A partir de la identificación de dimensiones de sostenibilidad, tanto en los ámbitos museológicos como del desarrollo, se encuentran afinidades epistémicas respecto a lo que representa la sostenibilidad para los museos y las comunidades en un plano más amplio. Se analiza cómo museos de pequeña escala, con aciertos y limitaciones, aportan a la sostenibilidad y desarrollo de la comunidad a la que pertenecen. Mediante la caracterización y análisis de tres casos de estudio en la Región de los Ríos, Chile, se identifican dimensiones sinérgicas que desde lo empírico aportan a la discusión teórica sobre la sostenibilidad y valores relacionales como la colaboración, reciprocidad y pertinencia. Se concluye que la proyección de este tipo de museos, se asienta, primero, en la capacidad de ejercer reflexión crítica, segundo, en la construcción de nuevas racionalidades ambientales y culturales y, tercero, en la aparición de nuevos actores sociales cuyas disposiciones afectivas viabilicen la sostenibilidad situadamente.
In: Alcohol and alcoholism: the international journal of the Medical Council on Alcoholism (MCA) and the journal of the European Society for Biomedical Research on Alcoholism (ESBRA), Band 50, Heft suppl 1, S. i30.2-i30
The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) was launched in 2000. To understand why some national programs have been more successful than others, a panel of individuals with expertise in LF elimination efforts met to assess available data from programs in 8 countries. The goal was to identify: 1) the factors determining success for national LF elimination programs (defined as the rapid, sustained reduction in microfilaremia/antigenemia after repeated mass drug administration [MDA]): 2) the priorities for operational research to enhance LF elimination efforts. Of more than 40 factors identified, the most prominent were 1) initial level of LF endemicity: 2) effectiveness of vector mosquitoes; 3) MDA drug regimen: 4) population compliance. Research important for facilitating program success was identified as either biologic (i.e., [1] quantifying differences in vectorial capacity; [2] identifying seasonal variations affecting LF transmission) or programmatic (i.e., [1] identifying quantitative thresholds, especially the population compliance levels necessary for success, and the antigenemia or microfilaremia prevalence at which MDA programs can stop with minimal risk of resumption of transmission; [2] defining optimal drug distribution strategies and timing; [3] identifying those individuals who are "persistently noncompliant" during MDAs, the reasons for this non-compliance and approaches to overcoming it). While addressing these challenges is important, many key determinants of program success are already clearly understood; operationalizing these as soon as possible will greatly increase the potential for national program success.