The Use of Force and International Law. By Christian Henderson. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Pp. xi, 428. Index
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 113, Issue 4, p. 856-862
ISSN: 2161-7953
17 results
Sort by:
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 113, Issue 4, p. 856-862
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: Austrian review of international and European law: ARIEL, Volume 16, Issue 1, p. 33-40
ISSN: 1573-6512
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Volume 104, p. 502-503
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 101, Issue 1, p. 241-246
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: Intervention, Terrorism, and Torture, p. 137-153
In: Sukin, Lauren and Allen S. Weiner. "War and Words: The International Use of Force in the United Nations Charter Era." Forthcoming in Challenges to the International Legal Order. David Sloss, ed. Oxford University Press (2022).
SSRN
In: Dynamics of asymmetric conflict, Volume 7, Issue 2-3, p. 198-225
ISSN: 1746-7594
In: International security, Volume 45, Issue 4, p. 126-166
ISSN: 1531-4804
Abstract
In 2013, the U.S. government announced that its nuclear war plans would be "consistent with the fundamental principles of the Law of Armed Conflict" and would "apply the principles of distinction and proportionality and seek to minimize collateral damage to civilian populations and civilian objects." If properly applied, these legal principles can have a profound impact on U.S. nuclear doctrine. The prohibition against targeting civilians means that "countervalue" targeting and "minimum deterrence" strategies are illegal. The principle of distinction and the impermissibility of reprisal against civilians make it illegal for the United States, contrary to what is implied in the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review, to intentionally target civilians even in reprisal for a strike against U.S. or allied civilians. The principle of proportionality permits some, but not all, potential U.S. counterforce nuclear attacks against military targets. The precautionary principle means that the United States must use conventional weapons or the lowest-yield nuclear weapons that would be effective against legitimate military targets. The law of armed conflict also restricts targeting of an enemy's leadership to officials in the military chain of command or directly participating in hostilities, meaning that broad targeting to destroy an enemy's entire political leadership is unlawful.
In: International security
ISSN: 0162-2889
World Affairs Online
In: American journal of international law, Volume 101, Issue 1, p. 259-263
ISSN: 0002-9300
In: Bulletin of the atomic scientists, Volume 76, Issue 4, p. 157-165
ISSN: 1938-3282
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Volume 104, p. 1-2
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: Peace and conflict: journal of peace psychology ; the journal of the Society for the Study of Peace, Conflict, and Violence, Peace Psychology Division of the American Psychological Association, Volume 28, Issue 4, p. 521-527
ISSN: 1532-7949
In: International security, Volume 46, Issue 2, p. 166-172
ISSN: 1531-4804