Suchergebnisse

Cover -- Half Title -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Contents -- INTRODUCTION TO THE TRANSACTION EDITION -- PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS -- PROLOGUE. On Skeptical Sociology -- PART ONE. Human Nature and the Perspective of Sociology -- Introduction -- ONE. C. Wright Mills and the Sociological Imagination -- TWO. The Oversocialized Conception of Man in Modem Sociology -- Postscript 1975 -- THREE. Human Nature and the Perspective of Sociology -- FOUR. The Idea of "Community": A Critique -- FIVE. Identity: Problem and Catchword -- PART TWO. Social Stratification and Inequality -- Introduction -- SIX. The Functional Theory of Stratification: Some Neglected Considerations -- SEVEN. Social Inequality without Social Stratification -- EIGHT. Jews, Gentiles, and the New Establishment -- NINE. How Important Is Social Class? -- PART THREE. Power and Politics -- Introduction -- TEN. Problems in Defining Power -- ELEVEN. Force and the Threat of Force as Distinct Forms of Power -- TWELVE. Competent Authority: Reality and Legitimating Model -- THIRTEEN. Economic Development and Democracy -- A Reply to Heilbroner -- FOURTEEN. The Rhythm of Democratic Politics -- FIFTEEN. Max Weber: The Scholar as Hero -- SIXTEEN. Ends and Means in Politics -- SEVENTEEN. On Thinking about the Future -- NOTES -- INDEX

Several scholars have observed that in contrast to "socialism," "capitalism" was not an ideology promoted by a social class or movement but an economy that emerged "spontaneously" from particular historical conditions. Since the decline of the Soviet Union, no new version of socialism has been promulgated, although complaints about the inequalities of capitalism inevitably persist & will certainly continue. Capitalism, if not "eternal," remains a highly probable form of economy under conditions of economic surplus, extensive division of labor, urbanism, & the absence of fully centralized state power. An inevitably wide variation in its forms will certainly endure & in no way amounts to the "end of history," as a few writers have suggested. 7 References. Adapted from the source document.

Responds to Amitai Etzioni's (2003) opening essay in a critical forum, recommending a new socioeconomics discipline. Such a suggestion is, however, not especially novel. The proposal is critiqued in terms of the rational/nonrational implications of the classical model, the already present synthesis of the social by major economic theorists, & the need for broad understanding of "socially determined," "socialization," & "normative.". 6 References. K. Coddon