The American labor movement in the age of Obama: the challenges and opportunities of a racialized political economy
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 8, Heft 3, S. 847-860
ISSN: 1537-5927
13 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 8, Heft 3, S. 847-860
ISSN: 1537-5927
World Affairs Online
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 8, Heft 3, S. 847-860
ISSN: 1541-0986
The relative weakness of the American labor movement has broader political consequences, particularly for the ambitions of the Obama presidency. Absent a strong countervailing political constituency like organized labor, well-organized and more powerful stakeholders like business and industry groups are able to exert undue influence in American democracy, thereby frustrating attempts at political reform. I argue that it is impossible to understand the current political situation confronting the Obama administration without an account of the underlying sources of labor weakness in the U.S. In such an account two factors loom especially large. One is the role of the state in structuring labor market institutions and the rules of the game for labor-business interactions. The second is the distinctively racialized character of the U.S. political economy, which has contributed to labor market segmentation, a unique political geography, and the racial division of the U.S. working class. In our current post-industrial, post-civil rights racial and economic order, whether and how the labor movement can overcome its historical racial fragmentation will determine its possibilities for renewal and ultimately its political strength in relation to the Obama presidency. If the labor movement remains an uneven and weak regional organization hobbled by racial fragmentation, the Obama Administration's efforts to advance its core policy agenda will lack the necessary political force to be effective.
In: Polity, Band 42, Heft 3, S. 286-292
ISSN: 1744-1684
In: Polity: the journal of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Band 42, Heft 3, S. 286-293
ISSN: 0032-3497
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 677-679
ISSN: 1541-0986
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 677-679
ISSN: 1537-5927
In: Social service review: SSR, Band 79, Heft 1, S. 193-197
ISSN: 1537-5404
In: New labor forum: a journal of ideas, analysis and debate, Band 14, Heft 3, S. 17-23
ISSN: 1095-7960
In: Du bois review: social science research on race, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 395-417
ISSN: 1742-0598
AbstractPopular discourse and academic scholarship both accent divisions between African American and immigrant workers. These debates most often focus on the question of job competition, positioning African Americans and immigrant workers asa prioriadversaries in the labor market. We take a different tack. Drawing upon a case study of hotel workers in Chicago, we identify ways in which workers themselves challenge and bridge these divisions. Specifically, we reveal how union organizing activities, such as diverse committee representation and inclusion of diversity language in contracts, counter notions of intergroup competition in an effort to build common cause that affirms rather than denies differences. We argue that these activities represent political efforts on the part of workers to contest and even reshape the racial and ethnic division of labor, thereby revealing competition as a socially contingent and politically mediated process.
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 677-678
ISSN: 1537-5927
Race has been present at every critical moment in American political development, shaping political institutions, political discourse, public policy, and its denizens' political identities. But because of the nature of race-its evolving and dynamic status as a structure of inequality, a political organizing principle, an ideology, and a system of power-we must study the politics of race historically, institutionally, and discursively.Covering more than three hundred years of American political history from the founding to the contemporary moment, the contributors in this volume make this exten
In: Politics, Groups, and Identities, Band 12, Heft 1, S. 245-256
ISSN: 2156-5511
In: Du bois review: social science research on race, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 37-57
ISSN: 1742-0598
Although political science provides many useful tools for analyzing the effects of natural and social catastrophes such as Hurricane Katrina and its aftermath, the scenes of devastation and inequality in New Orleans suggest an urgent need to adjust our lenses and reorient our research in ways that will help us to uncover and unpack the roots of this national travesty. Treated merely as exceptions to the "normal" functioning of society, dramatic events such as Katrina ought instead to serve as crucial reminders to scholars and the public that the quest for racial equality is only a work in progress. New Orleans, we argue, was not exceptional; it was the product of broader and very typical elements of American democracy—its ideology, attitudes, and institutions. At the dawn of the centuryafter"the century of the color-line," the hurricane and its aftermath highlight salient features of inequality in the United States that demand broader inquiry and that should be incorporated into the analytic frameworks through which American politics is commonly studied and understood. To this end, we suggest several ways in which the study of racial and other forms of inequality might inform the study of U.S. politics writ large, as well as offer a few ideas about ways in which the study of race might be re-politicized. To bring race back into the study of politics, we argue for greater attention to the ways that race intersects with other forms of inequality, greater attention to political institutions as they embody and reproduce these inequalities, and a return to the study of power, particularly its role in the maintenance of ascriptive hierarchies.