Suchergebnisse

Beurteilung von Parteien und Politikern nach der Bundestagswahl.
Wahlverhalten und politische Kenntnisse.

Themen: Wichtigste politische Probleme in Deutschland; kompetenteste
Partei zur Lösung dieser Probleme; Bedeutung der regierenden Partei für
den Befragten; Bewertung der letzten Bundestagswahl bezüglich
Korrektheit und Fairness; Beurteilung der Leistung der Bundesregierung
der letzten 3 Jahre; Repräsentanz der persönlichen Ansichten durch eine
Partei und einen Spitzenkandidaten; Spitzenkandidat sowie Partei, die
die Ansicht des Befragten am ehesten vertritt; Sympathie-Skalometer für
die Parteien CDU, CSU, SPD, FDP, B90/Die Grünen, Linke/PDS und NPD
sowie für Gerhard Schröder, Angela Merkel, Edmund Stoiber, Guido
Westerwelle, Joschka Fischer, Gregor Gysi, Oskar Lafontaine und Udo
Voigt; Selbsteinstufung auf einem Links-Rechts-Kontinuum sowie
Links-Rechts-Einstufung der Parteien; perzipierte Unterschiede zwischen
den Parteien; persönliche Aufmerksamkeit im Wahlkampf;
Demokratiezufriedenheit; Zufriedenheit mit der Bandbreite der
politischen Angebote und Lösungsvorschläge der Parteien; Parteinähe und
Angabe der Partei; Parteiidentifikation; Wahlbeteiligung bei der
letzten Bundestagswahl 2005 und Wahlverhalten (Erststimme und
Zweitstimme); Nichtwähler wurden gefragt: Parteipräferenz; Erwägung
einer alternativen Vergabe der Zweitstimme; Zweitpräferenz der
Zweitstimme; nichtwählbare Partei; Wahlbeteiligung bei der
Bundestagswahl 2002 und Wahlverhalten (Erststimme und Zweitstimme);
Kenntnistest der Parteipositionen zu ausgewählten Issues: Einführung
einer Bürgerversicherung, Revision der Hartz IV-Reformen sowie Revision
des Atomausstiegs.

Demographie: Alter (Geburtsjahr); Geschlecht; höchster Schulabschluss;
Familienstand; Zusammenleben mit einem Partner;
Gewerkschaftsmitgliedschaft; Gewerkschaftsmitglied im Haushalt;
Mitgliedschaft in einem Unternehmer- oder Arbeitgeberverband, einem
Landwirtschafts- oder Bauernverband bzw. einem Berufsverband;
Erwerbstätigkeit; Berufstätigkeit in der Vergangenheit; Beruf
(ISCO-88); Bildungsabschluss erforderlich für den Beruf; berufliche
Stellung; Branche; Erwerbstätigkeit und berufliche Stellung des
Partners; Beruf des Partners (ISCO-88); Branche;
Haushaltsnettoeinkommen; Haushaltsgröße; Anzahl der Kinder im Haushalt;
Kirchgangshäufigkeit; Selbsteinstufung der Religiosität; Konfession;
Sprache im Haushalt; Bundesland; Urbanisierungsgrad.

Zusätzlich verkodet wurde: Wahlkreisnummer; Ortsgröße; Bundesland
(Berlin O-W getrennt); Gewichtungsfaktoren.

Beurteilung von Parteien und Politikern. Politische Einstellungen.

Themen: Wahlverhalten bei der letzten Volkskammerwahl bzw.
Landtagswahl; Sympathie-Skalometer für SPD, CDU, CSU, FDP, Grüne und
PDS; politische Einstellung (Skala: Anomie, Unsicherheit, Ruhe und
Ordnung, Gehorsam und Disziplin, Unterordnung von Gruppeninteressen,
Ausländerfeindlichkeit, politische Betätigung von Ausländern);
Parteipräferenz (Sonntagsfrage); Einverständnis mit der Politik von
Helmut Kohl, Beurteilung der Regierungskompetenz der SPD-Opposition;
wichtigste politische Probleme; Bundeskanzlerpräferenz (Helmut Kohl
oder Oskar Lafontaine); Partei, die im günstigsten politischen
Stimmungstrend liegt; Einschätzung der erwarteten persönlichen
Wirtschaftslage; Beurteilung der zukünftigen Entwicklung Deutschlands
(Skalometer); Überwiegen von Vor- oder Nachteilen der Wiedervereinigung
für den Befragten; vermuteter Wahlsieger der gesamtdeutschen Wahl;
Zufriedenheit mit dem Stand der Wiedervereinigung; Einstellung zu
Themen über die Wiedervereinigung (Skala: Lebenssituation, Verbesserung
der Lebenslage, Konsumrummel, Träume erfüllen, Verlust positiver
Aspekte der DDR, Umzugswunsch nach Westdeutschland, abschätzige
Behandlung durch Westdeutsche, effektiveres aber inhumaneres Leben in
Westdeutschland, verlorene Zeit im früheren System, kurzfristig
erwarteter Ausgleich der Unterschiede zwischen Ost und West).

