Suchergebnisse

This is the final version of the article. Available from Wiley via the DOI in this record. ; Quantifying the relationship between tree diameter and height is a key component of efforts to estimate biomass and carbon stocks in tropical forests. Although substantial site-to-site variation in height-diameter allometries has been documented, the time consuming nature of measuring all tree heights in an inventory plot means that most studies do not include height, or else use generic pan-tropical or regional allometric equations to estimate height. Using a pan-tropical dataset of 73 plots where at least 150 trees had in-field ground-based height measurements, we examined how the number of trees sampled affects the performance of locally derived height-diameter allometries, and evaluated the performance of different methods for sampling trees for height measurement. Using cross-validation, we found that allometries constructed with just 20 locally measured values could often predict tree height with lower error than regional or climate-based allometries (mean reduction in prediction error = 0.46 m). The predictive performance of locally derived allometries improved with sample size, but with diminishing returns in performance gains when more than 40 trees were sampled. Estimates of stand-level biomass produced using local allometries to estimate tree height show no over- or under-estimation bias when compared with biomass estimates using field measured heights. We evaluated five strategies to sample trees for height measurement, and found that sampling strategies that included measuring the heights of the ten largest diameter trees in a plot outperformed (in terms of resulting in local height-diameter models with low height prediction error) entirely random or diameter size-class stratified approaches. Our results indicate that even limited sampling of heights can be used to refine height-diameter allometries. We recommend aiming for a conservative threshold of sampling 50 trees per location for height measurement, and including the ten trees with the largest diameter in this sample. ; This paper is a product of the RAINFOR, AfriTRON and T-FORCES networks, for which we are indebted to the hundreds of institutions, field assistants and local communities across many countries that have supported and hosted fieldwork. The three networks have been supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Urgency Grants and NERC Consortium Grants "AMAZONICA" (NE/F005806/1), "TROBIT" (NE/D005590/1) and "BIO-RED" (NE/N012542/1), a NERC New Investigators Grant, a European Research Council grant ("Tropical Forests in the Changing Earth System"), the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (283080, "GEOCARBON"; 282664, "AMAZALERT"), the Royal Society and Gabon's National Parks Agency (ANPN). R.J.W.B. is funded by a NERC research fellowship (grant ref: NE/I021160/1). S.L.L. was supported by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship, ERC Advanced Grant and a Phillip Leverhulme Prize. O.L.P. is supported by an ERC Advanced Grant and a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award. L.F.B. was supported by a NERC studentship, RGS-IBG Henrietta Hutton Grant and Royal Society Dudley Stamp Award. R.H. and M.C. were supported through the long-term research development project no. RVO 67985939 and a KBFSC research fellowship (2011, to R.H.). M. Svátek was funded by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (grant number INGO II LG15051). We thank Georgia Pickavance for assistance with database curation, and Natacha Nssi Bengone, Sylvester Chenikan, Eric Chezeaux, Armandu Daniels, Jean-Louis Doucet, Kath Jeffery, Edi Mirmanto, Abel Monteagudo-Mendoza, Faustin Mpanya Lukasu, Reuben Nilus, Guido Pardo, Lourens Poorter, Sylvester Tan, Marisol Toledo, Armando Torres-Lezama, John Tshibamba Mukendi, Richard Tshombe, Geertje van der Heijden, Lee White, Hannsjoerg Woell and John Woods, Gabon's National Parks Agency (ANPN), the Forest Development Authority of Liberia and Wildlife Conservation Society-Democratic Republic of Congo for assistance with access to datasets. We thank an anonymous reviewer for constructive comments on this manuscript.

This is the final version. Available from the National Academy of Sciences via the DOI in this record. ; The input data and R code are available on ForestPlots (https://doi.org/10.5521/forestplots.net/2021_4). ; The responses of tropical forests to environmental change are critical uncertainties in predicting the future impacts of climate change. The positive phase of the 2015-2016 El Niño Southern Oscillation resulted in unprecedented heat and low precipitation in the tropics with substantial impacts on the global carbon cycle. The role of African tropical forests is uncertain as their responses to short-term drought and temperature anomalies have yet to be determined using on-the-ground measurements. African tropical forests may be particularly sensitive because they exist in relatively dry conditions compared with Amazonian or Asian forests, or they may be more resistant because of an abundance of drought-adapted species. Here, we report responses of structurally intact old-growth lowland tropical forests inventoried within the African Tropical Rainforest Observatory Network (AfriTRON). We use 100 long-term inventory plots from six countries each measured at least twice prior to and once following the 2015-2016 El Niño event. These plots experienced the highest temperatures and driest conditions on record. The record temperature did not significantly reduce carbon gains from tree growth or significantly increase carbon losses from tree mortality, but the record drought did significantly decrease net carbon uptake. Overall, the long-term biomass increase of these forests was reduced due to the El Niño event, but these plots remained a live biomass carbon sink (0.51 ± 0.40 Mg C ha-1 y-1) despite extreme environmental conditions. Our analyses, while limited to African tropical forests, suggest they may be more resistant to climatic extremes than Amazonian and Asian forests. ; Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) ; Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) ; European Research Council (ERC) ; The Royal Society ; Belgian Science Policy Office (BELSPO) ; Belgian Science Policy Office (BELSPO) ; Belgian Science Policy Office (BELSPO) ; Belgian Science Policy Office (BELSPO) ; Flemish Interuniversity Council VLIR-UOS ; Flemish Interuniversity Council VLIR-UOS ; Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) ; The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation ; European Union ; Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) ; Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) ; Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) ; Gabon's National Parks Agency ; Leverhulme Trust ; The David and Lucile Packard Foundation ; CIFOR