The 'China, Inc.' Challenge to Global Trade Governance
In: Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 57, 1001-1063 (2016)
21 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 57, 1001-1063 (2016)
SSRN
In: Yale Journal of International Law, Band 40, Heft 1
SSRN
In: The Foundations of International Investment Law (Z. Douglas et al., eds., Oxford Univ. Press, 2014), pp. 169-209
SSRN
Working paper
In: Trade, Law, and Development, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 93-176
SSRN
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 107, S. 447-465
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: Harvard international law journal, Band 53, Heft 1, S. 1-84
ISSN: 0017-8063
World Affairs Online
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 98, S. 103-106
ISSN: 2169-1118
SSRN
In: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2016/64
SSRN
Working paper
In: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2015/58
SSRN
Working paper
In: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2015/51
SSRN
Working paper
An agricultural price range system (PRS) aims to stabilize local prices in an open economy via the use of import duties that vary with international prices. The policy is inherently distortionary and welfare-reducing for a small open economy, at least according to the canonical economic model. We offer an explanation for why a government concerned with national welfare may nevertheless implement such a policy when faced with risk aversion and imperfect insurance markets. We also highlight open questions arising out of the Peru – Agricultural Products dispute for the WTO's Appellate Body to address in order to clarify how a PRS consistent with WTO rules could be designed. Finally, we discuss the possibility that a WTO member might resort to a free trade agreement (FTA) to preserve its flexibility to implement a PRS and how an FTA provision of this sort ought to be treated in WTO litigation.
BASE
In: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2018/60
SSRN
Working paper
This article examines the relationship between antidumping duties and strategic industrial policy. We argue that the dynamic between the two instruments is more complex and elaborate than that offered by the conventional account. We use the recent China – X-Ray Equipment dispute as a case study to show that linkage between the two instruments may not be the consequence of a government-led policy but instead a result of firm-driven responses to an industrial policy. This in turn may lead to antidumping tit-for-tat behavior between WTO members. We also analyze how WTO litigation serves as a means to alter the payoff and discuss the implications and unresolved questions that remain following the China – X-Ray Equipment ruling by the WTO.
BASE
In: Northwestern University Law Review, Band 108, Heft 2
SSRN