Demographie: Geschlecht; Alter; Konfession; Familienstand;
Schulabschluss; Qualifikation; Berufstätigkeit; berufliche Stellung.

The Parties' Immigration and Integration Positions Data Set (PImPo) includes data on parties' immigration and integration positions and saliency in 14 countries (Australia, Austria, Canada, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Spain, Switzerland, USA) between 1998 and 2013 based on crowd coding of parties' election manifestos. The data set entails variables on immigration and integration positions and saliency for each party in one election.
PImPo also gives data on the quasi-sentence level. Variables here include information on the topic of the quasi-sentence (immigration, integration, or none of both), the direction (supportive, sceptical, neutral), as well as information on agreement levels between crowd coders for each quasi-sentence. To make full use of this quasi-sentence level data, the original verbatim of each sentence can be added through a simple merge with the Manifesto Corpus (Lehmann, Pola / Matthieß, Theres / Merz, Nicolas / Regel, Sven / Werner, Annika (2015): Manifesto Corpus. Version: 20150708174629. Berlin: WZB Berlin Social Science Center.).
For detailed information on the dataset and its generation, please see Pola Lehmann, Malisa Zobel (2018): Positions and Saliency of Immigration in Party Manifestos. A Novel Data Set using Crowd Coding. European Journal for Political Research. Online First

The Manifesto Project Dataset provides the scientific community with parties' policy positions derived from a content analysis of parties' electoral manifestos. It covers over 1.000 parties from 1945 until today in over 50 countries on five continents.
The content analysis aims to discover party and presidential stances by quantifying their statements and messages to their electorate. A unified classification scheme with an accompanying set of rules was developed to make such statements comparable. Analysing manifestos allows for measurement of party and presidents' policy positions across countries and elections within a common framework. Manifestos are understood to be parties' only and presidential candidates' main authoritative policy statements and, therefore, as indicators of the parties' policy preferences at a given point in time.
The Manifesto Project Data Collection was originally created by the Manifesto Research Group (MRG) in the late 1970s and the 1980s. The work was continued under the name Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center in the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2009 the Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) project updates and extends the dataset. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and is still located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

The Manifesto Project Dataset provides the scientific community with parties' policy positions derived from a content analysis of parties' electoral manifestos. It covers over 1.000 parties from 1945 until today in over 50 countries on five continents.
The content analysis aims to discover party and presidential stances by quantifying their statements and messages to their electorate. A unified classification scheme with an accompanying set of rules was developed to make such statements comparable. Analysing manifestos allows for measurement of party and presidents' policy positions across countries and elections within a common framework. Manifestos are understood to be parties' only and presidential candidates' main authoritative policy statements and, therefore, as indicators of the parties' policy preferences at a given point in time.
The Manifesto Project Data Collection was originally created by the Manifesto Research Group (MRG) in the late 1970s and the 1980s. The work was continued under the name Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center in the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2009 the Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) project updates and extends the dataset. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and is still located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

The Manifesto Project Dataset provides the scientific community with parties' policy positions derived from a content analysis of parties' electoral manifestos. It covers over 1.000 parties from 1945 until today in over 50 countries on five continents.
The content analysis aims to discover party and presidential stances by quantifying their statements and messages to their electorate. A unified classification scheme with an accompanying set of rules was developed to make such statements comparable. Analysing manifestos allows for measurement of party and presidents' policy positions across countries and elections within a common framework. Manifestos are understood to be parties' only and presidential candidates' main authoritative policy statements and, therefore, as indicators of the parties' policy preferences at a given point in time.
The Manifesto Project Data Collection was originally created by the Manifesto Research Group (MRG) in the late 1970s and the 1980s. The work was continued under the name Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center in the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2009 the Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) project updates and extends the dataset. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and is still located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

The Manifesto Project Dataset provides the scientific community with parties' policy positions derived from a content analysis of parties' electoral manifestos. It covers over 1.000 parties from 1945 until today in over 50 countries on five continents.
The content analysis aims to discover party and presidential stances by quantifying their statements and messages to their electorate. A unified classification scheme with an accompanying set of rules was developed to make such statements comparable. Analysing manifestos allows for measurement of party and presidents' policy positions across countries and elections within a common framework. Manifestos are understood to be parties' only and presidential candidates' main authoritative policy statements and, therefore, as indicators of the parties' policy preferences at a given point in time.
The Manifesto Project Data Collection was originally created by the Manifesto Research Group (MRG) in the late 1970s and the 1980s. The work was continued under the name Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center in the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2009 the Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) project updates and extends the dataset. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and is still located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

