Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
15 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International studies review, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 165-172
ISSN: 1468-2486
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 28, Heft 3, S. 378-381
ISSN: 1467-9221
In: International studies review, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 486-488
ISSN: 1468-2486
In: International studies review, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 486-488
ISSN: 1521-9488
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 23, Heft 3, S. 635-636
ISSN: 0162-895X
In: Advances in Foreign Policy Analysis Ser
In: Advances in foreign policy analysis
Focusing on how policy makers make decisions in foreign policy, this book examines how beliefs are causal mechanisms which steer decisions, shape leaders and perceptions of reality, and lead to cognitive and motivated biases that distort, block and recast incoming information from the environment.
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies
"Operational Code Theory: Beliefs and Foreign Policy Decisions" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 28, Heft 6, S. 747-776
ISSN: 1467-9221
The conventional account of American diplomacy in the modern era is marked by a cultural tension between realist and idealist themes symbolized by the statecraft of Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. However, a revisionist account has emerged to challenge and even reverse the conventional account of Roosevelt and Wilson. This poses an intriguing empirical puzzle that is essentially psychological, as it pertains to the belief systems of these two presidents. In order to investigate this puzzle and its implications for U.S. strategic culture, we employ an automated content analysis of the public statements by the two leaders regarding their operational code beliefs about the nature of the political universe and the best approach to effective political action. The results reveal similarities and differences in their belief systems and illustrate how psychological models can provide insights into the psychocultural origins of U.S. diplomacy that remain relevant to the present day.
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 50, Heft 3, S. 561-583
ISSN: 0020-8833, 1079-1760
World Affairs Online
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 50, Heft 3, S. 561-583
ISSN: 1468-2478
In: Foreign policy analysis, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 113-135
ISSN: 1743-8594
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 23, Heft 3, S. 635
ISSN: 0162-895X
In: Statistical papers, Band 51, Heft 2, S. 337-347
ISSN: 1613-9798
World Affairs Online