The True Tragedy of American Power
In: Parameters: the US Army War College quarterly, Band 43, Heft 4
ISSN: 2158-2106
17 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Parameters: the US Army War College quarterly, Band 43, Heft 4
ISSN: 2158-2106
In: The US Army War College quarterly parameters, Band 43, Heft 4, S. 15-26
ISSN: 0031-1723
In: Journal of international affairs, Band 60, Heft 2, S. 95-112
ISSN: 0022-197X
In: Democracy and security, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 73-104
ISSN: 1555-5860
How can a democracy & the tenets of democratic society be preserved & protected amid the contemporary security challenges that pose a threat to democracy & its tenets? As democracies fashion their new security strategies to deal with these new threats, what are the chances that some of these cures might pose more harm than good? This paper describes what has emerged over the past decade as perhaps the greatest unintended consequence facing the United States & global security: the globalization of the conventional arms market & the commercialization & "foreignization" of the US military-industrial complex. President Eisenhower's 1961 warning has come home to roost in the early 2000s, now representing an "outsourcing of national security" at risk of escalating as much as deflating the security challenges facing American democracy today. Tables, Figures. Adapted from the source document.
In: Democracy and security, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 73-104
ISSN: 1555-5860
In: Armed forces & society, Band 27, Heft 4, S. 649-652
ISSN: 1556-0848
In: World affairs: a journal of ideas and debate, Band 164, Heft 1, S. 26
ISSN: 0043-8200
In: World affairs: a journal of ideas and debate, Band 163, Heft 3, S. 99-109
ISSN: 0043-8200
In: The US Army War College quarterly parameters, Band 44, Heft 4, S. 170
ISSN: 0031-1723
In: Parameters: the US Army War College quarterly, Band 50, Heft 2
ISSN: 2158-2106
In: Parameters: the US Army War College quarterly, Band 46, Heft 4
ISSN: 2158-2106
In: International organization, Band 63, Heft 1, S. 67-106
ISSN: 1531-5088
AbstractDuring the nineteenth century, states routinely defeated insurgent foes. Over the twentieth century, however, this pattern reversed itself, with states increasingly less likely to defeat insurgents or avoid meeting at least some of their demands. What accounts for this pattern of outcomes in counterinsurgency (COIN) wars? We argue that increasing mechanization within state militaries after World War I is primarily responsible for this shift. Unlike their nineteenth-century predecessors, modern militaries possess force structures that inhibit information collection among local populations. This not only complicates the process of sifting insurgents from noncombatants but increases the difficulty of selectively applying rewards and punishment among the fence-sitting population. Modern militaries may therefore inadvertently fuel, rather than deter, insurgencies. We test this argument with a new data set of 286 insurgencies (1800–2005) and a paired comparison of two U.S. Army divisions in Iraq (2003–2004). We find that higher levels of mechanization, along with external support for insurgents and the counterinsurgent's status as an occupier, are associated with an increased probability of state defeat. By contrast, we find only partial support for conventional power- and regime-based explanations, and no support for the view that rough terrain favors insurgent success.
In: International organization, Band 1, S. 67-106
ISSN: 1531-5088
During the nineteenth century, states routinely defeated insurgent foes. Over the twentieth century, however, this pattern reversed itself, with states increasingly less likely to defeat insurgents or avoid meeting at least some of their demands. What accounts for this pattern of outcomes in counterinsurgency (COIN) wars? We argue that increasing mechanization within state militaries after World War I is primarily responsible for this shift. Unlike their nineteenth-century predecessors, modern militaries possess force structures that inhibit information collection among local populations. This not only complicates the process of sifting insurgents from noncombatants but increases the difficulty of selectively applying rewards and punishment among the fence-sitting population. Modern militaries may therefore inadvertently fuel, rather than deter, insurgencies. We test this argument with a new data set of 286 insurgencies (1800-2005) and a paired comparison of two U.S. Army divisions in Iraq (2003-2004). We find that higher levels of mechanization, along with external support for insurgents and the counterinsurgent's status as an occupier, are associated with an increased probability of state defeat. By contrast, we find only partial support for conventional power- and regime-based explanations, and no support for the view that rough terrain favors insurgent success. Adapted from the source document.
In: Armed forces & society: official journal of the Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society : an interdisciplinary journal, Band 27, Heft 4, S. 649-651
ISSN: 0095-327X
In: The US Army War College quarterly parameters, Band 44, Heft 1, S. 115-117
ISSN: 0031-1723