The Manifesto Project Dataset provides the scientific community with parties' policy positions derived from a content analysis of parties' electoral manifestos. It covers over 1.000 parties from 1945 until today in over 50 countries on five continents.
The content analysis aims to discover party and presidential stances by quantifying their statements and messages to their electorate. A unified classification scheme with an accompanying set of rules was developed to make such statements comparable. Analysing manifestos allows for measurement of party and presidents' policy positions across countries and elections within a common framework. Manifestos are understood to be parties' only and presidential candidates' main authoritative policy statements and, therefore, as indicators of the parties' policy preferences at a given point in time.
The Manifesto Project Data Collection was originally created by the Manifesto Research Group (MRG) in the late 1970s and the 1980s. The work was continued under the name Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center in the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2009 the Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) project updates and extends the dataset. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and is still located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

The Manifesto Project Dataset provides the scientific community with parties' policy positions derived from a content analysis of parties' electoral manifestos. It covers over 1.000 parties from 1945 until today in over 50 countries on five continents.
The content analysis aims to discover party and presidential stances by quantifying their statements and messages to their electorate. A unified classification scheme with an accompanying set of rules was developed to make such statements comparable. Analysing manifestos allows for measurement of party and presidents' policy positions across countries and elections within a common framework. Manifestos are understood to be parties' only and presidential candidates' main authoritative policy statements and, therefore, as indicators of the parties' policy preferences at a given point in time.
The Manifesto Project Data Collection was originally created by the Manifesto Research Group (MRG) in the late 1970s and the 1980s. The work was continued under the name Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center in the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2009 the Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) project updates and extends the dataset. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and is still located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

The Manifesto Project Dataset provides the scientific community with parties' policy positions derived from a content analysis of parties' electoral manifestos. It covers over 1.000 parties from 1945 until today in over 50 countries on five continents.
The content analysis aims to discover party and presidential stances by quantifying their statements and messages to their electorate. A unified classification scheme with an accompanying set of rules was developed to make such statements comparable. Analysing manifestos allows for measurement of party and presidents' policy positions across countries and elections within a common framework. Manifestos are understood to be parties' only and presidential candidates' main authoritative policy statements and, therefore, as indicators of the parties' policy preferences at a given point in time.
The Manifesto Project Data Collection was originally created by the Manifesto Research Group (MRG) in the late 1970s and the 1980s. The work was continued under the name Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center in the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2009 the Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) project updates and extends the dataset. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and is still located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

The Manifesto Project Dataset provides the scientific community with parties' policy positions derived from a content analysis of parties' electoral manifestos. It covers over 1.000 parties from 1945 until today in over 50 countries on five continents.
The content analysis aims to discover party and presidential stances by quantifying their statements and messages to their electorate. A unified classification scheme with an accompanying set of rules was developed to make such statements comparable. Analysing manifestos allows for measurement of party and presidents' policy positions across countries and elections within a common framework. Manifestos are understood to be parties' only and presidential candidates' main authoritative policy statements and, therefore, as indicators of the parties' policy preferences at a given point in time.
The Manifesto Project Data Collection was originally created by the Manifesto Research Group (MRG) in the late 1970s and the 1980s. The work was continued under the name Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center in the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2009 the Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) project updates and extends the dataset. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and is still located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

The Manifesto Project Dataset provides the scientific community with parties' policy positions derived from a content analysis of parties' electoral manifestos. It covers over 1.000 parties from 1945 until today in over 50 countries on five continents.
The content analysis aims to discover party and presidential stances by quantifying their statements and messages to their electorate. A unified classification scheme with an accompanying set of rules was developed to make such statements comparable. Analysing manifestos allows for measurement of party and presidents' policy positions across countries and elections within a common framework. Manifestos are understood to be parties' only and presidential candidates' main authoritative policy statements and, therefore, as indicators of the parties' policy preferences at a given point in time.
The Manifesto Project Data Collection was originally created by the Manifesto Research Group (MRG) in the late 1970s and the 1980s. The work was continued under the name Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center in the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2009 the Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) project updates and extends the dataset. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and is still located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

The Manifesto Project Dataset provides the scientific community with parties' policy positions derived from a content analysis of parties' electoral manifestos. It covers over 1.000 parties from 1945 until today in over 50 countries on five continents.
The content analysis aims to discover party and presidential stances by quantifying their statements and messages to their electorate. A unified classification scheme with an accompanying set of rules was developed to make such statements comparable. Analysing manifestos allows for measurement of party and presidents' policy positions across countries and elections within a common framework. Manifestos are understood to be parties' only and presidential candidates' main authoritative policy statements and, therefore, as indicators of the parties' policy preferences at a given point in time.
The Manifesto Project Data Collection was originally created by the Manifesto Research Group (MRG) in the late 1970s and the 1980s. The work was continued under the name Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center in the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2009 the Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) project updates and extends the dataset. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and is still located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.