -- & sometimes critically -- the claims of advocates & practitioners & to explain changing strategies of justice. 60 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: Annual review of political science, Band 7, S. 345-362
ISSN: 1094-2939
In: Conflict, security & development: CSD, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 103-113
ISSN: 1478-1174
In: Political science quarterly: PSQ ; the journal public and international affairs, Band 115, Heft 2, S. 303-304
ISSN: 0032-3195
In: International security, Band 28, Heft 3, S. 5-44
ISSN: 0162-2889
World Affairs Online