Search results

BACKGROUND: The reported data of HIV + pregnant women in Latin America (LA) is scarce. Given the political and social changes that have occurred in recent years, Chile has had to face immigration as a recent phenomenon. Based on this, the objective of this analysis was to determine the baseline characteristics, virological during pregnancy and postpartum, and the impact of immigration on adult women infected with HIV METHODS: The registry of HIV + pregnant women of Fundación Arriarán was analyzed since 2006. The baseline characteristics,undetectability at delivery, vertical transmission and retention were determined.Estimators as mean and median,standard deviation and interquartile range; absolute and relative frequencies were used and for the bivariate analysis the t-test and chi2,Mann–Whitney and Fisher's exact. For follow-up, the Kaplan–Meier method was used. RESULTS: A total of 214 pregnancies in 198 HIV + women were included. A 54% of foreigners (of Haitian predominance) was found, 2/3 of the foreigners were enrolled after 2016. A 73% was diagnosed with HIV at the time of pregnancy. Average age was 28.6 years. Baseline CD4 cell count was 396 cel/mm3. A 7.7% were admitted with advanced pregnancy and 4.6% had a history of drug addiction. None of these variables had significant differences between both groups. The variables of gestational age at admission (15 vs. 21; P < 0.001), gestational age at the beginning of therapy (18 vs. 21; P < 0.001), CDC stage and baseline viral load (9750 vs. 644 copies/mL;P < 0.001) were statistically significant between Chileans and foreigners. 58% of the patients achieved undetectability at the time of delivery without differences between both groups. (55% vs. 63%; p0.42) Almost 90% of women with detectable viral load at delivery was less than 1000 copies/mL (88,9%). 93% received full vertical transmission protocol and the prematurity rate was 16.6%. The vertical transmission was 2.6% without differences between nationals and foreigners. In the postpartum follow-up,70% ...

IntroductionLong‐term survival of HIV patients after initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (ART) has not been sufficiently described in Latin America and the Caribbean, as compared to other regions. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of mortality, loss to follow‐up (LTFU) and associated risk factors for patients enrolled in the Caribbean, Central and South America Network (CCASAnet).MethodsWe assessed time from ART initiation (baseline) to death or LTFU between 2000 and 2014 among ART‐naïve adults (≥18 years) from sites in seven countries included in CCASAnet: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico and Peru. Kaplan‐Meier techniques were used to estimate the probability of mortality over time. Risk factors for death were assessed using Cox regression models stratified by site and adjusted for sex, baseline age, nadir pre‐ART CD4 count, calendar year of ART initiation, clinical AIDS at baseline and type of ART regimen.ResultsA total of 16,996 ART initiators were followed for a median of 3.5 years (interquartile range (IQR): 1.6–6.2). The median age at ART initiation was 36 years (IQR: 30–44), subjects were predominantly male (63%), median CD4 count was 156 cells/µL (IQR: 60–251) and 26% of subjects had clinical AIDS prior to starting ART. Initial ART regimens were predominantly non‐nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor based (86%). The cumulative incidence of LTFU five years after ART initiation was 18.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 17.5–18.8%). A total of 1582 (9.3%) subjects died; the estimated probability of death one, three and five years after ART initiation was 5.4, 8.3 and 10.3%, respectively. The estimated five‐year mortality probability varied substantially across sites, from 3.5 to 14.0%. Risk factors for death were clinical AIDS at baseline (adjusted hazard ratio (HR)=1.65 (95% CI 1.47–1.87); p<0.001), lower baseline CD4 (HR=1.95 (95% CI 1.63–2.32) for 50 vs. 350 cells/µL; p<0.001) and older age (HR=1.47 (95% CI 1.29–1.69) for 50 vs. 30 years at ART initiation; p<0.001).ConclusionsIn this large, long‐term study of mortality among HIV‐positive adults initiating ART in Latin America and the Caribbean, overall estimates of mortality were heterogeneous, generally falling between those reported in high‐income countries and sub‐Saharan Africa.

IntroductionLatinos living with HIV in the Americas share a common ethnic and cultural heritage. In North America, Latinos have a relatively high rate of new HIV infections but lower rates of engagement at all stages of the care continuum, whereas in Latin America antiretroviral therapy (ART) services continue to expand to meet treatment needs. In this analysis, we compare HIV treatment outcomes between Latinos receiving ART in North America versus Latin America.MethodsHIV‐positive adults initiating ART at Caribbean, Central and South America Network for HIV (CCASAnet) sites were compared to Latino patients (based on country of origin or ethnic identity) starting treatment at North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design (NA‐ACCORD) sites in the United States and Canada between 2000 and 2011. Cox proportional hazards models compared mortality, treatment interruption, antiretroviral regimen change, virologic failure and loss to follow‐up between cohorts.ResultsThe study included 8400 CCASAnet and 2786 NA‐ACCORD patients initiating ART. CCASAnet patients were younger (median 35 vs. 37 years), more likely to be female (27% vs. 20%) and had lower nadir CD4 count (median 148 vs. 195 cells/µL, p<0.001 for all). In multivariable analyses, CCASAnet patients had a higher risk of mortality after ART initiation (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 1.61; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.32 to 1.96), particularly during the first year, but a lower hazard of treatment interruption (AHR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.50), change to second‐line ART (AHR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.62) and virologic failure (AHR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.57).ConclusionsHIV‐positive Latinos initiating ART in Latin America have greater continuity of treatment but are at higher risk of death than Latinos in North America. Factors underlying these differences, such as HIV testing, linkage and access to care, warrant further investigation.

IntroductionMaps are powerful tools for visualization of differences in health indicators by geographical region, but multi‐country maps of HIV indicators do not exist, perhaps due to lack of consistent data across countries. Our objective was to create maps of four HIV indicators in North, Central, and South American countries.MethodsUsing data from the North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design (NA‐ACCORD) and the Caribbean, Central, and South America network for HIV epidemiology (CCASAnet), we mapped median CD4 at presentation for HIV clinical care, proportion retained in HIV primary care, proportion prescribed antiretroviral therapy (ART), and the proportion with suppressed plasma HIV viral load (VL) from 2010 to 2012 for North, Central, and South America. The 15 Canadian and US clinical cohorts and 7 clinical cohorts in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico, and Peru represented approximately 2–7% of persons known to be living with HIV in these countries.ResultsStudy populations were selected for each indicator: median CD4 at presentation for care was estimated among 14,811 adults; retention was estimated among 87,979 adults; ART use was estimated among 84,757 adults; and suppressed VL was estimated among 51,118 adults. Only three US states and the District of Columbia had a median CD4 at presentation >350 cells/mm3. Haiti, Mexico, and several states had >85% retention in care; lower (50–74%) retention in care was observed in the US West, South, and Mid‐Atlantic, and in Argentina, Brazil, and Peru. ART use was highest (90%) in Mexico. The percentages of patients with suppressed VL in the US South and Northeast were lower than in most of Central and South America.ConclusionsThese maps provide visualization of gaps in the quality of HIV care and allow for comparison between and within countries as well as monitoring policy and programme goals within geographical boundaries.