Suchergebnisse

Context People and wildlife are coming into greater contact worldwide because of the increasing human footprint. Although some species tolerate certain levels of human activities, others are vulnerable to human disturbance, potentially altering their spatial or temporal patterns of activity in response to disturbance by humans. Aims We evaluated the influence of human activity on burrow activity of the Chinese pangolin, a Critically Endangered species that is heavily persecuted for subsistence and illegal trade. Methods We deployed remotely triggered camera traps at pangolin burrows located at four sites with contrasting levels of human density and infrastructure in Nepal, and estimated burrow-activity patterns of pangolins by using a kernel-density estimator based on the time stamp of camera trap observations. Key results Our findings did not suggest that anthropogenic disturbance affected pangolin burrow activity, but we acknowledge that these findings were based on a limited number of observations. Peak pangolin burrow activity was observed after midnight in three of the study sites, including those with highest and lowest levels of human activity. The fourth area, which had intermediate levels of human activity, had an earlier peak in burrow activity, possibly caused by prey deficiency owing to intense agriculture. Conclusions We suggest that pangolins may tolerate human activity because of their strictly nocturnal temporal niche, but that this tolerance has made them vulnerable to poaching because it allows them to co-exist spatially with humans. Implications Nocturnal species may be particularly prone to non-conflict-related persecution, because they may be easily accessible targets for illegal hunting activities.

Despite being heavily exploited, pangolins (Pholidota: Manidae) have been subject to limited research, resulting in a lack of reliable population estimates and standardised survey methods for the eight extant species. Camera trapping represents a unique opportunity for broad-scale collaborative species monitoring due to its largely nondiscriminatory nature, which creates considerable volumes of data on a relatively wide range of species. This has the potential to shed light on the ecology of rare, cryptic and understudied taxa, with implications for conservation decision-making. We undertook a global analysis of available pangolin data from camera trapping studies across their range in Africa and Asia. Our aims were (1) to assess the utility of existing camera trapping efforts as a method for monitoring pangolin populations, and (2) to gain insights into the distribution and ecology of pangolins. We analysed data collated from 103 camera trap surveys undertaken across 22 countries that fell within the range of seven of the eight pangolin species, which yielded more than half a million trap nights and 888 pangolin encounters. We ran occupancy analyses on three species (Sunda pangolin Manis javanica, white-bellied pangolin Phataginus tricuspis and giant pangolin Smutsia gigantea). Detection probabilities varied with forest cover and levels of human influence for P. tricuspis, but were low (<0.05) for all species. Occupancy was associated with distance from rivers for M. javanica and S. gigantea, elevation for P. tricuspis and S. gigantea, forest cover for P. tricuspis and protected area status for M. javanica and P. tricuspis. We conclude that camera traps are suitable for the detection of pangolins and large-scale assessment of their distributions. However, the trapping effort required to monitor populations at any given study site using existing methods appears prohibitively high. This may change in the future should anticipated technological and methodological advances in camera trapping facilitate greater sampling efforts and/or higher probabilities of detection. In particular, targeted camera placement for pangolins is likely to make pangolin monitoring more feasible with moderate sampling efforts. (c) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. ; Fondation Segr~e; Biodiversity Monitoring Centre (Centre de Surveillance de la Biodiversit ~e) at the Faculty of Sciences of the University of Kisangani; Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR); Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (DST)Department of Science & Technology (India) [SR/S0/AS-100/2007]; Ministry of Education MalaysiaMinistry of Education, Malaysia [NRGS 2013/1088/02]; U.S. National Science FoundationNational Science Foundation (NSF) [BCS 1266389]; AXA Research Fellowship; Gordon and Betty Moore FoundationGordon and Betty Moore Foundation ; Thank you to the many individuals and institutions who generously made their data available for this study, and to the Zoological Society of London and donors to the IUCN SSC Pangolin Specialist Group for supporting the time of HK and CB during their research internships. The authors are grateful to Fondation Segr~e for supporting this research. AL would like to thank the Biodiversity Monitoring Centre (Centre de Surveillance de la Biodiversit ~e) at the Faculty of Sciences of the University of Kisangani and the Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) for financial, academic and logistical support. AM would like to thank Agence Nationale des Parcs Nationaux and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique for kindly granting permission to conduct research in Gabon. CKO and TB would like to thank the Nouabal~e-Ndoki Foundation and Ministry of Forest Economy, Republic of Congo for kindly providing research permissions. GVG would like to gratefully thank the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India for their funding (DST. No. SR/S0/AS-100/2007), Mr. K. M. Selvan and Mr. S. Lyngdoh for their support in field data collection, and the Department of Environment & Forest, Government of Arunachal Pradesh for permissions. JAMwas supported by Ministry of Education Malaysia (NRGS 2013/1088/02). LAI acknowledges support from the U.S. National Science Foundation (BCS 1266389). ORW was supported by an AXA Research Fellowship. SE would like to thank R. Mueller and R. Roder for their input into data processing. Some data in this publication was provided by the Tropical Ecology Assessment and Monitoring (TEAM) Network, a collaboration between Conservation International, the Smithsonian Institution, and the Wildlife Conservation Society, and partially funded by these institutions, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and other donors.