Suchergebnisse

This article studied on the stakeholder analysis of environmental policymaking process in Thailand for classifying and analyzing the power and interests of stakeholders. The results illustrated the importance and influence among them and leaded to the better understanding about the environmental policymaking process of Thailand. This findings advantaged in the public administration aspect concerning the natural resources and environmental management by fulfill the gap to avoid undesirable affected that may harm the further the environmental policymaking process. The results found that the most important stakeholders are those who make final policy decisions in Thailand's Environmental Policymaking Process. They are three decision-makers; the Cabinet, the Minister of Natural Resources and Environment and the National Environment Board. They all have a legal and presumed claim and ability to influence policy decision making. The second group is the citizens, the communities, and the international organizations eager to democratize the natural resources and environmental management because they believe that liberalization from state hands could lead to better public accessibility and better the self-immunity, which, in turn, would enhance the efficiency and fairness in the utilization of natural resources and the country's democracy. Nevertheless, the results significantly indicated that the first group influenced the environmental policymaking process of Thailand in their direction more than the second group due to their power and interests.

This study has tried to deal with good governance by taking into account the public service issue, and it is functioning in delivering effective and efficient Government performance. To deal with this study, the researcher has incorporated seven key indicators of good governance that are transparency responsiveness, Accountability, Participation, Rule of low Efficiency, and effectiveness to assess the situation of good governance in the city administration concerning government performance. The researcher incorporates these seven indicators because the more the indicators are incorporated, for an in-depth study; to get enough information. The investigation result shows the good governance principles are not implemented as expected in government organizations' to push for the admirable result of government performance. Because results indicate that good governance principles are significantly correlated to government performance. Implications of these findings are discussed, and suggestions for future studies are recommended.