Suchergebnisse

The purpose of the present study was to examine the moderation of parental mediation in the longitudinal association between being a bystander of cyberbullying and cyberbullying perpetration and cyberbullying victimization. Participants were 1067 7th and 8th graders between 12 and 15 years old (51% female) from six middle schools in predominantly middle-class neighborhoods in the Midwestern United States. Increases in being bystanders of cyberbullying was related positively to restrictive and instructive parental mediation. Restrictive parental mediation was related positively to Time 2 (T2) cyberbullying victimization, while instructive parental mediation was negatively related to T2 cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Restrictive parental mediation was a moderator in the association between bystanders of cyberbullying and T2 cyberbullying victimization. Increases in restrictive parental mediation strengthened the positive relationship between these variables. In addition, instructive mediation moderated the association between bystanders of cyberbullying and T2 cyberbullying victimization such that increases in this form of parental mediation strategy weakened the association between bystanders of cyberbullying and T2 cyberbullying victimization. The current findings indicate a need for parents to be aware of how they can impact adolescents' involvement in cyberbullying as bullies and victims. In addition, greater attention should be given to developing parental intervention programs that focus on the role of parents in helping to mitigate adolescents' likelihood of cyberbullying involvement.

The purpose of the present study was to examine the moderation of parental mediation in the longitudinal association between being a bystander of cyberbullying and cyberbullying perpetration and cyberbullying victimization. Participants were 1067 7th and 8th graders between 12 and 15 years old (51% female) from six middle schools in predominantly middle-class neighborhoods in the Midwestern United States. Increases in being bystanders of cyberbullying was related positively to restrictive and instructive parental mediation. Restrictive parental mediation was related positively to Time 2 (T2) cyberbullying victimization, while instructive parental mediation was negatively related to T2 cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Restrictive parental mediation was a moderator in the association between bystanders of cyberbullying and T2 cyberbullying victimization. Increases in restrictive parental mediation strengthened the positive relationship between these variables. In addition, instructive mediation moderated the association between bystanders of cyberbullying and T2 cyberbullying victimization such that increases in this form of parental mediation strategy weakened the association between bystanders of cyberbullying and T2 cyberbullying victimization. The current findings indicate a need for parents to be aware of how they can impact adolescents' involvement in cyberbullying as bullies and victims. In addition, greater attention should be given to developing parental intervention programs that focus on the role of parents in helping to mitigate adolescents' likelihood of cyberbullying involvement.

This study (1) reports frequency rates of mutually exclusive traditional, cyber and combined (both traditional and cyber) bullying roles; and (2) investigates whether adolescents belonging to particular bullying roles show higher levels of involvement in risky online activities (Compulsive Internet Use (CIU), online grooming victimization, and sexting) and risky offline activities (bad behavior in school, drinking alcohol and truancy) than non-involved adolescents. The sample comprised self-reports of 1928 German, Dutch and Thai adolescents (Age = 12–18; M = 14.52; SD = 1.6). The results revealed age, sex and country differences in bullying frequency rates. CIU, sending of sexts and risky offline activities were most strongly associated with combined bully-victims. The receiving of sexts was most strongly associated with combined bullies; and online grooming victimization was most strongly related to cyber bully-victims. Another important finding is that the associations between risky offline activities and combined bullying are stronger than for traditional and cyber bullying. The findings contribute to better understanding of the associations between varying bullying roles and risky online and offline activities among adolescents. In sum, the results underscore the need to promote life skills rather than adopting more conventional approaches, which focus almost exclusively on reduction of risks.

Wenn Hass redet und schädigt. Einleitung in den Sammelband -- Hass mit Likes: Hate Speech als Kommunikationsform in den Social Media -- Sexistische Online-Hassrede auf Videoplattformen -- Hass und seine vielen Gesichter: Eine sozial- und kommunikationswissenschaftliche Einordnung von Hate Speech -- Die ách so friedlichen Muslime": Eine korpusbasierte Untersuchung von Formulierungsmustern fremdenfeindlicher Aussagen in Sozialen Medien -- What if Hate Speech Really Was Speech? Towards Explaining Hate Speech in a Cross-Modal -- Lexikalische Mittel für Hate Speech und ihre semantische Analyse -- Zwischen Vernichtungseifer und Ethnopluralismus: Affektive Dynamiken von Hassrede in der Literatur zwischen Kleist und Breivik -- Hate Speech thematisieren: (K)eine Aufgabe für eine liberale öffentliche Allgemeinbildung?! Reflexionen zu zwölf Unterrichtsbeispielen aus Japan und Deutschland -- Hate Speech. Aggressionstheoretische und sozialpsychologische Erklärungsansätze -- Hate Speech gegen Medienschaffende – Eine empirische Analyse der Hintergründe und Wirkungen von Angriffen gegen Journalist*innen -- Hate Speech als Herausforderung für Schule und Lehrkräftebildung -- Hate Speech im analogen Raum der Schule – Zu Phänomen und Erforschung einer pädagogischen Herausforderung -- Addressing Hate Speech with Data Science: An Overview from Computer Science Perspective -- Was wirkt gegen Hate Speech? – Erfahrungen aus über 10 Jahren zivilgesellschaftlicher Arbeit der Amadeu -- Hate Speech und antisemitische Vorfälle: Rückfragen aus einer zivilgesellschaftlichen Perspektive am Beispiel RIAS -- Hass ist keine Meinung – No Hate Speech Movement -- Die Facebook-Gruppe #ichbinhier.

