Marriage, property, and law in late Imperial Russia
In: Oxford historical monographs
30 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Oxford historical monographs
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 80, Heft 3, S. 688-689
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 78, Heft 2, S. 577-578
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 74, Heft 1, S. 188-189
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 66, Heft 1, S. 147-148
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Child abuse & neglect: the international journal ; official journal of the International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect, Band 28, Heft 4, S. 478-480
ISSN: 1873-7757
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 63, Heft 4, S. 888-889
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 60, Heft 3, S. 558-565
ISSN: 2325-7784
A forum on Boris Mironov's Russian and English editions of The Social History of Imperial Russia, 1700-1917 (2000) offers the comments of four scholars on different aspects of Mironov's work. David L. Ransel introduces the forum with a consideration of whether Russian and western historical scholarship has been or should be converging, and he reviews the Russian-language response to Mironov's book. William G. Wagner discusses Mironov's key conclusions: that the imperial period was marked by the development of a more individualistic personality, the democratic nuclear family, civil society, and a state order based on the rule of law. He questions, however, the validity of the modernization paradigm as an adequate tool for analyzing these developments. Willard Sunderland comments on the use of the concept of empire in Mironov's book, calling attention to the assertion that imperial Russia was a "normal" European state and that it was not a "true colonial state." The focus of the book, he argues, remains Russian society within the space of the empire, not the society of the empire as a whole. Steven L. Hoch considers Mironov's chapter on demographic processes, criticizing the use of demographic theory and its application to problems such as fertility and mortality. He also argues that Mironov accepts too uncritically the utility of the statistical data at hand. Boris Mironov responds to Wagnar, Sunderland, and Hoch in turn.
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 59, Heft 1, S. 219-221
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Marriage, Property, and Law in Late Imperial Russia, S. 292-336
In: Marriage, Property, and Law in Late Imperial Russia, S. 226-253
In: Marriage, Property, and Law in Late Imperial Russia, S. 206-224
In: Marriage, Property, and Law in Late Imperial Russia, S. 337-377
In: Marriage, Property, and Law in Late Imperial Russia, S. 101-137
In: Marriage, Property, and Law in Late Imperial Russia, S. 138-205