Suchergebnisse

Cover -- Half-Title -- Title -- Copyright -- Contents -- Foreword -- Acknowledgements -- Notes on the Contributors -- 1. Introduction -- 2. What Welfare Provisions Do Women Need to Become Full Citizens? -- 3. Work, Gender and Unemployment: a Household Perspective -- 4. Caring for Children -- 5. What Do Older Women Want? -- 6. Women's Pension Poverty: Prospects and Options for Change -- 7. Revisiting the Sex Equality Laws -- 8. Violence against Women: a Policy of Neglect or a Neglect of Policy? -- 9. A Crisis in Masculinity, or New Agendas for Men? -- 10. Rethinking the Boundaries of Political Representation -- 11. Sexing Political Behaviour in Britain -- Index.

Femicide is a key global indicator of progress towards gender equality. The occurrence of some but not all five gender dimensions in the indicators of violence used to measure progress towards United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 5, 11 and 16 are analysed as resulting from the tension between divergent feminist strategies that focus either on women-only or on mainstreaming intersecting inequalities. The tension between universalist and particularist projects underlies the contestations over the construction of these gendered indicators. The analysis develops a conceptualisation of indicators as assets in order to capture the social relations of power involved (rather than as boundary objects), supported by platforms (which can be public as well as corporate) and generated by dynamic epistemic systems (rather than stable epistemological infrastructures).

What are the varieties of gender regimes? The focus is the theory of varieties of gender regimes—domestic and public regimes; and, within the public, both neoliberal and social democratic varieties—and pathways to alternative forms. Is this model sufficient to encompass the turn to less progressive forms and multiple global regions or are further varieties needed? At stake here is the distinction between modern and premodern, public and domestic, the meaning of conservative, the concept of the family, and the theorization of violence. The article offers engagement with critics and further development of the theory.

Social theory is developing in response to the coronavirus (COVID) crisis. Fundamental questions about social justice in the relationship of individuals to society are raised by Delanty in his review of political philosophy, including Agamben, Foucault and Žižek. However, the focus on the libertarian critique of authoritarianism is not enough. The social democratic critique of neoliberalism lies at the centre of the contesting responses to the COVID crisis. A social democratic perspective on public health, democracy and state action is contrasted with the anti-statists of left and right. This is addressed in debates on the relationship between science and governance, the place of crisis in theories of change and the conceptualisation of alternative forms of social formation. The crisis initiated by the pandemic, cascading through society, from health to economy, to polity and into violence, includes a contestation between social democratic and neoliberal visions of alternative forms of society.

This article analyses the gender dimension of the European Commission's proposals to revise the governance of the European Union in response to the crisis by increasing the powers of the European Union level. The proposed change in the location of the subsidiarity boundary has significant gender implications: subsidiarity is gendered. The alternative strategies for economic growth and security have implications for democracy and gender equality. The concepts of 'gender regime' (and its social-democratic and neoliberal varieties) and 'project' are developed and applied. The possibility of the embedding of the gender-equality project in the new institutions proposed by the Commission is discussed.

Is Europe cascading into fascism? The answer to this question matters for understanding the opposition to gender equality projects in Europe. The article addresses some of the key concepts needed to answer this question. Is 'fascism' or 'authoritarian neoliberalism' or just 'neoliberalism' the most appropriate concept to capture the turn to the right? The article compares the extent to which these concepts encompass 'violence' and 'gender'. 'Fascism' is an important benchmarkfrom European history, but Europe has not yet reached its levels of violence. The qualifier 'authoritarian' is not needed for 'neoliberalism' since it generates a trajectory towards violence. Some conceptual work is required in order to develop 'neoliberalism' to encompass 'gender' and 'violence', but there are bodies of work that support such a development. Including gender in analyses of the macro level changes occurring in Europe requires the concept of 'varieties of gender regime', which enables the conceptualisation of neoliberalism as gendered.

The purpose of the Study is to measure the cost of trafficking in human beings in the European Union. Trafficking in human beings is a particularly serious crime, driven by profits and involves a chain of actors who are knowingly or unknowingly involved. "It brings high profits to the perpetrators, who abuse people's vulnerabilities and exploit the demand for the services provided by the victims. It results in long-term harm to its victims, our societies and economies." It is a violation of fundamental rights that causes immense harm to the victims. It has economic, social and human costs. The existence of trafficking in human beings is a cost to the wider economy and society by creating need for public services, in diverting resources away from the legal economy, and in its effects on the quality of life. Measuring the cost of trafficking in human beings in a monetary form is done in order to improve the quality of decision-making where cost-benefit analysis is relevant to decisions over the allocation of public resources. Translating trafficking in human beings into a cost is relevant to public policy concerning developing the European area of freedom, security and justice, and the Single European Market. This Study is a key Commission action to build a sound knowledge base for the 2017 Commission Communication "Reporting on the follow up to the EU Strategy towards the eradication of trafficking in human beings and identifying further concrete actions" and the EU Anti-trafficking Directive.