Carryover Effects of Self-Control on Decision Making: A Construal-Level Perspective
In: Journal of consumer research: JCR ; an interdisciplinary journal, Band 38, Heft 1, S. 199-214
ISSN: 1537-5277
12 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of consumer research: JCR ; an interdisciplinary journal, Band 38, Heft 1, S. 199-214
ISSN: 1537-5277
In: Journal of consumer research: JCR ; an interdisciplinary journal, Band 36, Heft 3, S. 448-462
ISSN: 1537-5277
In: Journal of consumer research: JCR ; an interdisciplinary journal, Band 39, Heft 5, S. 977-992
ISSN: 1537-5277
In: Journal of consumer research: JCR ; an interdisciplinary journal, Band 46, Heft 4, S. 808-824
ISSN: 1537-5277
AbstractThis research examines the effect of social exclusion on consumers' preferences for visual density. Based on seven experimental studies, we reveal that consumers who perceive themselves as socially excluded evaluate products with dense visual patterns more positively than their nonexcluded peers. This effect occurs because social exclusion triggers a feeling of psychological emptiness and dense patterns can provide a sense of being "filled," which helps to alleviate this feeling of emptiness. This effect is attenuated when consumers physically fill something or experience a feeling of "temporal density" (i.e., imagining a busy schedule with many tasks packed into a short time). These results shed light on consumers' socially grounded product aesthetic preferences and offer practical implications for marketers, designers, and policy makers.
In: Journal of consumer research: JCR ; an interdisciplinary journal, Band 40, Heft 6, S. 1109-1122
ISSN: 1537-5277
In: Journal of consumer research: JCR ; an interdisciplinary journal, Band 40, Heft 1, S. 122-135
ISSN: 1537-5277
Abstract
This research examines the effects of social exclusion on a critical aspect of consumer behavior, financial decision-making. Specifically, four lab experiments and one field survey uncover how feeling isolated or ostracized causes consumers to pursue riskier but potentially more profitable financial opportunities. These daring proclivities do not appear driven by impaired affect or self-esteem. Rather, interpersonal rejection exacerbates financial risk-taking by heightening the instrumentality of money (as a substitute for popularity) to obtain benefits in life. Invariably, the quest for wealth that ensues tends to adopt a riskier but potentially more lucrative road. The article concludes by discussing the implications of its findings for behavioral research as well as for societal and individual welfare.
In: Journal of consumer research: JCR ; an interdisciplinary journal, Band 35, Heft 6, S. 1026-1038
ISSN: 1537-5277
In: Journal of consumer research: JCR ; an interdisciplinary journal
ISSN: 1537-5277
In: Journal of consumer research: JCR ; an interdisciplinary journal, S. ucw074
ISSN: 1537-5277
In: Journal of consumer research: JCR ; an interdisciplinary journal, Band 50, Heft 2, S. 303-321
ISSN: 1537-5277
Abstract
Previous research has found that for men, activating a mating motive increases luxury consumption as a way to attract a romantic partner. However, little is known about the role of luxury consumption in women's romantic endeavors. The present research conceptualizes a mate screening motive, which explains how women use luxury consumption to romantically signal to men. Six studies and two follow-ups conducted in controlled and field settings show that the mate screening motive boosts women's consumption of luxury goods as a way to signal their mating standards to men and thereby deter undesirable pursuers. The effect is diminished when mate screening is less necessary such as when external screening tools are available (e.g., screening filters on dating websites), the quality of potential mates is high, and the focus is on selecting a desirable partner rather than deterring undesirable pursuers. The findings have important implications for understanding how consumers use products and brands in romantic relationships and for designing marketing strategies and communication for luxury brands, commercial dating services, and dating apps. Our findings also provide insights for consumers on how to use brands and products as effective communication devices in romantic endeavors.
In: Journal of consumer research: JCR ; an interdisciplinary journal, Band 50, Heft 1, S. 142-166
ISSN: 1537-5277
Abstract
Websites commonly use visual formats to display numerical product ratings. Highlighting the overlooked notion of the "aesthetics" of product ratings, the current research examines how the shape of basic visual rating units (rectangular vs. non-rectangular) influences product preference. Seven experiments (and 23 supplementary experiments; N = 17,994) demonstrate a visual rounding effect. Specifically, compared to the rectangular rating format (e.g., bar ratings), the non-rectangular rating format (e.g., star ratings) increases product preference when product ratings (e.g., 3.7, 3.8, 3.9) are below the nearest integer. In contrast, the non-rectangular rating format decreases product preference when product ratings (e.g., 4.1, 4.2, 4.3) are above the nearest integer. Occurring for both the overall rating and by-attribute ratings of a product, the visual rounding effect results from a visual completeness restoration process, wherein consumers perceive non-rectangular rating units to be incomplete after vertical cutting. This research contributes to the product rating and visual marketing literatures and provides actionable implications by demonstrating what visual rating format should be adopted based on rating distribution, how the visual rounding effect can be prevented if needed, and who are even more susceptible to the visual rounding effect.
In: Journal of consumer research: JCR ; an interdisciplinary journal
ISSN: 1537-5277
Abstract
The present research proposes a new perspective to investigate the effect of product anthropomorphism on consumers' comparative judgment strategy in comparing two anthropomorphized (vs. two nonanthropomorphized) product options in a consideration set. Six experiments show that anthropomorphism increases consumers' use of an absolute judgment strategy (vs. a dimension-by-dimension strategy) in comparative judgment, leading to increased preference for the option with a more favorable overall evaluation over the option with a greater number of superior dimensions. The effect is mediated by consumers' perception of each anthropomorphized product alternative as an integrated entity rather than a bundle of separate attributes. The authors find the effect to be robust by directly tracing the process of participants' information processing using MouseLab software and eye-tracking techniques, and by self-reported preferences and real consumption choices. Moreover, the effect is moderated by the motivation to seek maximized accuracy or ease. These studies have important implications for theories about anthropomorphism and comparative judgment as well as marketing practice.