Suchergebnisse

The purpose of this work is to study the process of managing historical memory in a multiethnic society, associated with the construction of images of the past for the formation of national identity. In the course of the study, it was found that historical memory carries not only cultural meanings that make it possible to realize the continuity of the past, present and future, but also political significance, which gives grounds to consider it as an instrument of political control. Management of historical memory allows you to control public consciousness. It was revealed that for the consolidation of the multiethnic Russian society, it is necessary to manage the "images of the past", since the past is the social structure that is formed by the current needs of society. The management of historical memory is carried out through the historical policy of the state. The results obtained in the course of the study can be applied in the activities of federal and regional authorities responsible for the development and implementation of the historical policy of the state, as well as for the content of educational and informational content dedicated to the history of the Russian state.

PurposeThe purpose of the paper is to develop a concept of organization of the system of science and education in the form 4.0 based on human and artificial intellectual capital.Design/methodology/approachThe methods of regression and correlation analysis are used. The role of human and artificial intellectual capital for provision of effectiveness and competitiveness of the system of science and education is determined, as well as its correspondence to the modern challenges. Analysis of perspectives and limitations of automatization of the system of science and education based on AI is conducted; a model of organization of the system of science and education in the form 4.0 based on human and artificial intellectual capital is compiled.FindingsIt is established that in the system of science and education, the decisive production factor is intellectual capital, but human intellect does not necessarily have to dominate in its structure. AI is one of the most popular technologies of Industry 4.0 in the system of science and education, which has wide perspectives of practical implementation. As experience of the leading world universities, which had the highest level of digitization in 2018, showed, foundation on non-breakthrough digital technologies (computer equipment and Internet) does not allow opening the potential of increase of indicators of effectiveness and competitiveness of the system of science and education and bringing it in correspondence to the modern challenges based on digitization. However, correlation of activity of application of artificial intellectual capital with these indicators is four times higher (0.2), as compared to correlation of these indicators with activity of application of human intellectual capital (0.05). This shows demand for digitization of the system of science and education, but based on breakthrough digital technologies, of which AI should become the key one.Originality/valueIt is substantiated that higher education could be automatized based on AI by 85% and science by 63%. Therefore, on the whole in the system of science and education, the share of AI in the structure of intellectual capital could reach 74% ((85 + 63)/2). It is recommended to use the developed model of organization of the system of science and education in the form 4.0 based on human and artificial intellectual capital.

Business and entrepreneurship occupy an important place in the Russian economy, in fact, determining the prospects for the development of the economic sector, as well as in the social sphere, influencing the promotion of society in the field of innovation. However, at present, the development of business and entrepreneurship in Russia faces a number of barriers of an objective and subjective nature, related to the existing economic relations in society, institutional conditions and the specifics of the business community itself, with its own culture, value bases of activity, and level of professional responsibility. In these circumstances, there is a need for a deep sociological reflection of the features of business and entrepreneurship functioning in the conditions of Russian realities, the factors that determine its problems and prospects for development, as well as the theoretical grounds for studying these social phenomena. An analysis of sociological work in this direction allows us to reveal the specifics of the discursive space in the field of studying business and entrepreneurship in Russia, as well as outlines the prospects for further theoretical and empirical development of this problem.

Intro -- Introduction -- Contents -- Part I: The Problems and Perspectives of Development of the System of Public Administration in the Modern Russian Conditions -- Chapter 1: Developmental Trends in the Institutional Environment of Russian Civil Society Within the Context of Government Reg... -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Materials and Methods -- 3 Results -- 4 Discussion -- 5 Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 2: Imperatives of Diversification and Modernization of Public Policy in Modern Russia -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Materials and Methods -- 3 Results -- 4 nclusion -- References -- Chapter 3: Global and Local Challenges and Threats to the Russian National System of Public Administration in Terms of the Glo... -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Materials and Methods -- 3 Results -- 4 Discussion -- 5 Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 4: The Strategy of Overcoming Path Dependence in the Context of Modernization of the Russian System of State Management -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Materials and Methods -- 3 Results -- 4 Discussion -- 5 Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 5: Practices to Harmonize Cooperation Between Prevalent and Complementary Institutions of the Russian Society: Toward ... -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Materials and Methods -- 3 Results -- 4 Discussions -- 5 Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 6: The Main Parameters of Functioning of Nationally Oriented Capital in the Russian System of State Management -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Materials and Methods -- 3 Results -- 4 Discussion -- 5 Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 7: Economic Federalism: Interaction of Federal Authorities and Regions -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Materials and Methods -- 3 Results -- 4 Discussion -- 5 nclusion -- References -- Chapter 8: City Management in the US and Western Europe: Historical Background and Implementation Experience -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Materials and Methods -- 3 Result.

PurposeThe goal of the research is to analyze the university development trends in the national innovation system. The paper presents a review of the formation of innovative development strategies and the place of a university in them. The structure is based on the analysis of foreign trends of the transformation of universities and the examination of the efficiency of the interaction between the university, industry and the state. Russian experience in the transformation of universities is presented.Design/methodology/approachResearch methodologies include methods of statistical and comparative analysis and synthesis. The information analysis base of the research is composed of the reports of the World Intellectual Property Organization at year-end 2019, as well as global comparative assessments of the status and development of innovation activities by the Global Innovation Index and Global Competitiveness Index, which are calculated according to the methodology of the World Economic Forum and others.FindingsIn the course of research, the authors put forward a new model of universities within the framework of the national innovation system, which is based on the "triple helix model of innovation" implemented by universities, industry and the state. The logic and structure of the research are set forth in the following way. First, a review of the global practice of the formation and implementation of state innovation policy is given, with the university being a key link, the foreign experience in the transformation of universities is analyzed and the efficiency of the interaction between the university, industry and the state is examined. Furthermore, consideration is given to the Russian experience in the transformation of universities. In conclusion, the main findings of the research are presented.Practical implicationsResults testify that goals and objectives that can be solved by achieving indicators in the world rankings are important for improving competitiveness of education, but they are only efficient if they conform to management decisions that are taken for achieving them and coincide with strategic goals and directions that should be implemented within the framework of the national innovation and academic system.Originality/valueResearch hypothesis is as follows: modern age is characterized by the rapid development of digital technologies and globalization processes, which transform technologies and cultural patterns into techniques and methods of working with information. Despite the fact that a university is the center for the development of society and culture, which serves as an axiological core, it is subject to the transformation, which is mainly manifested in instrumental changes and the expansion of the social procurement range. The modern educational system is yet to find a contemporary conceptual framework of a university that would satisfy the up-to-date requirements of the global information society in an age of digital revolution and dominate in the educational services market.