Suchergebnisse

This edited collection looks at corruption in different arms of the British state, and calls for fundamental political change

AbstractThis article presents an analysis of recent evidence emerging from the building industry about British state tolerance, and encouragement, of an illegal 'blacklist' of workers in the industry. As part of this process, the article argues that the form of policing/regulation that is observable in the case of the blacklisted workers is one that ultimately seeks to guarantee as its primary concern, not the rule of law, but the orderly reproduction of surplus value in the building industry. The article does not suggest that the latter purpose is all that concerns policing/regulation, but it does suggest that it is the principal effect of a combination of various policing and regulatory techniques. In order to achieve orderly reproduction of surplus value, it is argued that building workers are confronted by a form of economic force which is given shape by, and ultimately underpinned by, the system of policing/regulation that at the same time, claims to protect them.

The state-corporate crime literature has given momentum to a fundamentally important task: that of "bringing the state back in" to the study of the social harms caused by corporations. Yet as this article argues, we need to widen the theoretical scope of the concept of "state-corporate crime" if we are to grasp the full significance of state-corporate symbiosis in the production of corporate crime. The article argues for a historically and systemically sensitive analysis of the state-corporate relation that takes account of the
a priori constitutional features of the relationship between states and corporations in contemporary capitalist democracies. The article therefore uses the state-corporate crime literature as a point of departure for understanding a deeper structural relation between organized capital and state institutions.