Deckblatt -- Titelseite -- Impressum -- Inhalt -- 1 Einleitung -- 2 Wie kann man Mobbing erkennen? -- 2.1 Begriffsbestimmung -- 2.2 Erscheinungs- und Interaktionsformen des Mobbings -- 2.3 Was Mobbing nicht ist -- 2.4 Verbreitung von Mobbing -- 2.5 Erklärungsansätze von Mobbing -- 2.6 Folgen von Mobbing -- Exkurs I: Cyber-Mobbing -- Exkurs II: Lehrer als Opfer oder Täter von Mobbing -- 3 Wie kann man gegen Mobbing handeln? -- 3.1 Grundhaltung beim Umgang mit Mobbing: Genau hinschauen und schnell handeln -- 3.2 Eine Interventionsstrategie gegen Mobbing in zehn Schritten -- 3.3 Welches Interventionsprogramm gegen Mobbing passt zu meiner Schule? -- 3.4 Konzeptioneller Vergleich der Interventionsprogramme -- 3.5 Schulrechtliche Aspekte -- 4 Wie kann man Mobbing vorbeugen? -- 4.1 Präventionsmodell und Wirkfaktoren -- 4.2 Situationsanalyse, Mobbing-Prävention an deutschen Schulen -- 4.3 Methoden und Best-Practice-Hinweise für die Prävention von Mobbing -- 4.4 Sicherung der Nachhaltigkeit -- 4.5 Was sollte man nicht tun? Wirkungslose Maßnahmen -- 4.6 Ausgewählte, evaluierte Präventionsprogramme -- Literatur.

Despite public discourses highlighting the negative consequences of time spent online (TSO) for children's well-being, Norwegian children (aged 9–16 years) use the Internet more than other European children and score higher on self-reported life satisfaction (SRLS). To explore the possibility that TSO might contribute to high life satisfaction or other underlying explanatory factors, we investigate the relationship between TSO and SRLS in Norway while also accounting for how individual, family, school, and broader social circumstances influence this relationship. Countering prevailing discourses, we find a positive relationship between TSO and SRLS, which remains positive and significant even after a wider range of variables are accounted for. By explaining the circumstances under which TSO has a positive effect on SRLS, this article provides evidence of the complex role that digital technology plays in the lives of children. It also provides a critique of the often simplistic arguments found in public discourses around children's digital media use.

AbstractPrior research into bystander responses to hate speech has utilized variable-centered analyses — such approaches risk simplifying the complex nature of bystander behaviors. Hence, the present study used a person-centered analysis to investigate latent hate speech bystander profiles. In addition, individual and classroom-level correlates associated with the various profiles were studied. The sample included 3225 students in grades 7–9 (51.7% self-identified as female; 37.2% with immigrant background) from 215 classrooms in Germany and Switzerland. The latent profile analysis revealed that four distinct profiles could be distinguished: Passive Bystanders (34.2%), Defenders (47.3%), Revengers (9.8%), and Contributors (8.6%). Multilevel logistic regression models showed common and distinct correlates. For example, students who believed that certain social groups are superior were more likely to be Revengers and Contributors than Passive Bystanders, students who felt more connected with teachers were more likely to be Defenders, and students who were more open to diversity were less likely to be Contributors than Passive Bystanders. Students were less likely Defenders and more likely Revengers and Contributors than Passive Bystanders in classrooms with high rates of hate speech perpetration. Further, in classrooms with high hate speech intervention, students were more likely to be Defenders and less likely to be Contributors than Passive Bystanders. In classrooms with stronger cohesion, students were more likely to be Defenders and less likely to be Contributors than Passive Bystanders. In conclusion, the findings add to our understanding of bystander profiles concerning racist hate speech and the relevance of individual and classroom-level factors in explaining various profiles of bystander behavior.

Das Thema Hatespeech rückt immer mehr in den Fokus der Öffentlichkeit und der Forschung. Im Gegensatz zu Hatespeech im Internet wird jedoch Hatespeech unter Jugendlichen, die von Angesicht zu Angesicht im Schulkontext ausgeübt wird, kaum beachtet. Hier setzt die vorliegende Studie an, in der Schüler*innen (n = 55), Lehrkräfte (n = 18) und Sozialpädagog*innen (n =16) auf der Basis leitfadengestützter Interviews dazu befragt wurden, was mögliche Beweggründe und Motive dafür sind, dass Schüler*innen Hatespeech in der Lebenswelt Schule und online ausüben. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass mögliche Beweggründe für Hatespeech Angst vor Statusverlust, Gruppendruck, Provokation, Spaß, politisch-ideologische Überzeugung und Kompensation von Frust- und Minderwertigkeitsgefühlen sind. Darüber hinaus wird verdeutlicht, dass sich hinter diesen Gründen für Hatespeech oftmals Grundmotive nach Macht und Zugehörigkeit abzeichnen. Die Ergebnisse werden in Bezug auf anschließende Forschung und praktische Implikationen diskutiert.