Suchergebnisse

This text is the result of bibliographical research, of a philosophical nature, supported by the records of the philosophy of difference and/or multiplicity developed by French philosophers Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari. Our intention is to situate how philosophy, as well as art and science, are defined by the creative power, or by the demand to create a new thought, as opposed to representational thinking and recognition. We will highlight the specificity of philosophical activity and its primary task as the creation of concepts and we will point out elements of a pedagogy of the concept. Through it and territorialization and deterritorialization movements, we carried out a thought exercise addressing issues related to the contemporary university, opposing two images of knowledge, namely, the arboreal and the rhizomatic; we also propose the concept of a smaller university as a bulwark of resistance.

This article, of a philosophical nature, has as its object of study a critique of the representative and dogmatic model of thought made by the philosopher Gilles Deleuze. A bibliographic research has as theoretical horizon the philosophy of difference, focusing on the Deleuzian legacy. The author presents assumptions that created representative thinking in the form of postulates. There are eight postulates: Cogitatio Universalis (thinking naturally, the ideal of common sense, the model of recognition, the element of representation, the negative of error, the privilege of design, one of the solutions and the result saber. It is worth pointing out the contours of these postulates that show a dogmatic image of thought - a traitorous image of what it means to think. This model image has strong resonances in the contemporary educational universe. It is therefore a matter of effecting, in tune with Deleuze, a critique of the dogmatic images of thought and its boundaries that often deemphasize thought, the thought of education, and, by extension, life itself.