Suchergebnisse

Context Wildlife is ubiquitous in urban environments, resulting in frequent interactions with humans and human infrastructure. The result of these interactions is often negative, in the form of road injury, orphaning of dependent young or eviction from natural home ranges. Wildlife rehabilitation programmes are devised to counter these negative interactions. However, the success of current management strategies is rarely assessed. Aims We aimed to determine whether short-term survival of juvenile hand-reared common brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) released in the wild was a function of (1) intrinsic factors such as sex, individual personality and level of human habituation, and (2) extrinsic factors such as release practice (soft vs hard-release) or location (urban vs rural). We also evaluated the relationship between habituation to humans and time spent in care by possums, if presence of conspecifics during the rehabilitation process influenced the development of individual personality, and if this differed in hand-raised animals compared with wild individuals. Methods We radio-tracked and monitored 20 hand-reared juvenile possums (10 females and 10 males) for up to 40 days after release in the wild. Key results Eight possums (40%) survived until the end of the study, nine possums (45%) were killed by foxes or had to be returned into care and three possums (15%) had unknown fates (i.e. lost VHF signal). We found that more exploratory individuals and those less human-habituated were more likely to be successful in the wild in both rural and urban areas, whether or not they were hard or soft released. Conclusions Our results suggest that personality is a key criterion to consider when evaluating the success of rehabilitation programmes. Behavioural traits of hand-reared brushtail possums differed significantly from those of wild individuals, showing that captive conditions can affect the development of personality. Hand-reared possums that spent more time in care were also more likely to display highly human-habituated behaviours. Implications By demonstrating which factors influence success of hand-reared wildlife after release in the wild, our results help in evaluating current rearing and release practices, and improve the evidence base for developing best practice wildlife rehabilitation guidelines.

Abstract Context Providing wildlife with supplementary water is a conservation technique that offers an immediate positive impact to animals. However, the potential negative impacts should be assessed. Aims We aimed to assess the potential negative effects of water stations on visiting wildlife due to the risk of predation and disease transmission. Methods We assessed potential benefits and costs of water supplementation in rural Australia by investigating the behavioural response of animals, at koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) water stations, to weather and to previous visitor species. To determine the risk of disease transmission, water and swab samples were taken from the water stations. Faecal contamination was quantified, and real-time PCR was used to identify various pathogens, including Chlamydia. Key results We found that koalas, brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) and foxes (Vulpes vulpes) responded to hot, dry weather with longer visits to water stations, indicating a benefit of water supplementation to native wildlife, but also to invasive species. Native animals did not alter their behaviour when their visits were preceded by another species, even when this was a potential predator. The presence of pathogens (i.e. Chlamydia and C. perfringens) at the stations did not depend on the number of species that visited but was higher in summer (December to February), representing a potential risk of disease transmission. Conclusions Water stations are an effective conservation tool because they can benefit threatened species during hot, dry weather, but there are risks associated with using supplemental water. Implications Although potential risks are low, they should still be considered. Efforts should be taken to exclude invasive species and water stations should be cleaned regularly while appropriate personal protective equipment is worn.