Suchergebnisse

A collection of essays on the politics of boundaries, this book addresses a broad range of cases, some geographical, some legal, and some involving less tangible practices of inclusion and exclusion. The book begins by exploring the boundary between modern Western forms of international relations and their constitutive outsides. Beyond this, the author engages with relations between subjectivity and security, security and nature, social movements and a world politics, as well as the politics of spatiotemporal dislocation. Two chapters address the work of Thomas Hobbes and Max Weber as exemplar

Este capítulo es parte de un libro contextualizado en la etapa inicial de la post Guerra Fría y los debates sobre la democratización global y el triunfo de la democracia liberal como modelo político. El texto invita a diversas reflexiones sobre la temporalidad y la espacialidad de la democracia en la teoría política, la eficacia de su aplicabilidad, y la falta de cuestionamiento sobre lo que la "democracia" implica más allá de su "encanto cosmopolita". ; This chapter is part of a book contextualized in the early Post Cold War era, and within the debates regarding global democratization and the triumph of liberal democracy as political model. The text invites to diverse reflections about the temporality and spatiality of democracy in political theory, the efficiency of its applicability, and the lack of questioning regards what "democracy" implies beyond its "cosmopolitan charm".

Este capítulo es parte de un libro contextualizado en la etapa inicial de la post Guerra Fría y los debates sobre la democratización global y el triunfo de la democracia liberal como modelo político. El texto invita a diversas reflexiones sobre la temporalidad y la espacialidad de la democracia en la teoría política, la eficacia de su aplicabilidad, y la falta de cuestionamiento sobre lo que la "democracia" implica más allá de su "encanto cosmopolita".

This chapter is part of a book contextualized in the early Post Cold War era, and within the debates regarding global democratization and the triumph of liberal democracy as political model. The text invites to diverse reflections about the temporality and spatiality of democracy in political theory, the efficiency of its applicability, and the lack of questioning regards what "democracy" implies beyond its "cosmopolitan charm". ; Este capítulo es parte de un libro contextualizado en la etapa inicial de la post Guerra Fría y los debates sobre la democratización global y el triunfo de la democracia liberal como modelo político. El texto invita a diversas reflexiones sobre la temporalidad y la espacialidad de la democracia en la teoría política, la eficacia de su aplicabilidad, y la falta de cuestionamiento sobre lo que la "democracia" implica más allá de su "encanto cosmopolita".

Barkawi and Laffey engage with Hardt and Negri's Empire as a reminder of what an institutionalised Anglo-American tradition of international relations theory misses or misconstrues when it focuses on the logic of the modern states system. Like Barkawi and Laffey, I am unpersuaded by the claim that `a global order, a new logic and structure of rule—in short, a new form of sovereignty' has emerged. However, Barkawi and Laffey avoid engaging with the primary theoretical moves enabling this claim. These moves connect a claim about immanence in the philosophical struggles of early-European modernity with a claim about the imminence of a new form of political order arising from a process of internalisation of the interstate system. It is because this relationship is not placed under suspicion that Hardt and Negri over-interpret many important observations within an updated but conventional, and unsatisfactory, account of a universalising history.