Suchergebnisse

Cover -- Half Title -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Table of Contents -- Dedication -- List of Tables -- Acknowledgements -- List of Abbreviations -- Introduction -- 1: Party Development in Russia: Putting Theory into Practice -- 2: Yabloko: The Roots of the Party -- 3: Russia's Divided Liberals, 1993-2003 -- 4: Yabloko: Policies, Social Base and Electoral Strategy -- 5: Yabloko: Organisation, Cohesion, Membership and Funding -- 6: Yabloko and Power -- Conclusion -- Appendices -- Bibliography -- Index

Vladimir Putin's state-building project, which has included a 'war on the oligarchs', the reining in of regional power, the co-optation or marginalization of civil society and political opposition, and the establishment of a 'power vertical', has not been based on state strengthening but has had much more to do with regime consolidation. It is argued that, in the Russian case, the building of state capacity may not be a crucial factor in determining the medium or even the long-term survival of the authoritarian system. Although Russia has relatively weak state capacity, the Putin regime has remained stable. The regime's resilience is built on the distribution of rents among political and economic elites, the provision of social welfare, the coercion or co-opting of civil society and political opposition, and the mobilization of public support through the provision of economic benefits and national-patriotic appeal.

Through a focus on the 2016 Russian parliamentary election, this article seeks to assess the strength of the Putin regime and the nature of the system itself. In contrast to those who have heralded its imminent decline, it is argued that the regime continues to display great resilience, the election providing evidence of the regime's adaptability and its ability to cope with challenges. The nature of the regime is also questioned. It has become commonplace for scholars to refer to Russia's political system under the presidency of Vladimir Putin as "electoral authoritarian". The article examines the function of elections in such systems, with a particular emphasis on the way in which elections provide the regime with legitimacy. The conduct and outcome of the elections not only points to the confidence and resilience of the Putin regime but might also suggest that a declining reliance on elections to sustain the regime may lead to a re-appraisal of the electoral authoritarian model as a compelling conceptualization of the Russian political system.

The electoral decline of liberal parties has been a key feature of post-Soviet politics in Russia. Using Mikhail Khodorkovsky's critique of Russian liberalism as a starting point for analysis, it is argued that a lack of cohesion and unity has undermined support for liberal-democratic forces. Ultimately, however, exogenous factors over which the liberal parties have had no control (the marginalisation of opposition, the restriction of media access and the huge imbalance of resources available to political parties in Russia) have played the major determining role in the liberals' decline. It is argued that Russia's two main liberal parties during the Putin years were targeted by the regime because they were opposition parties. In Russia's electoral authoritarian system, political opposition has been systematically excluded and fragmented, the aim being not just to restrict but to close off any potential opportunities.

"The electoral decline of liberal parties has been a key feature of post-Soviet politics in Russia. Using Mikhail Khodorkovsky's critique of Russian liberalism as a starting point for analysis, it is argued that a lack of cohesion and unity has undermined support for liberal-democratic forces. Ultimately, however, exogenous factors over which the liberal parties have had no control (the marginalisation of opposition, the restriction of media access and the huge imbalance of resources available to political parties in Russia) have played the major determining role in the liberals' decline. It is argued that Russia's two main liberal parties during the Putin years were targeted by the regime because they were opposition parties. In Russia's electoral authoritarian system, political opposition has been systematically excluded and fragmented, the aim being not just to restrict but to close off any potential opportunities." (author's abstract)