Suchergebnisse

30 pags., 13 figs., 4 tabs. ; We present the inter-comparison of delta slant column densities (SCDs) and vertical profiles of nitrous acid (HONO) derived from measurements of different multiaxis differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAXDOAS) instruments and using different inversion algorithms during the Second Cabauw Inter-comparison campaign for Nitrogen Dioxide measuring Instruments (CINDI- 2) in September 2016 at Cabauw, the Netherlands (51.97° N, 4.93° E). The HONO vertical profiles, vertical column densities (VCDs), and near-surface volume mixing ratios are compared between different MAX-DOAS instruments and profile inversion algorithms for the first time. Systematic and random discrepancies of the HONO results are derived from the comparisons of all data sets against their median values. Systematic discrepancies of HONO delta SCDs are observed in the range of ±0:3×1015 molec. cm2, which is half of the typical random discrepancy of 0:6× 1015 molec. cm2. For a typical high HONO delta SCD of 2×1015 molec. cm2, the relative systematic and random discrepancies are about 15% and 30 %, respectively. The inter-comparison of HONO profiles shows that both systematic and random discrepancies of HONO VCDs and nearsurface volume mixing ratios (VMRs) are mostly in the range of ∼ ±0:5×1014 molec. cm2 and ∼ ±0:1 ppb (typically ∼ 20 %). Further we find that the discrepancies of the retrieved HONO profiles are dominated by discrepancies of the HONO delta SCDs. The profile retrievals only contribute to the discrepancies of the HONO profiles by ∼ 5 %. However, some data sets with substantially larger discrepancies than the typical values indicate that inappropriate implementations of profile inversion algorithms and configurations of radiative transfer models in the profile retrievals can also be an important uncertainty source. In addition, estimations of measurement uncertainties of HONO dSCDs, which can significantly impact profile retrievals using the optimal estimation method, need to consider not only DOAS fit errors, but also atmospheric variability, especially for an instrument with a DOAS fit error lower than ∼ 3×1014 molec. cm2. The MAX-DOAS results during the CINDI-2 campaign indicate that the peak HONO levels (e.g. near-surface VMRs of ∼ 0:4 ppb) often appeared in the early morning and below 0.2 km. The near-surface VMRs retrieved from the MAXDOAS observations are compared with those measured using a co-located long-path DOAS instrument. The systematic differences are smaller than 0.15 and 0.07 ppb during early morning and around noon, respectively. Since true HONO values at high altitudes are not known in the absence of real measurements, in order to evaluate the abilities of profile inversion algorithms to respond to different HONO profile shapes, we performed sensitivity studies using synthetic HONO delta SCDs simulated by a radiative transfer model with assumed HONO profiles. The tests indicate that the profile inversion algorithms based on the optimal estimation method with proper configurations can reproduce the different HONO profile shapes well. Therefore we conclude that the features of HONO accumulated near the surface derived from MAX-DOAS measurements. ; Funding for this study was provided by ESA through the CINDI-2 (ESA contract no. 4000118533/16/I-Sbo) and FRM4DOAS (ESA contract no. 4000118181/16/I-EF) projects, by the NSFC (grant no. 41805027), the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant no. 18-35-00682), the Russian Academy of Sciences (grant nos. 0150-2018-0052 and 0129-2019- 0002), NASA's Atmospheric Composition Program (grant no. NASA-16-NUP2016-0001), the US National Science Foundation (AGS-1620530 award), and the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme through the ACTRIS-2 transnational access programme (grant no. 654109). The AIOFM group is grateful for the support by the NSFC (grant no. 41530644). The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the Max Planck Society

30 pags., 11 figs., 5 tabs. ; We quantify the stratospheric injection of brominated very short-lived substances (VSLS) based on aircraft observations acquired in winter 2014 above the Tropical Western Pacific during the CONvective TRansport of Active Species in the Tropics (CONTRAST) and the Airborne Tropical TRopopause EXperiment (ATTREX) campaigns. The overall contribution of VSLS to stratospheric bromine was determined to be 5.0 ± 2.1 ppt, in agreement with the 5 ± 3 ppt estimate provided in the 2014 World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Ozone Assessment report (WMO 2014), but with lower uncertainty. Measurements of organic bromine compounds, including VSLS, were analyzed using CFC-11 as a reference stratospheric tracer. From this analysis, 2.9 ± 0.6 ppt of bromine enters the stratosphere via organic source gas injection of VSLS. This value is two times the mean bromine content of VSLS measured at the tropical tropopause, for regions outside of the Tropical Western Pacific, summarized in WMO 2014. A photochemical box model, constrained to CONTRAST observations, was used to estimate inorganic bromine from measurements of BrO collected by two instruments. The analysis indicates that 2.1 ± 2.1 ppt of bromine enters the stratosphere via inorganic product gas injection. We also examine the representation of brominated VSLS within 14 global models that participated in the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative. The representation of stratospheric bromine in these models generally lies within the range of our empirical estimate. Models that include explicit representations of VSLS compare better with bromine observations in the lower stratosphere than models that utilize longer-lived chemicals as a surrogate for VSLS. ; The CONTRAST field deployment was supported by the U.S. NSF, and the ATTREX field deployment was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). P. A. W., R. J. S., T. P. C., J. M. N., and D. C. A. received support from NSF, NASA Atmospheric Composition Modeling and Analysis Program (ACMAP), and the NASA Modeling, Analysis, and Prediction (MAP). D. C. A. also received support from the NASA Upper Atmospheric Research Program. J. M. N. was also supported by the NASA Postdoctoral Program at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, administered by Universities Space Research Association under contract with NASA. R. V. acknowledges funding from NSF awards AGS‐1261740 and AGS‐1620530. CONTRAST data are publicly available at "http://data.eol.ucar.edu/master_list/?project= CONTRAST." ATTREX data are publicly available at "https://espoarchive.nasa.gov/archive/browse/attrex/id4/GHawk." The National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) meteorological data are available at "https://doi.org/10.5065/D6M043C6." CCMI outputs from CESM1‐WACCM and CESM1‐CAM4Chem are archived by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) at "www.earthsystemgrid.org," and NCAR is sponsored by NSF. CCMI output from the EMAC‐L90MA‐SD simulation is available at "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1204495." All other CCMI simulations are archived by the British Atmospheric Data Centre at "http://badc.nerc.ac.uk/". Output from CAM‐chem‐SD is available as "NCAR/ACD CAMChem 1 Degree Forecast" at "http://catalog.eol.ucar.edu/contrast/model/CAMChem_NCAR_1deg/." WACCM and CAM‐Chem are components of the Community Earth System Model (CESM), which is also supported by NSF. Computing resources were provided by NCAR's Climate Simulation Laboratory, sponsored by NSF and other agencies. This research was enabled by the computational and storage resources of NCAR's Computational and Information System Laboratory (CISL). R. S. and K. A. S., with ACCESS‐CCM, acknowledge support from Australian Research Council's Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (CE110001028), the Australian Government's National Computational Merit Allocation Scheme (q90), and Australian Antarctic science grant program (FoRCES 4012). CCSRNIES research was supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (2‐1303 and 2‐1709) of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan, and computations were performed on NEC‐SX9/A(ECO) computers at the CGER, NIES. The EMAC simulations have been performed at the German Climate Computing Centre (DKRZ) through support from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). DKRZ and its scientific steering committee are gratefully acknowledged for providing the HPC and data archiving resources for the consortial project ESCiMo (Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling). The TOMCAT modeling was supported by NERC NCAS and the SISLAC project (NE/R001782/1), and the simulations were performed on the Archer and Leeds HPC Systems.